Reception method and CDMA receiver

Multiplex communications – Channel assignment techniques – Combining or distributing information via code word channels...

Patent

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

375205, H04J 1300

Patent

active

058319840

DESCRIPTION:

BRIEF SUMMARY
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to a reception method to be used in a CDMA system, in which signals of several users are detected simultaneously from a received signal, an adaptive nonlinear decision rule is utilized for detection and parameters of a detector are supervised on the basis of the received signal to correspond better to signal states of the received signal.
CDMA is a multiuser system based on spread-spectrum technique, the application of which system to cellular radio systems has started recently, besides the previous FDMA and TDMA systems. CDMA has several advantages compared to the previous methods, such as simplicity of frequency planning and spectrum efficiency.
In the CDMA method, a narrow-band data signal of a user is multiplied to a relatively broad band by a spreading code having a considerably broader band than the data signal. Bandwidths used in known test systems are for instance, 1,25 MHz, 10 MHz and 25 MHz. In connection with the multiplication, the data signal spreads to the whole band to be used. All users transmit simultaneously by using the same frequency band. Each connection between a base station and a mobile station uses its own spreading code and the signals of the users can be separated from each other in receivers on the basis of each user's spreading code. The purpose is to select the spreading codes in such a way that they are mutually orthogonal, i.e. they do not correlate with each other.
Correlators in a CDMA receiver implemented in a conventional manner are synchronized with a desired signal, which is detected on the basis of a spreading code. The data signal is returned to the original band in the receiver by remultiplying it by the same spreading code as was used for spreading the original narrow band signal at the transmission stage. In an ideal case, the signals multiplied by some other spreading code do not correlate and do not return to the narrow band. Thus, they appear as noise with respect to the desired signal. Accordingly, the aim is to detect a desired user's signal from among several interfering signals. In practice, spreading codes are not decorrelatable and other users' signals make the detection of the desired signal more difficult by distorting the received signal nonlinearly. This interference caused by the users to each other is called a multiuser interference.
The single-user detection method described above is not optimal, because it ignores in connection with detection the information included in other users' signals. Additionally, conventional detection is not capable of correcting nonlinearities, which are partially caused by nonorthogonal spreading codes and a distortion of a signal on a radio path. An optimum receiver considers the information included in the signals of all users so that the signals may be detected optimally by using the Viterbi algorithm, for instance. An advantage of this detection method is that bit error ratio curves of the receiver resemble a situation of the single-user CDMA system with no multiuser interferences occurring. No near-far problem exists, for instance. The term near-far problem refers to a situation in which a transmitter close to a receiver covers with its transmission the transmitters located farther away. The most serious deficiency of the Viterbi algorithm is that the computational intensity required increases exponentially with an increasing number of users. For instance, a ten-user system having a bit rate of 100 kbit/s using QPSK modulation would require 105 millions of measurements to be made per second for a computation of the likelihood function. In practice, this prevents implementation of the optimum receiver.
An optimum receiver can, however, be approximated by different methods. As prior art are known different kinds of methods for simultaneous multiuser detection. To the best known methods belong ones using a linear multiuser detector, decorrelating detector or multistage detector. These methods are described in more detail in the references Varanasi, Aazhang; Multistag

REFERENCES:
patent: 4894842 (1990-01-01), Broekhoven et al.
patent: 5136612 (1992-08-01), Bi
patent: 5237586 (1993-08-01), Bottomley
patent: 5268927 (1993-12-01), Dimos et al.
patent: 5321949 (1994-06-01), Lemson
patent: 5339384 (1994-08-01), Chen
patent: 5343496 (1994-08-01), Honig et al.
patent: 5353300 (1994-10-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5377225 (1994-12-01), Davis
patent: 5515378 (1996-05-01), Roy et al.
IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 40, No. 7, Jul. 1992, Behnaam Aazhang et al.
IEICE Trans. Commun., vol. E76-B, No. 8, Aug. 1993, T. Miyajima et al.
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 35, No. 1, Jan. 1989, Lupas et al.
Communication Systems, An Introduction to Signals and Noise in Electrical Communication, Third Edition, A. Bruce Carlson, pp. 640-643.
Varanasi, Aazhang, "Multistage Detection in Asynchronous Code-Divisio;n Multiple-Access Communications", IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 38, pp. 509-519.
Lupas, Ruxandra, "Near-Far Resistance of Multiuser Detectors in Asynchronous Channels", IEEE Transactions on Commnications, vol. 38, No. 4, Apr. 1990, pp. 496-508.
Kohonen, Teuvo, "The Self-Organizing Map", Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 78, No. 9, Sep. 1990, pp. 1464-1480.
Kohonen, Teuvo, "Generalizations of the Self-Orgainzing Map", Proceedings of 1993 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, IJCNN'93, Nagoya, Japan, Oct. 25-29, 1993, pp. 457-463.
Kohonen, Teuvo, "Things You Haven't Heard About the Self-Organizing Map", Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Networks, San Francisco, USA, Mar. 28-Apr. 1, 1995, pp. 1147-1156.
Kohonen et al., "Start-Up Behaviour of a Neural Network Assisted Decision Feedback Equaliser in a Two-Path Channel", Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Communications, Chicago, USA, Jun. 14-18, 1992, pp. 1523-1527.
Benvenuto et al., "A Comparison Between Real and Complex Valued Neural Networks in Communication Applications", Proc. of Int. Conf. Artificial Neural Networks, Espoo, Finland, Jun. 1991, pp. 1177-1180.
Battiti, Roberto, "Accelerated Backpropagation Learning: Two Optimization Methods", Complex Systems 3, pp. 331-342, 1989.
Poggio et al., A Theory of Networks for Approximation and Learning, MIT memo No. 1140, 1989.
Shepanski, J. F. Fast Learning in Artificial Neural Systems: Multilayer Perception Training Using Optimal Estimation, ICNN, 1988.
Cooper et al. Modern Communications And Spread Spectrum, "Detection of Spread-Spectrum Signals", McGraw-Hill, New York 1986, Chapter 13, pp. 345-375.
Kohonen, Teuvo, "Self-Organization and Associative Memory", Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York-Tokio, Third edition, 1989.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Reception method and CDMA receiver does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Reception method and CDMA receiver, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reception method and CDMA receiver will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-698156

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.