Really simple mail transport protocol

Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput – Computer conferencing – Demand based messaging

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C709S237000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07103635

ABSTRACT:
A new mail transport protocol is proposed for use over a reliable byte-stream transport. This protocol is faster, simpler and more streaming than prior methods, and handles binary and unicode data more efficiently. The protocol requires fewer communication round trips between servers per message transferred than existing methods. It transmits and receives byte data as is without requiring further per-byte processing on advanced operating systems such as UNIX, and requires only new-line processing in text on legacy operating systems.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5257369 (1993-10-01), Skeen et al.
patent: 5333266 (1994-07-01), Boaz et al.
patent: 5383203 (1995-01-01), Miyazono
patent: 5463620 (1995-10-01), Sriram
patent: 5539750 (1996-07-01), Kivi-Mannila et al.
patent: 5583993 (1996-12-01), Foster et al.
patent: 5657390 (1997-08-01), Elgamal et al.
patent: 5699517 (1997-12-01), Yamasaki
patent: 5758088 (1998-05-01), Bezaire et al.
patent: 5764241 (1998-06-01), Elliott et al.
patent: 5768505 (1998-06-01), Gilchrist et al.
patent: 5841966 (1998-11-01), Irribarren
patent: 5948066 (1999-09-01), Whalen et al.
patent: 5958015 (1999-09-01), Dascalu
patent: 5974310 (1999-10-01), Bilgic
patent: 6006269 (1999-12-01), Phaal
patent: 6035327 (2000-03-01), Buckley et al.
patent: 6134432 (2000-10-01), Holmes et al.
patent: 6161203 (2000-12-01), Zuranski et al.
patent: 6215769 (2001-04-01), Ghani et al.
patent: 6658456 (2003-12-01), Shimoosawa
patent: 6675196 (2004-01-01), Kronz
patent: 6680946 (2004-01-01), Isoyama et al.
patent: 6707472 (2004-03-01), Grauman
patent: 6993563 (2006-01-01), Lytle et al.
patent: 2002/0120697 (2002-08-01), Generous et al.
patent: 2002/0144154 (2002-10-01), Tomkow
patent: 2002/0178360 (2002-11-01), Wenocur et al.
Fielding, R.; Gettys, J.; Mogul, J.; Frystyk J.; Berners-Lee, T. RFC 2068 (RFC2068). Network Working Group. Jan. 1997.
Richardson, Christopher. Linux Qmail+MH mini-HOWTO (part 1/1). Google Group comp.os.linux.answers. Jan. 7, 1998.
Freed, N; Borenstein. RFC 2045 (RFC2045). Network Working Group. Nov. 1996.
Khare, Rohit. The spec's in the mail. Internet Computing, IEEE, vol. 2, Issue 5. Sep.-Oct. 1998. pp. 82-86.
Batista, T.V.; Rodriguez, N.L.R.; Soares, L.F.G.; Resende, M.C.; Hypermedia mail over WWW. Community Networking, 1996. Proceedings., 3rd International Workshop on, May 23-24, 1996. pp. 83-89.
Ahrens, A.; Greiner, G.; A Radio Protocol for TCP/IP Application. Frequency Selection and Management Techniques for HF Communications (Ref. No. 1999/017), IEE Colloquium on , Mar. 29-30, 1999. pp. 11/1-11/6.
Read, B.J.; WWW in an Open Office System. International Seminar on Client/Server Computing. Seminar Proceedings (Digest No. 1995/184), IEE Colloquium on , vol. 1, Oct. 30-31, 1995. pp. 16/1-16/5 vol. 1.
Burns, Roger; ADMIN: Length limits. Google Group alt.med.cfs. Sep. 11, 1996.
Tracer, Bach. Complete Address Traces! Google Group comp.os.reseearch. Dec. 27, 1991.
Karwin, Bill. Re: Help Interbase 5.1. Google Group intebase.public.general. Feb. 5, 1999.
McMurtrie, Kevin. Re: Length limit on query string? Google Group comp.infosystems.www.authoring.cgi. Jan. 1, 2002.
Postel, Jonathan B. RFC 821 (RFC821). Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California. Aug. 1982.
Finseth, C. RFC 1492 (RFC1492). Network Working Group. Jul. 1993.
Tzerefox, P.; Smythe, C.; Stergiou, I.; Cvetkovic, S. A Comparative Study of Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP), Post Office Protocol (POP) and X.400 Electronic Mail Protocols. Local Computer Networks, Nov. 1997. pp. 545-554.
Crocker, D.H.; “RFC 822—Standard for the Format of ARPA Internet Text Messages.” www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc822.html Aug. 13, 1982.
IBM-TDB-ACC-NO: NN8808174—“Simple Mail Transfer Protocol and Sockets on SNA”; IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Aug. 1988, US; vol. 31, Issue 3, p. 174; Aug. 1, 1988.
IBM-TDB-ACC-NO: NN9111110—“Cover Page Technique for an IBM-X.400 Gateway”; IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Nov. 1991, US; vol. 34, Issue 6, pp. 110-112; Nov. 1, 1991.
Postel, Jonathan B.; RFC 821 (RFC821); Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California; Aug. 1982.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Really simple mail transport protocol does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Really simple mail transport protocol, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Really simple mail transport protocol will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3528191

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.