Surgery – Means for introducing or removing material from body for... – Infrared – visible light – ultraviolet – x-ray or electrical...
Reexamination Certificate
2000-07-11
2002-07-16
Bockelman, Mark (Department: 3762)
Surgery
Means for introducing or removing material from body for...
Infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, x-ray or electrical...
Reexamination Certificate
active
06421561
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
I. Field of the Invention
The present invention concerns transdermal delivery of therapeutic agents by use of an applied electromotive force, commonly known as iontophoresis. More particularly, the invention is directed to a system for iontophoresis that is self contained, quantitatively self limiting, and in which the delivery rate is variable or adjustable. The system is contained preferably in a rather small skin worn patch which contains electrodes and a therapeutic agent. When applied to the skin, the system completes a circuit and spontaneously initiates the flow of a galvanic current of measured, limited duration corresponding to the desired amount of therapeutic agent to be delivered. The system may be anode or cathode limited.
II. Related Art
The process of iontophoresis was described by LeDuc in 1908, and has since found commercial use in the delivery of ionically charged compounds such as pilocarpine, dexamethasone, and lidocaine. In this delivery method, ions bearing a positive charge are driven across the skin at the site of an electrolytic electrical system anode, while ions bearing a negative charge are driven across the skin at the site of an electrolytic electrical system cathode.
With iontophoretic devices, the application time and level of current flow (usually reported in units of milliamp-minutes) between the anode and cathode is directly correlated to the amount of drug delivered. The efficiency of drug delivery in an iontophoretic system can be measured by the proportion of current carried by the drug molecule, relative to the current carried by competing non-medication ions having the same charge as the medication.
At present, iontophoresis devices are conventionally comprised of two electrodes attached to a patient, each connected via a wire to a microprocessor controlled electrical instrument. Medication is placed under one or both of the electrodes, for delivery into the body as the instrument is activated. The instrument is designed to regulate current flow and application time. Examples of such instruments are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,254,081, and 5,431,625. Power for these devices is usually provided by DC batteries, which when providing power for the microprocessor controlled circuitry allow application of a voltage to the electrodes to create a regulated current flow. The automated control of current flow and time (milliamp-minutes) is of great advantage, in order to prevent excessive dosages of therapeutic agents from being delivered. However, these battery powered microprocessor systems are disadvantaged by the fact that patients are ‘attached by wire’ to an instrument, which limits patient mobility and ability to conduct normal daily activities. A typical application period is approximately 20 minutes to 2 hours, which consumes instrument, caregiver, and patient time.
A significant advantage of a microprocessor controlled iontophoretic system is an ability to adjust electrical current as a function of time, while the system is being used. For example, to administer medication quickly into systemic circulation, an initial high flow rate is desired. However, adjustment to a lower flow rate may be desired afterward for optimal maintenance of a particular plasma medication level.
More recently, wearable iontophoretic systems have been developed in which the electrical circuitry and power supplied are integrated into a single patch. These systems are advantageous in that they do not require external wires, and they are much smaller in size. Examples of such systems can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,358,483; 5,458,569; 5,466,217; 5,605,536; and 5,651,768. However, these systems also have drawbacks. They are relatively inflexible and expensive, owing to the requirements of multiple electronic components, battery power supplies and electrical interconnects.
Power to drive iontophoretic current flow can also be supplied by galvanic means, which utilizes dissimilar anode and cathode materials to produce a spontaneous current flow when they are contacted with the body. These systems hold advantage, in that separate electrical circuitry and battery sources are not required. An iontophoretic device, not of the transdermal type, but one which utilizes galvanic means is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,322,520, which describes an implanted device designed to deliver oligodynamic metal ions from its surface, in order to kill bacteria on or near it.
Devices suggesting galvanic power as a means to transdermally deliver medication are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,162,042, and 5,405,317. These devices are disadvantaged by the fact that the amount of medication delivered is not automatically regulated, and they require a timely removal of the device from the body to prevent a potentially toxic over-dosage of medication.
In a co-pending application PCT/US99/18861, designating the U.S., claiming priority based on U.S. provisional application No. 60/098,652, assigned to the same Assignee as the present application, an iontophoresis patch system is described which uses galvanic power and provides a known dosage capacity. Thus, this system can be designed to automatically shut off after a specified dosage, and the risk of overdosage is eliminated. That co-pending application is deemed incorporated herein by reference for any purpose.
Horstmann, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,685,837, describes a transdermal therapeutic system which uses series mounted sheet-like galvanic elements as a power source. That device has an ability to either create a constant intensity of current using a high internal resistance element, or create a gradual decreasing current intensity using a low internal resistance element. The low internal resistance, and a decreasing current flow, is caused by a build up of ions into an electrolyte layer of the galvanic element.
While it appears advantageous, there are certain practical disadvantages to the Horstmann system. To achieve a decreasing current, a very thin electrolyte layer required. The thin layer is susceptible to mechanical failure during production or use. Also, rather than the gradual decreasing current of the Horstmann system, a steady high rate of current which then rapidly falls is optimal, so that a known charge dosage can be administered in minimal time. The actual charge dosage administered using the Horstmann device is not accurately known, since a nernstian decline in voltage is in a non-linear diminishing rate, and thus the system will not fall to zero current during practical time scales.
One restriction of all galvanic systems is a limited supply of user-friendly materials which can be practically used. Many materials may be toxic themselves, and/or they may be difficult to work with in the manufacturing process. A significant problem lies with materials that are reactive with water, and therefore can alter the pH of the medication solution during use. pH changes can harm skin, or cause adverse reaction with medication. For example, we have found zinc (E
0
=−2.37) to be an excellent galvanic material, but magnesium (E
0
=−2.37) causes a pH change in iontophoretic medication chambers. Silver chloride (E
0
=+0.222) does not affect pH of a medication chamber, but manganese dioxide (E
0
=+1.23) does. Consequently, the voltages obtainable in galvanically powered systems are limited by material stability or compatibility. Of course, various other species may have application as oxidizable or reducible species under different circumstances.
Another restriction or limitation of galvanically powered systems is an inability to increase or decrease voltage (and medication delivery) during use. The voltage is fixed by the galvanic ½ reactions used, and cannot be altered in process. This is a significant disadvantage in circumstances where increasing rate of delivery, such as to administer a bolus of medication, is desired. Accordingly, it would present a great advantage were increased potential available in such a device.
A primary object of the invention is to pr
Birch Point Medical, Inc.
Bockelman Mark
Nikolai & Mersereau , P.A.
LandOfFree
Rate adjustable drug delivery system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Rate adjustable drug delivery system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Rate adjustable drug delivery system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2875515