Telecommunications – Transmitter and receiver at separate stations – With control signal
Reexamination Certificate
2000-05-11
2004-02-10
Vo, Nguyen T. (Department: 2685)
Telecommunications
Transmitter and receiver at separate stations
With control signal
C455S522000, C455S067110
Reexamination Certificate
active
06690922
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to the field of precise measurement of RF power, and in general to the compensation of radio system RF losses, particularly the compensation of radio system RF losses using closed loop gain compensation.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In radio installations generally, the amount of radio frequency (RF) energy transmitted at the antenna is desirably held consistent from one installation to another. However, many sources of variation in each device result in significant variations. In ground-based single channel communication, the satellite accounts for variations by transmitting command signals to the ground-based unit to increase or decrease power output during transmission. Multichannel communication system installations for use in mass transportation vehicles, such as commercial air transport aircraft, are more complex.
Multichannel communication systems accept data and voice from various sources onboard a vehicle, encode and modulate this information to appropriate RF carrier frequencies, and transmit these carriers over any of multiple transmission channels to the satellite constellation for relay to the ground. Multichannel satellite communication (SatCom) systems also receive RF signals from the satellite constellation, demodulate these signals, perform the necessary decoding of the encoded messages, and output data or voice for use onboard the vehicle by crew members and passengers. Transceivers in such multichannel mobile satellite communication systems include a main system CPU for performing the actual transmit and receive functions, a radio control subsystem that allocates transmission channels to calls, a high power amplifier for boosting the channel power, a common antenna receiving and transmitting signals, and a low noise amplifier amplifying the RF signal received from a satellite. In multichannel mobile communication systems, such as an aircraft installation, many sources of variation in each installation result in significant installation-to-installation variations. For example, typical aeronautical SatCom system installations divide the system functions into multiple separate modules, including a telecommunications module housing the main system CPU and the radio control subsystem, a high power amplifier module, a low noise amplifier module, and the antenna. One important source of variation is inconsistencies in the equipment manufacture. Another important source of variation is the use of different types and lengths of wiring, usually coaxial cable, to interconnect the various physically separated modules, or components, of the communication unit. Although the various functional modules are interconnected with standardized wires or cables for inter-module control and to connect RF signals, installation-to-installation cable type and length variations produce variations in the amount of RF energy at the antenna.
While the desirability of holding the amount of RF energy transmitted at the antenna consistent from one aircraft installation to another is recognized, the necessary use of different types and lengths of cable in different aircraft installations is overcome only by a universal standard cable type and length. Such a standard cable is necessarily the cable required for the most demanding application. Thus, installation-to-installation consistency would require every aircraft to carry the longest, heaviest coupling cables. However, in aircraft installations, the addition of excess cable length and weight is not desirable. Furthermore, a universal type of cable may not satisfy the requirements of all radio installations. Therefore, the variations must be compensated in another way.
The satellite attempts to account for these and other variations in amount of RF energy transmitted at the antenna by transmitting command signals to the communication unit to increase or decrease power output during transmission. In multichannel aircraft installations, the radio control subsystem of the communication unit dynamically controls the output power for each radio transmission channel. The typical communication unit uses closed loop power control algorithms, such as an automatic gain control circuit, for controlling RF power levels at the antenna. The transmitter communication unit receives transmit power level commands from the network satellite, which are intended to control the amount of power radiated by the antenna. The automatic gain control circuit causes the radio control subsystem to increase or decrease power output on each active radio transmission channel in response to command signals transmitted from the satellite. However, the changes in output power applied by the radio control subsystem are not translated consistently into output power at the antenna because the differing amounts of power absorption by the RF cables interconnecting the various modules results in variations in the coupling losses between the radio control subsystem and the antenna. These variations cannot be compensated by the automatic gain control circuit. Such losses may range anywhere from 0 to 20 dB or more, depending upon the installation.
Thus, even with standardized intermodule wiring, each installation results in different amount of cable loss relative to other similarly wired installations. This variation in RF cable loss presents problems with the closed loop power control algorithms of many second generation satellite systems. The installation-to-installation differences in the amount of RF cable loss causes variations in the amount of RF energy at the antenna. Thus, these installation-to-installation variations in cable loss produce variations in the amount of power radiated by the antenna. Such variable losses in a RF transmission system require an accurate RF power measurement for closed-loop power control.
Manual control of the radiated power variations is impractical. For example, attempting to reduce the installation-to-installation variation by tightly controlling the cable types and cable lengths results in a significantly more difficult installation. Manually measuring power levels and manually adjusting the gain of the high power amplifier until a specified power level is measured also results in a significantly more difficult installation.
Furthermore, in installations where standard cabling is provided, adding a cable for a new purpose, such as determining the output power at the antenna relative to the output power at the transmission channel, is not a practical option. Therefore, the detection and communication of system losses must utilize existing cables. One attempt to resolve the coupling losses between the radio control subsystem and the antenna added a DC bias on the return cable from the antenna to the radio control subsystem. However, the DC bias is subject to the same cable losses as the original signal.
Another difficulty presented by the prior art is actual measurement of the power level during a transmit period of a signal that is modulated with digital data. The nature of digital satellite communications is to transmit in short, unpredictable bursts. This short RF burst transmission causes a typical aeronautical SatCom system to operate normally with a transmission method having a duty cycle of less than 100%, and possibly less than 10%. Accurate measurement of the power level during such short and unpredictable transmit periods cannot be achieved using traditional methods.
Conventional measurement systems use generic power measurement methods. Each measurement systems has drawbacks with respect to the manner in which it reports a RMS (Root Mean Square) value for a given signal. The typical method expects a continuous wave (CW) RF transmission, and the measurement systems is tuned to generate accurate RMS values at a given frequency.
FIG. 1
illustrates a typical Phase Shift Keying (PSK) modulation scheme. The In-phase portion is shown as I, and the Quadrature-phase portion is shown as Q. When I and Q are both zero, no output signal is generated. The I and Q portions are modulated in time to represent
Honeywell International , Inc.
Nguyen Simon
Vo Nguyen T.
LandOfFree
Radio frequency (RF) system loss compensation method using... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Radio frequency (RF) system loss compensation method using..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Radio frequency (RF) system loss compensation method using... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3284004