Communications: electrical – Selective – Interrogation response
Reexamination Certificate
2001-03-09
2002-11-12
Mullen, Thomas (Department: 2632)
Communications: electrical
Selective
Interrogation response
C340S010510
Reexamination Certificate
active
06480100
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Radio frequency identification (“RFID”) tags are electronic memory devices to which data representing information may be written to and/or read from by an RFID interrogator. The tag may be affixed to or otherwise associated with a particular tagged component, including an item, animal, assembly, device, or product, to store information on the tag relating to that tagged component.
The RFID tag may include a memory chip and a radio signal receiving and transmitting device, both encapsulated together, comprising a transponder. The transponder may be housed within a plastic or otherwise protective housing. The housing containing the transponder may be affixed to the tagged component.
The RFID tag may be communicated with by an RFID tag interrogator, comprising a radio signal sending and receiving device, and a recorder for storing transmitted data. The RFID tag may also include a processor for reformatting or otherwise processing the transmitted data. The interrogator may also comprise multiple components, such as a hand-held transceiver device, and a computer or other storage and/or processing component to handle data storage, processing, and transmission between the hand-held transceiver and the processor.
In prior art RFID tag uses, the format and content of data stored on an RFID tag is structured in a standardized data format. The standardized data format is typically common to a particular industry or group, and to be useable within that industry or group for the intended information storage purpose, the data stored on the tags must be formatted in the standardized format to be understandable to an RFID tag interrogator.
Such practices work well in certain industries, such as for the identification of animals in a feedlot, where a standardized data structure or formatting requirements for the data on the tags may be anticipated. Thereby, the standardized format may successfully accommodate the data formatting needs for that particular industry. Another example, is product bar codes, where a standardized bar formatting system may serve to assign essentially every commercially mass marketed product with a bar code. The data requirements are basically just a product number. Thereafter, the product number may be referenced to other databases containing additional information regarding that particular product. Similarly, an RFID tag such as used in the animal tracking industry may contain all needed information within a tag including a country or location code, and a unique animal identification number. Thereby, a common format for the data stored on the tag may be used throughout the cattle industry.
However, such tag systems may be inefficient or impose undesirable limitations in an industry where no particular standardized data format may serve all data storage and retrieval needs for a particular industry. For example, in an industry where it may be desirable to include on a tag, a substantial amount of component identification, composition and/or historical data related to that particular component, the probability that everyone concerned with reading and/or writing data to or from the tag may desire a particular common data format becomes increasingly unlikely. Such scheme may also create a highly inefficient use of the limited available memory capacity on the tag.
For example, in the petrochemical processing industry, each processing plant will include a vast variety of component variations and equipment types and uses, and will be obtained from a substantial variety of manufacturers, and will be serviced by a wide array of inspectors, services and repairs during the life of each component. One manufacturer may desire only to include their five letter name and a series of data fields describing the product design and specifications, while another manufacturer of a similar component may desire to provide their fifteen character name, a full product description, manufacturing dates and location codes, factory testing data unique to that component, and cost information. Providing an RFID tag data formatting scheme to accommodate the needs of the second manufacturer may be highly inefficient to the first manufacturer. Conversely, providing a scheme to accommodate only the needs of the first manufacturer may be of little value to the second manufacturer.
Prior art RFID tag uses have utilized a selected data storage formatting scheme to accommodate the needs of a particular group of users, such as the cattle industry. Tag users within the group are provided a standardized tag data format, common to all users within that group, including storage on the tag for only pre-determined data fields, each having a pre-set field size and location. For some users, such system may be adequate, while others may feel that the tag is under-utilized or inefficient to meet their desired tag objectives. Little to no flexibility may be available to the dissatisfied tag users to customize the data storage on the tag to meet their desired objectives. If a particular user in a group reformatted the data on his tags, the tags would likely not be decipherable to other users within that group.
Another limitation to prior art methods for formatting data storage on RFID tags is the inability to provide for multiple, user definable data formats on a single RFID tag. With prior art tags, all users who write or read data to a tag have to know the data format on the tag, and conform thereto. Each user follows the same formatting scheme, and may not deviate therefrom and still retain data readily available to all other users.
A method is desired for using an RFID tag which provides each user of the tag with the ability to customize the data stored thereon in a customized format, while still being readily understandable by substantially any other users of the tag. A method is also desired which may permit multiple users to use a single tag and for each user thereof to define a format and utilize a corresponding portion of the full memory/storage capacity available on the tag.
It is desired that tag formatting methods of this invention may facilitate the creation of or become an industry standard, through overcoming the limiting disadvantages of prior art. A method is desired in which the method of customizing the RFID tag data format and making that format readily determinable by other users of the particular tag, may become an industry standard for substantially any industry. The disadvantages of the prior art are overcome by the present invention and an improved method of using an RFID tag and customizing data stored thereon. is hereinafter disclosed.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides methods for customized formatting, structuring, and/or organizing data stored on a radio-frequency (RF) identification tag, while simultaneously making the custom format understandable to substantially anyone desiring to read the data thereon. According to this invention, an RFID tag user may select and define a series of data elements/fields the user desires to store on the tag. The tag user may define the order and location in which the data fields are stored on the tag. Thereby, each tag user may permit the data storage space available on the tag to meet that user's objectives for using the tag.
The tag user may store the data format in a data format file and provide that data format with a data format name. The data format name may be the file name. The data format file may be recorded under the data format file name, remote to the tag, such as in a computer or on a web site. The data format name may be made available on the RFID tag, such that accessing the tag provides the name of the data format file containing the solution or key to the customized data format file. Thereby, when another tag user later interrogates the tag, the user may be provided the name of the file containing the solution for the data format. The file may be located and loaded into the interrogator, such that the understandable information may be provided to another tag user. Thereby, the anothe
Frieden Donald J.
Meyo John F.
Weston William Clay
Browning & Bushman P.C.
Mullen Thomas
SAT Corporation
LandOfFree
Radio frequency identification tag formatting method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Radio frequency identification tag formatting method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Radio frequency identification tag formatting method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2987182