Radiation therapy treatment method

X-ray or gamma ray systems or devices – Specific application – Absorption

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C378S901000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06714620

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to radiation therapy. Embodiments of the invention are implemented as a software system, called NXEGS, that uses Monte Carlo simulation of radiation transport for radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) and includes the following capabilities: commissioning of a linear accelerator to construct an equivalent source model, simulation of radiation transport through beam modifiers, and simulation of radiation transport in a patient or phantom to obtain the resulting dose distribution. Embodiments of the invention are implemented using a digital computer programmed to execute the NXEGS software and algorithms described herein.
2. Description of Related Art
The following background citations will be referred to by the references indicated in brackets. The entirety of all of these citations are incorporated herein by reference.
[1] W. R. Nelson and D. W. O. Rogers, “Structure and Operation of the EGS4 Code System” in
Monte Carlo Transport of Electrons and Photons,
T. M. Jenkins, W. R. Nelson and A. Rindi, eds., Plenum, 287-305, (1989).
[2] D. W. O. Rogers and A. F. Bielajew, “Code Accuracy” (Section III, pp. 492-522) in “Monte Carlo techniques of electron and photon transport for radiation dosimetry” in
The Dosimetry of Ionizing Radiation,
Vol. III, K. Kase, B. Bjangard and F. Attix, eds., Academic Press, 427-539, (1990).
[3] D. W. O. Rogers, B. A Faddegon, G. X. Ding, C. -M. Ma, J. We and T. R. Mackie, “BEAM: A Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units”
Medical Physics
22 (1995) 503-524.
[4] C. -M. Ma, B. A Faddegon, D. W. O. Rogers and T. R. Mackie, “Accurate characterization of Monte Carlo calculated electron beams for radiotherapy”
Medical Physics
24 (1997) 401-416.
[5] J. J. DeMarco, T. D. Solberg and J. B. Smathers, “A CT-based Monte Carlo simulation tool for dosimetry planning and analysis”
Medical Physics
25 (1998) 1-11.
[6] C. L. Hartmann Siantar, et al. “Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's PEREGRINE Project” UCRL-JC-126732 and in 12
th
International Conference on the Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy
. (1997).
[7] A. F. Bielajew and D. W. O. Rogers, “Variance-Reduction Techniques” in
Monte Carlo Transport of Electrons and Photons
, T. M. Jenkins, W. R. Nelson and A. Rindi, eds., Plenum, 407-419, 1989.
[8] D. L. Donoho “De-noising by soft-thresholding”,
IEEE Transaction. Information Theory
41 (1995) 613-627.
[9] L. Rudin and S. J. Osher “Total variation based image restoration with free local constraints”
Proceedings of
1
st
International Conference on Image Processing, Austin, Tex.,
IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, (1994), p.31-35.
[10] A. L. Ames, D. R. Nadeau and J. L. Moreland (1997)
VRML
2.0
Sourcebook
Wiley pp. 112-115.
[11] H. A. Bethe (1953) “Molière's theory of multiple scattering” Phys. Rev. 89, 1256-1266.
[12] W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling and B. P. Flannery. “Linear Regularization Methods” in
Numerical Recipes in C. The Art of Scientific Computing.
Cambridge Press (1992) pp. 309-315, 620-623, 808-815.
[13] “Evaluated Teletherapy Source Library” (2000) U.S. Pat. No. 6,029,079.
[14] “Calculation of Radiation Therapy Dose Using All Particle Monte Carlo Transport” (1999) U.S. Pat. No. 5,870,697.
[15] “Treatment Planning Method and Apparatus for Radiation Therapy” (1999) International Patent Application #WO99/40523
[16] J. O. Deasy. “Denoising of electron beam Monte Carlo dose distributions using digital filtering techniques”
Phys. Med. Biol.
45 (2000) 1765-1779.
[17] I. Kawrakow and M. Fippel (2000) “Investigation of variance reduction techniques for Monte Carlo photon dose calculation using XVMC”
Phys. Med. Biol.
45, 2163-2183.
[18] J. Sempau, S. J. Wilderman and A. F. Bielajew (2000) “DPM, a fast, accurate Monte Carlo code optimized for photon and electron radiotherapy treatment planning dose calculations”
Phys. Med. Biol.
45, 2263-2291.
[19] T. Holmes and T. R. Mackie (1994) “A filtered backprojection dose calculation method for inverse treatment planning”
Med. Phys.
21, 303-313.
[20] J. R. Cunningham (1972) “Scatter-air ratios” Phys. Med. Biol. 7, 42-51.
[21] T. R. Mackie, J. W. Scrimger and J. J. Battista (1985) “A convolution method of calculating dose for 15 MV x-rays” Med. Phys. 12, 188-196.
[22] M. Kalos and P. Whitlock (1986)
Monte Carlo Methods Vol.
1. Wiley. pp. 92-103 and 107-109.
[23] E. Veach and L. J. Guibas (1995) “Optimally combining sampling techniques for Monte Carlo rendering” in
Computer Graphics Proceedings. SIGGRAPH
95, R. Cook, ed., ACM, 1995. p.419-28.
[24] K. R. Hogstrom, M. D. Mills ad P. R. Almond (1981) “Electron beam dose calculations” Phys. Med. Biol. 26, 445.
[25] B. A. Faddegon and I. Blevis (2000) “Electron spectra derived from depth dose distributions” Med. Phys. 27, 514-526.
[26] A. F. Bielajew and D. W. O. Rogers (1987) “PRESTA: The Parameter Reduced Electron-Step Transport Algorithm for Electron Monte Carlo Transport” Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B18, 165-181.
About 1,400,000 people in the US are diagnosed with cancerous tumors each year. Every American has roughly a 50% chance of contracting some form of cancer during their lifetime, and the number of cases is anticipated to rise substantially in the years to come. Roughly 50% of those diagnosed are treated with radiation in the form of high energy electron beams or photon (X-ray) beams.
FIG. 1.1
shows a schematic drawing of the treatment setup. The radiation source is typically a linear accelerator (linac). After it is emitted from the linac, the radiation beam passes through a set of beam modifiers and then on to the patient or phantom. The treatment head, consisting of linac and beam modifiers, is contained in a moveable gantry, whose position and direction are variable.
FIG. 1.2
shows more detail of the components within the treatment head. Following the linac, one finds four moveable jaws (“left” and “right”, “up” and “down”) that determine the width of the photon beam in the plane transverse to the central axis and one or more scrapers used to define the size of the electron beam. Then there are beam modifiers (such as the wedge and port shown in the
FIG. 1.2
) that are used to modify the intensity profile of the beam.
In order to make the treatment more effective, one must plan quantitatively the exposure to radiation in terms of dose amount, time duration and scheduling of treatments. This requires an accurate simulation of the way in which the radiation beams pass through the patient's tissue and interact with the tumor. Typically, multiple radiation beams are used on a patient, and their direction and intensity must be chosen carefully to apply adequate dose to the cancer without harming healthy tissues.
Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and other new treatment modalities allow much more aggressive treatment therapies. These might prescribe a high dose to a target that is close to a critical tissue, so that relatively small errors in the dose calculation could be of great clinical significance. Monte Carlo simulation is the most accurate method for computation of radiation dose delivery, and so it is desired for radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP).
The Monte Carlo method for radiation therapy involves direct computational simulation of the physics of particle transport in the transport media (the beam modifiers and the patient). Particles interact with the transport media through atomistic processes, the outcomes of which are chosen randomly using scattering cross-sections. “Monte Carlo” refers to these random choices, which are made with the help of a computerized random number generator.
EGS4
The Monte Carlo computer code EGS4, developed at the Stanford Linear Accelerator (SLAC) and the National Research Council of Canada (NRCC) &l

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Radiation therapy treatment method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Radiation therapy treatment method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Radiation therapy treatment method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3207091

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.