Liquid purification or separation – Processes – Using magnetic force
Reexamination Certificate
1999-07-14
2001-11-27
Reifsnyder, David A. (Department: 1723)
Liquid purification or separation
Processes
Using magnetic force
C210S748080, C210S787000, C210S222000, C210S243000, C210S512100, C209S012100, C209S227000, C209S722000, C096S002000, C096S003000, C095S028000, C095S269000, C055S447000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06322706
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention pertains generally to particle filters. More particularly, the present invention pertains to plasma filters which are effective for processing a multi-species plasma to separate light mass particles in the plasma from heavy mass particles in the plasma. The present invention is particularly, but not exclusively, useful for the remediation of nuclear waste.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The general principles of operation for a plasma centrifuge are well known and well understood. In short, a plasma centrifuge generates forces on charged particles which will cause the particles to separate from each other according to their mass. More specifically, a plasma centrifuge relies on the effect crossed electric and magnetic fields have on charged particles. As is known, crossed electric and magnetic fields will cause charged particles in a plasma to move through the centrifuge on respective helical paths around a centrally oriented longitudinal axis. As the charged particles transit the centrifuge under the influence of these crossed electric and magnetic fields they are, of course, subject to various forces. Specifically, in the radial direction, i.e. a direction perpendicular to the axis of particle rotation in the centrifuge, these forces are: 1) a centrifugal force, F
c
, which is caused by the motion of the particle; 2) an electric force, F
E
, which is exerted on the particle by the electric field, E
r
; and 3) a magnetic force, F
B
, which is exerted on the particle by the magnetic field, B
z
. Mathematically, each of these forces are respectively expressed as:
F
c
=Mr&ohgr;
2
;
F
E
=eE
r
; and
F
B
=er&ohgr;B
z
.
Where:
M is the mass of the particle;
r is the distance of the particle from its axis of rotation;
&ohgr; is the angular frequency of the particle;
e is the electric charge of the particle;
E is the electric field strength; and
B
z
is the magnetic flux density of the field.
In a plasma centrifuge, it is general practice that the electric field will be directed radially inward. Stated differently, there is an increase in positive voltage with increased distance from the axis of rotation in the centrifuge. Under these conditions, the electric force F
E
will oppose the centrifugal force F
C
acting on the particle, and depending on the direction of rotation, the magnetic force either opposes or aids the outward centrifugal force. Accordingly, an equilibrium condition in a radial direction of the centrifuge can be expressed as:
&Sgr;F
r
=0 (positive direction radially outward) F
c
−F
E
−F
B
=0Mr&ohgr;
2
−eE
r
−er&ohgr;B
z
=0 (Eq. 1)
It is noted that Eq. 1 has two real solutions, one positive and one negative, namely:
ω
=
Ω
/
2
(
1
±
1
+
4
E
r
/
(
r
B
z
Ω
)
)
where
&OHgr;=eB
z
/M.
For a plasma centrifuge, the intent is to seek an equilibrium to create conditions in the centrifuge which allow the centrifugal forces, F
c
, to separate the particles from each other according to their mass. This happens because the centrifugal forces differ from particle to particle, according to the mass (M) of the particular particle. Thus, particles of heavier mass experience greater F
c
and move more toward the outside edge of the centrifuge than do the lighter mass particles which experience smaller centrifugal forces. The result is a distribution of lighter to heavier particles in a direction outward from the mutual axis of rotation. As is well known, however, a plasma centrifuge will not completely separate all of the particles in the aforementioned manner.
As an alternative to the plasma centrifuge, an apparatus which is structurally similar but which is operationally and functionally very dissimilar has been more recently developed. This alternative apparatus is referred to herein as a plasma mass filter and is fully disclosed in co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 09/192,945 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,096,220 for an invention of Ohkawa entitled “Plasma Mass Filter” which is assigned to the same assignee as the present invention. The fundamental difference between a plasma centrifuge and a plasma mass filter is that, unlike a plasma centrifuge which relies on collisions between the various ions as they are rotated in the plasma chamber, a plasma mass filter relies on the ability of the ions to orbit inside the plasma chamber. Thus, the basic principles of the separation are quite different.
As indicated above in connection with Eq. 1, a force balance can be achieved for all conditions when the electric field E is chosen to confine ions, and ions exhibit confined orbits. In a plasma filter, however, unlike a centrifuge, the electric field is chosen with the opposite sign to extract ions. The result is that ions of mass greater than a cut-off value, M
c
, are on unconfined orbits. The cut-off mass, M
c
, can be selected by adjusting the strength of the electric and magnetic fields. The basic features of the plasma filter can be described using the Hamiltonian formalism.
The total energy (potential plus kinetic) is a constant of the motion and is expressed by the Hamiltonian operator:
H=e&PHgr;+(P
R
2
+P
z
2
)/(2M)+(P
&thgr;
−e&PSgr;)
2
/(2Mr
2
)
where
P
R
=MV
R
, P
&thgr;
=MrV
&thgr;
+e&PSgr;, and P
z
=MV
z
are the respective components of the momentum and e&PHgr; is the potential energy. &PSgr;=r
2
B
z
/2 is related to the magnetic flux function and &PHgr;=&agr;&PSgr;+V
ctr
is the electric potential. E=−∇&PHgr; is the electric field which is chosen to be greater than zero for the filter case of interest. We can rewrite the Hamiltonian:
H=e&agr;r
2
B
z
/2+eV
ctr
+(P
R
2
+P
z
2
)/(2M)+(P
&thgr;
−er
2
B
z
/2)
2
/(2Mr
2
)
We assume that the parameters are not changing along the z axis, so both P
z
and P
&thgr;
are constants of the motion. Expanding and regrouping to put all of the constant terms on the left hand side gives:
H−eV
ctr
−P
z
2
/(2M)+P
&thgr;
&OHgr;/2=P
R
2
/(2M)+(P
&thgr;
2
/(2Mr
2
)+(M&OHgr;r
2
/2)(&OHgr;/4+&agr;)
where
&OHgr;=eB/M.
The last term is proportional to r
2
, so if &OHgr;/4+&agr;<0 then, since the second term decreases as 1/r
2
, P
R
2
must increase to keep the left-hand side constant as the particle moves out in radius. This leads to unconfined orbits for masses greater than the cut-off mass given by:
Mc=e(B
2
a)
2
/(8V
ctr
) where we used:
&agr;=(&PHgr;−V
ctr
)/&PSgr;=−2V
ctr
(a
2
B
z)
(Eq. 2)
and where a is the radius of the chamber.
So, for example, normalizing to the proton mass, M
p
, we can rewrite Eq. 2 to give the voltage required to put higher masses on loss orbits:
V
ctr
>1.2×10
−1
(a(m)B(gauss))
2
/(M
C
/M
P
)
Hence, a device radius of 1 m, a cutoff mass ratio of 100, and a magnetic field of 200 gauss require a voltage of 48 volts.
The same result for the cut-off mass can be obtained by looking at the simple force balance equation given by:
&Sgr;F
r
=0 (positive direction radially outward) F
c
+F
E
+F
B
=0Mr&ohgr;
2
+eEr−er&ohgr;B
z
=0 (Eq. 3)
which differs from Eq. 1 only by the sign of the electric field and has the solutions:
ω
=
Ω
/
2
(
1
±
1
-
4
E
/
(
r
B
z
Ω
)
)
so if 4E/r&OHgr;B
z
>1 then &ohgr; has imaginary roots and the force balance cannot be achieved. For a filter device with a cylinder radius “a”, a central voltage, V
ctr
, and zero voltage on the wall, the same expression for the cut-off mass is found to be:
M
C
=ea
2
B
z
2
/8V
ctr
(Eq. 4)
When the mass M of a charged particle is greater than the threshold value (M>M
c
), the particle will continue to move radially outwardly until it strikes the wall, whereas the lighter mass particles will be contained. The higher mass particles
Archimedes Technology Group, Inc.
Nydegger & Associates
Reifsnyder David A.
LandOfFree
Radial plasma mass filter does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Radial plasma mass filter, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Radial plasma mass filter will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2609622