Surgery – Diagnostic testing – Detecting brain electric signal
Reexamination Certificate
2009-05-14
2010-06-01
Nasser, Robert L (Department: 3735)
Surgery
Diagnostic testing
Detecting brain electric signal
C705S002000, C128S898000
Reexamination Certificate
active
07729755
ABSTRACT:
Methods for determining whether the brain activity of a human subject in response to a stimulus of interest or question of interest is characteristic of a state of interest, such as a deceptive state or a truthful state, are disclosed. Some methods include the use of control questions, including truthful control questions and deceptive control questions, to provide bases for comparison for responses to stimuli of interest or questions of interest. Some methods include the use of differences between two states, such as a deceptive state and a truthful state. In some methods, brain maps are generated and compared. Also disclosed are systems for detecting deception by measuring brain activity.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4941477 (1990-07-01), Farwell
patent: 5137027 (1992-08-01), Rosenfeld
patent: 5170780 (1992-12-01), Rosenfeld
patent: 5363858 (1994-11-01), Farwell
patent: 5406956 (1995-04-01), Farwell
patent: 5467777 (1995-11-01), Farwell
patent: 5564433 (1996-10-01), Thornton
patent: 5676138 (1997-10-01), Zawilinski
patent: 5876334 (1999-03-01), Levy
patent: 5957859 (1999-09-01), Rosenfeld
patent: 6167299 (2000-12-01), Galchenkov et al.
patent: 6453194 (2002-09-01), Hill
patent: 6754524 (2004-06-01), Johnson, Jr.
patent: 6854879 (2005-02-01), Pavlidis
patent: 6996256 (2006-02-01), Pavlidis
patent: 7111980 (2006-09-01), Pavlidis et al.
patent: 7565193 (2009-07-01), Laken
patent: 2002/0099295 (2002-07-01), Gil et al.
patent: 2005/0154290 (2005-07-01), Langleben
patent: 1138260 (2001-10-01), None
patent: WO-02/102238 (2002-12-01), None
patent: WO-03/049605 (2003-06-01), None
Adler et al., Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women, Health Psychology, 2000, pp. 586-592, 19(6).
Alary et al., Cortical activation associated with passive movements of the human index finger: an MEG study; NeuroImage, 2002, pp. 691-696, 15.
Annett, A classification of hand preference by association analysis, Br. J. Psychol., 1970, pp. 303-321, 61(3).
Ashburner et al., Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions, Human Brain Mapping, 1999, pp. 254-266, 7.
Babiloni et al., Human cortical EEG rhythms during long-term episodic memory task. A high-resolution EEG study of the HERA model, Neurolmage, 2004, pp. 1576-1584, 21.
Binder et al., Human brain language areas indentified by functional magnetic resonance imaging, J. Neurosci., 1997, pp. 353-362, 17(1).
Bush et al., The counting stroop: an interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging-validation study with functional MRI, Human Brain Mapping, 1998, pp. 270-282, 6.
Cohen et al., On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing count of the stroop effect, Psychological Rev., 1990, pp. 332-361, 97(3).
Collins et al., Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized talairach space, J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 1994, pp. 192-205, 18(2).
Collins et al., Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 1998, pp. 463-468, 17(3).
Cox, AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages, Comput. Biomed. Res., 1996, pp. 162-173, 29.
Critchley et al., Neural activity relating to generation and representation of galvanic skin conductance responses: A functional magnet resonance imaging study, The Journal of Neuroscience, 2000, pp. 3033-3040, 20(8).
Critchley et al., Volitional control of autonomic arousal: A functional magnetic resonance study, NeuroImage, 2002, pp. 909-919, 16.
Ekman et al., Invited article: face, voice, and body in detecting deceit, J. Nonverbal Behav., 1991, pp. 125-135, 15(2).
Elliott et al., Selective attention to emotional stimuli in a verbal go
o go task: an fMRI study, NeuroReport, 2000, pp. 1739-1744, 11(8).
Farwell et al., The truth will out: Interrogative polygraphy (“lie detection”) with event-related brain potentials, Psychophysiol., 1991, pp. 531-547, 28(5).
Feng et al., CBF changes during brain activation: fMRI vs. PET, NeuroImage, 2004, pp. 443-446, 22.
Fernandez et al., Language mapping in less than 15 minutes: Real-time functional MRI during routine clinical investigation, NeuroImage, 2001, pp. 585-594, 14.
Frackowiak et al., Human brain function, Academic Press, San Diego CA, 1997, pp. 487-517.
Friston et al., Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent, Human Brain Mapping, 1994, pp. 210-220, 1.
Friston et al., Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach, Human Brain Mapping, 1995, pp. 189-210, 2.
Furedy, Lie Detection as Psychophysiological differentiation: Some fine lines, Psychophysiology, 1986, pp. 683-701, The Guilford Press New York NY.
Ganis et al., Neural correlates of different types of deception: an fMRI investigation, Cerebral Cortex, Aug. 2003, pp. 830-836, vol. 13.
George et al., Blunted left cingulate activation in mood disorder subjects during a response interference task (the stroop), J. Neuropsychiatry, 1997, pp. 55-63, 9.
International Search Report for PCT/US05/20906, mailed May 17, 2007, 3 pages.
Kozel et al., A pilot study of functional magnetic resonance imaging brain correlates of deception in health young men, J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci., 2004, pp. 295-305, 16(3).
Kozel et al., A replication study of the neural correlates of deception, Behavioral Neuroscience, 2004, pp. 852-856, 118(4).
Kozel et al., Brain regions involved in deception: an fMRI study in healthy volunteers, J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci., 2001, p. 147, 13(1).
Kozel et al., Measuring brain changes associated with deception using 3T Bold functional MRI, abstract No. 455 presented at the 9th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, New York NY, 2003.
Lancaster et al., Automated labeling of the human brain: A preliminary report on the development and evaluation of a forward-transform method, Human Brain Mapping, 1997, pp. 238-242, 5.
Langleben et al., Brain activity during simulated deception: An event-related functional magnet resonance study, NeuroImage, 2002, pp. 727-732, V.15.
Lee et al., Detection of feigning memory impairment using functional MRI, Retrieved Jun. 14, 2006 from http://208.164.121.55/hbm2003/abstract/abstract187.htm.
Lee et al., Lie Detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging, Human Brain Mapping, 2002, pp. 157-164, 15(3).
Lorberbaum et al., Feasibility of using fMRI to study mothers responding to infant cries, Depression and Anxiety, 1999, pp. 99-104, 10.
Lubow et al., Pupillary size in response to a visual guilty knowledge test: New technique for the detection of deception, J. Exp. Psychol.: Applied, 1996, pp. 164-177, 2(2).
MacDonald et al., Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control, Science, 2000, pp. 1835-1838, 288.
Martin, Neuroanatomy, 2003, 3rd Edition, The McGraw-Hill Companies, pp. 377-407.
Mcgonigle et al., Variability in fMRI: An examination of intersession differences, NeuroImage, 2000, pp. 708-734, 11.
Moule et al., Amplification of xenon NMR and MRI by remote detection, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2003, pp. 9122-9127, 100(16).
Noguchi et al., An event-related optical topography study of cortical activatio induced by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation, NeuroImage, 2003, pp. 156-162, 19.
Nunez et al., Fabrication versus truth telling can be distinguished as a measure of cognitive load using fMRI in human subjects, Retrieved Jun. 14, 2006 from http://208.164.121.55/hbm2003/abstract/abstract488.htm.
O'Doherty et al., Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex, Nature Neurosci., 2001, pp. 95-102, 4(1).
Ogawa et al., Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contract dependent on blood oxygenation, Proc. Natl., Acad. Sci. USA, 1990, pp. 9868-9872, 87.
Oldfield, The assessment and analysis of handedness: The edinburgh inventory, Neuropsychologia, 1971, pp. 97-113, 9.
Pardo et al., Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emiss
Cephos Corp.
Nasser Robert L
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
LandOfFree
Questions and control paradigms for detecting deception by... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Questions and control paradigms for detecting deception by..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Questions and control paradigms for detecting deception by... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4242965