Quantum dots, semiconductor nanocrystals and semiconductor...

Details Quantum dots, semiconductor nanocrystals and semiconductor... Quantum dots, semiconductor nanocrystals and semiconductor...

2001-03-07

2003-10-14

Frech, Karl D. (Department: 2876)

Optics: measuring and testing

Document pattern analysis or verification

C235S454000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06633370

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to optical emitters and, in particular, to the use of semiconductor quantum dots, nanocrystals and particles as fluorescent coding elements.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Semiconductor quantum dots are simple inorganic solids typically consisting of a hundred to a hundred thousand atoms. They emit spectrally resolvable energies, have a narrow symmetric emission spectrum, and are excitable at a single wavelength. Semiconductor quantum dots have higher electron affinities than organic polymers, such as those used as hole conductors in current display technology. They offer a distinct advantage over conventional dye molecules in that they are capable of emitting multiple colors of light. In addition, semiconductor quantum dots are size tunable, and when used as luminescent centers for electron hole recombination for electroluminescent illumination, their emission color is also size tunable. Another advantage is that the quantum dots are photochemically stable under UV excitation. Reference in this regard may be had to an article entitled: “Semiconductor Nanocrystals as Fluorescent Biological Labels” (M.Bruchez Jr. et al, Science (281), 1998).
Because semiconductor quantum dots emit a narrow linewidth, are efficient emitters, and are tunable by their quantum size effect, they are suitable for coding, labeling and authentication, applications. Another advantage associated with semiconductor quantum dots, also referred to nanocrystals, is that they may be universally excited utilizing one UV source and therefore there is no need for multiple sources.
However, further investigation of the physical properties and interactions of quantum dots reveal some impediments to their use in practical applications.
One of the phenomena that quantum dots exhibit is chromophore tuning related to their quantum size, known as the “Quantum Size Effect”. Dyes utilizing nanocrystals are exemplary systems for testing the “particle in 1-D box” model of quantum mechanics as shown in FIG.
1
. This is because, among other things, they exhibit absorption and emission characteristics and may be optically directed with nonlinear optics (e.g. X
(3)
).
Reference in this regard may be had to Kuhn, H.:
Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products
, ed. by D. L .Zechmeister, Vol. 16 (Springer, Wien 1959) p.17, and also to Försterling, H. D., H. Kuhn:
Physikalische Chemie in Experimenten
. Ein Praktikum (Verlag Chemie, Weinheim/Bergstr.1971) p.373.
As an example, thiacyanine dyes (MW~600 a.m.u.) with a quantum dot size (a) of approximately 1.5 nm, and an emission wavelength (&lgr;) of 500 nm, exhibit the characteristics shown in equations 1 and 2 of FIG.
2
.
However, there are limits to the tunability that may be achieved by the quantum size effect. It is well known that the energy gap and excitation emission can be tuned by size according to equation 3 shown in FIG.
2
. However, electrons and holes have “collisions” with the walls and broaden the excitation line (&ugr;) according to equation 4, where V
F
is a Fermi velocity ~10
5
m/sec.
For example, using the quantum dot size of a=4 nm, the change in the excitation line (&Dgr;&ugr;v) would be 2.5×10
13
with a corresponding wavelength spread (&Dgr;&lgr;) of 30 nm at 600 nm. A quantum dot size of 2 nm exhibits a wavelength spread (&Dgr;&lgr;) of 60 nm at 600 nm.
In general, quantum dots smaller than 2 nm will have emission lines broader than dyes, as shown in FIG.
3
.
As the quantum size shifts, the ratio of the shift in size and the resulting change in line width is shown in equation 5 of FIG.
2
. When the shift to width ratio becomes unity, tuning is no longer effective for coding. The quantum size resulting in a shift to width ratio of 1 is 4 nm, as determined by equation
6
of FIG.
2
. Thus, quantum dots larger than 4 nm will have shifts less then the emission linewidth.
In summary of the analysis of the characteristics of semiconductor quantum dots thus far, when coding and labeling with semiconductor nanocrystals or quantum dots, the following considerations should be taken into account:
1) The room temperature linewidth is approximately 30 nm (2.5×10
13
sec
−1
) as opposed to dyes which typically have 40-60 nm linewidths.
2) Separate peaks require 2&sgr; separation of approximately 60 nm as opposed to dyes with 90 nm separation requirements.
3) A code density of 2
M
−1 may be achieved where M is the number of resolvable quantum dot emission peaks.
Combinatorial coding with quantum dots also presents complications related to trap states. Quantum dots have broad secondary peaks joining the excitonic emission as shown in FIG.
4
. At 30% quantum efficiency, this broad peak has an amplitude half as high as the narrow 20 nm wide emission. As a result, the overlapping broad peaks restrict combinatorial coding with quantum dots even more than dyes.
Another factor to be considered when utilizing semiconductor quantum dots for coding and labeling applications is that the quantum efficiency of a quantum dot is affected by the interaction of carriers with the surfaces of the quantum dot. Surface atoms are not a bulk phase and are not generally amenable to lattice matched passivation (e.g., ZnS shell).
Reference in this regard may be had to “Quantum Dot Bioconjugates for Ultrasensitive Nonisotopic Detection”, by Chan, W. C., Nie, S., Science, 281(5385):2016.
The ratio of surface atoms to bulk in a quantum dot is shown by equation 7 of
FIG. 5
, where d is a lattice constant. For a quantum size of 3 nm and a lattice constant of 0.3 nm, the ratio N
s
/N
b
from equation 7 is approximately 30-40%, and therefore the quantum efficiency is approximately equal to R. Thus, the smaller the quantum dot, the lower the quantum efficiency, which further limits size tuning.
Semiconductor nanocrystals and quantum dots typically have quantum efficiencies of 5%-25% after some form of passivation. They are primarily comprised of surface or interface atoms which trap photo-carriers in picoseconds and relax with microsecond decays. This slow decay makes even their pulsed (flash lamp) excitation saturate at I
s
=10 KW/cm
2
. This is in contrast to dye chromophores which have 30%-95% quantum efficiencies, for example, I
s
~MW/cm
2
, and may in some instances produce amplification.
A comparison of the light output of quantum dots and dye chromophores may be made using the following relationships shown in FIG.
5
. The fluorescent output is shown by equation 8, the saturation intensity (I
s
) is shown by equation 9, and the maximum output (I
o
~I
s
) is derived from equation 10. The ratio of light output from a dye and quantum dots (Dye/QD) is approximately 3×10
3
as shown by equation 11.
It has been stated in prior art publications that the fluorescence intensity of a single quantum dot is equivalent to that of approximately 20 rhodamine molecules. However, when compared on an equivalent molecular weight basis, the results are quite different. For example, a comparison of a quantum dot structure with a CdSe core (excluding the ZnS shell) having a mass of approximately 100,000 a.m.u. with a Rhodamine6G (R6G) molecule having a mass of approximately 500 a.m.u., shows a relative intensity ratio (I
R6G
/I
QD
)of 10 when compared on an equivalent molecular weight basis.
While quantum dots are known to be photochemically stable under UV excitation, the utilization of UV sources involves some disadvantages including UV decomposition of synthesis products, singlet O
2
generation and reactions, and energetic recombination, trapping and photodegradation of the nanocrystals.
Another aspect of the photo-stability of semiconductor quantum dots to be considered is photo-darkening. Occurrences of photo-darkening are known in the applications utilizing semiconductor quantum dots, particularly with glass-based and polymer passivation. This is further complicated by the fact that the degree of passivation may not be universal or consistent and thus may vary with each semiconductor. This is dis

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Quantum dots, semiconductor nanocrystals and semiconductor... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Quantum dots, semiconductor nanocrystals and semiconductor..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Quantum dots, semiconductor nanocrystals and semiconductor... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3127169