Quantum cipher communication system

Cryptography – Communication system using cryptography

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C380S256000, C380S278000, C380S279000, C713S150000

Reexamination Certificate

active

09787029

ABSTRACT:
A quantum cipher communication system includes a sender's apparatus, a recipient's apparatus and a transmission path. The sender's apparatus includes a beam splitting for splitting a laser beam into a weak signal light and an intense reference light, a phase modulation unit for imparting a phase change on either the weak signal light or the intense reference light. The recipient's apparatus includes a phase modulation unit for imparting a phase change on either the weak signal light or the intense reference light, a superimposing unit for superimposing the weak signal light and the intense reference light, a pair of photoconductive diodes for converting two output lights from the superimposing unit into electric signals, and an amplifying unit for amplifying a difference signal between the electric signals, wherein the recipient assigns bit values by comparing the difference signal with threshold values.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4916305 (1990-04-01), Antell
patent: 5007106 (1991-04-01), Kahn et al.
patent: 5086349 (1992-02-01), Okayama et al.
patent: 5307410 (1994-04-01), Bennett
patent: 5339182 (1994-08-01), Kimble et al.
patent: 5515438 (1996-05-01), Bennett et al.
patent: 5663793 (1997-09-01), de Groot
patent: 5665423 (1997-09-01), Lee
patent: 5675648 (1997-10-01), Townsend
patent: 5732139 (1998-03-01), Lo et al.
patent: 5953421 (1999-09-01), Townsend
patent: 6188768 (2001-02-01), Bethune et al.
patent: 6272224 (2001-08-01), Mazourenko et al.
patent: 08-139701 (1996-05-01), None
patent: WO 9408409 (1994-04-01), None
M.J. Werner and G. J. Milburn. Eavesdropping using quantum-nondemolition measurements. Department of Physics, University of Queensland, Australia. vol. 47, No. 1, p. 639-641.
H. Bartelt and K. H. Brenner. The Wigner Distribution Function—An Alternate Signal Representation in Optics. 1980. Physikalisches Institut der Universitat Erlangen. p. 260-262.
Samuel Braunstein, “Homodyne Statistics”, Jul. 1990, Physical Review A, vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 474-481.
Hirano et al, “Quantum cryptography using balanced homodyne detection”, Sep. 5, 2004, pp. 1-5.
Hansen et al, “Ultrasensitive pulsed, balanced homodyne detector: application to time-domain quantum measurements”, Nov. 1, 2001, Optics Letters, vol. 26, No. 21., pp. 1714-1716.
Barnett et al, “Eavesdropping strategies and rejected-data protocols in quantum cryptography”, Journal of Mordern Optics, 1993, vol. 40, No. 12, pp. 2501-2513.
Paul Townsend, “Secure Communications on Passive Optical networks Using Quantum Cryptography”, 22nd European Conference on Optical Communication, 1996, pp. 3.35-3.38.
Charles Bennett, “Quantum Cryptography Using Any Two Nonorthogonal States”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 68, No. 21, May 25, 1992, pp. 3121-3124.
Goldenberg et al, “Physical Review Letters”, vol. 75, No. 7, Aug. 14, 1995, pp. 1239-1243.
Bennett et al, “Generalized Privacy Amplification”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 41, No. 6, Nov. 1996, pp. 1915-1923.
M. J. Werner, G.J. Milburn; “Eavesdropping using quanturn-nondemolition measurements”, Physcial Review A, vol. 47, No. 1 (1993) p. 639-641.
H.Bartelt, K.-H.Brenner; “The Wigner Distribution Function An Alternative Signal Represetion in Optics”, Israel Journal of Technology, vol. 18, No. 5 (1980) p. 260-262.
Fukushima S., Kaibuchi, S., “Shinpan: Tsuu-fibaa Tsuushin”, Kabushiki Kaisha Denkitsuuchin Gijutsu Nyuusu Sha (Dec. 12, 1981), p. 252-3.
C. Marand, P.D. Townsend; “Quantum key distribution over distances as long as 30km.”, Optics Letter, vol. 20, No. 12 (1995) p. 1695-1697.
Yi Mu, Yuliang Zheng, Yan-Xia Lin; “Multi-User Quantum Cryptography” International Symposium on Information Theory & Its Application 1994, vol. 1 (1994) p. 245-250.
B.A. Slutsky, R. Rao, P.-C.Run, Y. Fainman; : “Security of cryptography aganist individual attacks”, Physical Review A, vol. 57, No. 4 (1998) p. 2383-2398.
Hideaki Matsueda; “Quantum Cryptography”, The Journal of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, vol. 81, No. 3 (1998) p. 225-320.
John F. Clauser et al., “Experimental consequences of objective local theories”, Physical Review D, vol. 10, No. 2, Jul. 15, 1974, pp. 526-535.
R. Namiki et al. “Security of quantum cryptography using balanced homodyne detection”, The American Physical Society, Physicial Review A 67, Feb. 24, 2003, pp. 022308-1 to 022308-7.
R. Namiki et al, “Practical Limitation for Continuous-Variable Quantum Cryptography using Coherent States”, The American Physical Society, Physical Review Letters, vol. 92, No. 11, Mar. 16, 2004, pp. 117901-1 to 117091-4.
Mathematical Science pp. 53-61 (No. 42, Dec. 1996) with corresponding English translation (from line 4 from the bottom at right column on p. 56 to Fig. 4 on 58).

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Quantum cipher communication system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Quantum cipher communication system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Quantum cipher communication system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3853809

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.