Locks – Special application – For control and machine elements
Reexamination Certificate
2001-02-23
2003-04-29
Sandy, Robert J. (Department: 3677)
Locks
Special application
For control and machine elements
C070S451000, C070S461000, C070S465000, C070S468000, C070S472000, C070S476000, C070S478000, C070S481000, C070S482000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06553799
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates generally to lock assemblies used to secure doors. More particularly, the present invention relates to a push button door locking mechanism developed for a hybrid lock and architecture designed to incorporate the functionality of a cylindrical lock architecture with the ease of installation of a tubular lock architecture.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
There are currently two main types of lock architectures in widespread use today. These lock architectures are typically known as the cylindrical lock and the tubular lock designs. Each of these designs has advantages and disadvantages in comparison to the other.
While there are variations, traditionally, a cylindrical lock consists of a chassis, an inside mounting plate, an outside mounting plate and rose, an inside rose, a fixed backset latch, an inside and outside knob/lever, and mounting screws. The fundamental workings of the cylindrical lock provide the conversion of rotational motion of the knob/lever to linear motion—within the chassis housing—to retract the latch. The typical cylindrical lock architecture uses a drawbar occupying the axis of the latch bore. The cylindrical lock architecture typically is more expensive to manufacture, but allows more functional variations than a tubular lock and generally provides better security. The chassis has a fixed spindle-end to spindle-end length which easily accommodates a push-button locking mechanism, however this also results in a varying distance from the end of the knob/lever to the surface of the door when used with different door thicknesses. Installation of a cylindrical lock is generally more complicated than that of a tubular lock. During installation of the cylindrical lock, the inside knob/lever, rose, and mounting plate need to be removed. The chassis needs to be centered in the door by adjusting the outside rose. Additionally, the design constraints inherent in the cylindrical architecture make it impossible to have a dual backset latch which does not require some type of adjustment. Where available, these adjustable backsets used in cylindrical locks are failure-prone and inferior to fixed backset latches.
A tubular lock architecture traditionally consists of an inside chassis complete with a rose and a knob/lever attached, an outside chassis also complete with a rose and a knob/lever attached, a latch, and mounting screws. This simple design allows for easy and quick installation of the tubular lock design with virtually no adjustment required. Due to its simplicity, the tubular architecture also provides a cost advantage over the cylindrical lock. The tubular lock design also provides a fixed distance from the surface of the door to the end of the lever even when used with different door thicknesses. The tubular lock architecture converts rotational motion of the knob/lever to linear motion within the latch in order to retract the latch. Accordingly, a drawbar occupies the axis of the latch bore. However, due to the edge bore of a door preparation, the amount of latch retraction is restricted. Other problems are found in that design constraints make it impossible to design a consistently functioning push button lock because of the chassis datum on the surface of the door. Since the door thickness variation is considerably greater than the push button linear travel, no direct means are available to provide a secure consistent locking action. The tubular lock architecture is also generally less secure than a cylindrical lock architecture.
Accordingly, there remains a need in the art for a lock architecture which combines the advantages of both the tubular lock architecture and the cylindrical lock architecture along with other advantages, while minimizing or removing the limitations existing in each of the prior art designs. Accordingly, a suitable alternative is provided including features more fully disclosed hereinafter.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a push button door locking mechanism developed with a new lock architecture configuration designed to incorporate the functionality of a cylindrical lock architecture with the ease of installation of a tubular lock architecture. These and other improvements are provided by a push button door locking mechanism comprising a push button mounted on a push button carrier housed within an inside spindle of a door lock assembly. A main retractor is co-rotatingly attached to the inside spindle. A locking catch assembly having a head portion on a first end thereof wherein the head portion matingly attaches to the push button carrier, and a locking catch engageable against the retractor component in a manner preventing axial movement of the locking catch assembly. A push button spring biases the locking catch assembly in an unlocked position.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a new lock architecture configuration with a push button door locking mechanism designed to incorporate the functionality of a cylindrical lock architecture with the ease of installation of a tubular lock architecture. These and other improvements are provided by a lock assembly for a door comprising a chassis assembly mounted in a bore of the door including an inside chassis assembly and an outside chassis assembly. The inside chassis assembly and the outside chassis assembly are telescopically engaged to accommodate different door widths. A door latch assembly is operably connected to the chassis assembly for retraction and extension of a bolt. A handle is mounted on a spindle on either side of the chassis assembly. Each side of the chassis assembly has a fixed spindle end to door length regardless of variations in the door thickness. The lock assembly further comprises a push button locking mechanism along a central rotational axis of the chassis assembly.
REFERENCES:
patent: 2435238 (1948-02-01), Schlage
patent: 2611635 (1952-09-01), Cerf, Jr.
patent: 2738666 (1956-03-01), Tornoe
patent: 3823585 (1974-07-01), Spon
patent: 4615549 (1986-10-01), Couture
patent: 4957315 (1990-09-01), Lin
patent: 4998760 (1991-03-01), Nixon et al.
patent: 5177987 (1993-01-01), Shen
patent: 5216908 (1993-06-01), Malvy
patent: 5269162 (1993-12-01), Robida
patent: 5364139 (1994-11-01), Bergen et al.
patent: 5484179 (1996-01-01), Mader
patent: 5598726 (1997-02-01), Cordle
patent: 5657653 (1997-08-01), Hensley et al.
patent: 5816086 (1998-10-01), Russell
patent: 5941108 (1999-08-01), Shen
patent: 6101856 (2000-08-01), Pelletier et al.
patent: 6223567 (2001-05-01), Fadul
patent: 6279360 (2001-08-01), Shen
patent: 6357270 (2002-03-01), Vazquez
Bates Peter K.
Bradley Truman
Hendrickson Thor
Pompeii Dario L.
Lugo Carlos
Michael & Best & Friedrich LLP
Sandy Robert J.
Schlage Lock Company
LandOfFree
Push button door locking mechanism does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Push button door locking mechanism, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Push button door locking mechanism will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3034430