Pump liner

Expansible chamber devices – Cylinder detail – Nonmetallic piston contacting portion

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

06463843

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to reciprocating pumps, such as pumps of the duplex or triplex type and, more specifically, to liners for use in such pumps.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In certain applications, corrosive or abrasive fluids (for example, oil well drilling fluid, commonly known as “mud”), must be pumped. Pumps used in these applications are reciprocating pumps typically of the duplex or triplex type provided with two or three cylinders, as the case may be, a piston being reciprocally disposed in each cylinder. Each cylinder communicates with a suction and discharge valve equipped chamber located at what is commonly referred to as the fluid end of the pump so that, as the piston is reciprocated by the piston rod, drilling fluid will be ultimately drawn into and discharged from the working chambers. Since the material pumped is of an abrasive character, and frequently corrosive as well, wear on the piston and cylinder wall is quite severe, and it has been common practice, in order to more easily repair a worn pump, to provide each cylinder with a replaceable steel liner that reciprocably supports the piston in the cylinder. Nevertheless, the abrasive fluid—e.g., mud—results in a relatively short lifetime of the liner and the piston, necessitating frequent replacement. It will be apparent that because of the abrasive nature of the fluids being pumped, the liner must have a hard interior surface. Additionally, because the pressures and forces that act on the liner are extreme, the liner is typically quite large and heavy.
Attempts to address the issue of making a liner that resists abrasion and corrosion and that is economical are numerous. As illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 5,617,773, incorporated herein by reference for all purposes, the industry has generally settled on a dual-metal pump liner having an abrasive and corrosive-resistant inner sleeve and a machinable outer shell. One such liner is centrifugally cast, wherein a carbon steel outer shell is cast on the spinning mold and a high-chrome steel is then poured into the interior of a hot outer shell. Upon cooling, the result is a metallurgical bond between the inner sleeve and the outer shell, and the liner has a hard inner surface and a machinable outer surface. However, critical spinning speeds, pour temperatures, and other parameters make such a liner process expensive and the liners difficult to make. Another method that has been used in the manufacturing of liners is a shrink fit, wherein the carbon steel shell is heated and the high chrome sleeve is cooled. The two are then press-fitted together. Upon reaching a common temperature, the sleeve has expanded and the shell has shrunk, thus creating a tight fit. Still other attempts have been made at static casting the steel shell in the sleeve; however, that method was abandoned as a failure because the brittle sleeve tended to crack.
Thus, there remains a need for a pump liner that is corrosion- and abrasion-resistant, that can withstand the pressures and forces exerted on the liner, and that is lightweight to permit easier field installation.
In copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/330,448, there is disclosed a pump liner wherein the shell is made of a composite material. As disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application, the pump liners were constructed primarily by using the sleeve as a mandrel to form the shell around the sleeve in situ. While pump liners of this construction are suitable in certain applications, it has been found that in certain cases, and depending upon the construction of the pump liner, failure problems can occur. Specifically, it was noted that if the sleeve were made, as it frequently is, of a material exhibiting negligible elasticity, e.g., less than 1% elongation, the sleeve would fracture under the high pressures. In this regard, it is to be noted that most reinforcing fillers and/or materials used to form the composite shell present much greater elasticity, e.g., they exhibit elongation greater than 1%, and frequently 4 to 6%.
In mud pumps of the type under consideration, the pressures are quite high at the fluid end of the pump. Accordingly, regardless of the construction of the pump liner, e.g., whether or not the inner sleeve and the outer shell are both of metal and are essentially two separate pieces, provision must be made to ensure that the high pressures at the fluid end of the pump do not force the sleeve out of the shell.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a pump liner that makes use of composites.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a pump liner that is lightweight relative to prior art pump liners.
The above and other objects of the present invention will become apparent from the drawings, the description given herein, and the appended claims.
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a pump liner comprising a tubular sleeve having an inner corrosion- and abrasion-resistant sleeve surface and an outer sleeve surface, and a shell having an outer shell surface and an inner shell surface, the inner shell surface being in surface-to-surface engagement with the outer sleeve surface, the shell comprising a reinforcing filler supported in a polymeric matrix selected from the group consisting of thermoplastic resins, thermosetting resins, and mixtures thereof.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a pump liner comprising (i) a tubular sleeve having an inner sleeve surface of a corrosion- and abrasion-resistant material and an outer sleeve surface, the outer sleeve surface being frustoconical, and (ii) a shell in surrounding relationship to the tubular sleeve, the shell having an outer shell surface and an inner shell surface, the inner shell surface being frustoconical and complementary to the outer sleeve surface. In a preferred case, the outer sleeve surface and the inner shell surface are in interference engagement.


REFERENCES:
patent: 970903 (1910-09-01), Fennell
patent: 1788950 (1931-01-01), Heiner
patent: 2094254 (1937-09-01), Brubaker
patent: 3678811 (1972-07-01), Penwell
patent: 3769880 (1973-11-01), Mirjanic
patent: 3880055 (1975-04-01), Nakamura et al.
patent: 4300439 (1981-11-01), Degnan et al.
patent: 4315454 (1982-02-01), Knobel
patent: 4389921 (1983-06-01), Bush
patent: 4453454 (1984-06-01), Comer
patent: 4466399 (1984-08-01), Hinz et al.
patent: 4516479 (1985-05-01), Vadasz
patent: 4603062 (1986-07-01), Ecer
patent: 4715313 (1987-12-01), Ecer
patent: 4746554 (1988-05-01), Ecer
patent: 4971846 (1990-11-01), Lundy
patent: 5061159 (1991-10-01), Pryor
patent: 5080056 (1992-01-01), Kramer et al.
patent: 5415079 (1995-05-01), Ching
patent: 5513954 (1996-05-01), Bourgeois
patent: 5617773 (1997-04-01), Craft et al.
patent: 5740788 (1998-04-01), Atmur et al.
patent: 5829405 (1998-11-01), Goedel
patent: 6230610 (2001-05-01), Pippert
patent: 804387 (1951-04-01), None
patent: 2522082 (1983-08-01), None

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Pump liner does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Pump liner, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Pump liner will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2966714

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.