Electrical generator or motor structure – Dynamoelectric – Rotary
Reexamination Certificate
1999-11-15
2001-08-07
Enad, Elvin (Department: 2834)
Electrical generator or motor structure
Dynamoelectric
Rotary
C310S273000, C250S42300F
Reexamination Certificate
active
06271614
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND—FIELD OF INVENTION
This invention relates to spark control on the commutator, specifically zero spark suppression whereby full cycle sparking and plasma streams with resultant charge clusters, radiation, electromotive force, discrete wave and discrete particle generation are achieved.
BACKGROUND—DESCRIPTION OF PRIOR ART
All previous commutators used in DC motors or generators have been designed to reduce sparking by elaborate means whereby no examples are referable as similar, only contrary by means. Traditional design goals have been to reduce commutator sparking, yet complete suppression seems to be mythical. The common physical effects include hysteresis, inductive and conductive heating in the armature and rotor facilitating the need for heavy gauge 600 degree insulated conductors, special heat resistant bonding agents, and air flow cooling means which further reduces efficiency. Sparking by itself adds to commutator erosion and added heating, also requiring cooling. Counter electromotive force, generally referred to as counter-EMF is evident in both modern and historic patent designs and has been considered something to avoid. Likewise the effects of the Collapsing Magnetic Field, further referred to as CMF, is caused when a complete break in the circuit occurs at the commutator resulting in conductor erosion and copious heat production.
(a) When a motor/generator uses laminate steel as an armature or coil support, it is these laminates which add useless weight, carry eddy currents & interfere with permanent and generated magnetic fields.
(b) Counter-EMF also contributes to magnetic braking which requires additional current to drive the motor to required speed.
(c) Past motor/generator design had only low flux density magnets available to them, requiring application of greater currents to drive the electromagnetic fields. This resulted in high internal heat which proved problematic for the high BH.sub.max permanent magnets otherwise known as neodymium iron boron, having a relative low curie point.
(d) U.S. Pat. No. 5,861,693 Takahashi: Yoshiaki (Jan. 19, 1999) is for a motor using now conventional components such as high BH.sub.max permanent magnets, however its use of steel laminates causes drag within the high strength magnetic fields, creating useless heat and further built-in inefficiencies to overcome. Furthermore his use of induction coils to produce electricity is not new as evidenced in U.S. Pat. 5,661,354 to Burtis; Wilson A. (Aug. 26, 1997), U.S. Pat. No. 5,408,165 to Voet; Eduard J. (Apr. 18, 1995) and U.S. Pat. No. 4,720,662 to Lanser; Leslie V. (Jan. 19, 1988) . These methods seem to rely on the lines of force from the permanent magnetic field cutting through the conductor to produce a flow of current as in a standard generator. This is known and indicated by Takashi when he states, a lower power consumption by omitting the induction coil from the above mentioned motor.
(e) In U.S. Pat. No. 5,208,844 to Puthoff: Harold E(Austin, Tex.); Church,Jr.; George W.(San Antonio, Tex.); Clifton; David B.(Leander, Tex.); Little; Scott R. (Austin, Tex.) (May 4, 1993) and U.S. Pat. 5,153,901 to Shoulders; Kenneth R.(Austin Tex.) (Oct. 6, 1992) we find the use of voltages at a high potential, near 30 KeV and bulky equipment are needed to produce charged particle clusters, radiation, Electrum Validum or EV and possible Nuclear Electrum Validum or NEV effects, however system charge times are not mentioned and presumed slow. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,034,183 to Blewett; John P. (Jul. 23, 1991) it states that tritium production occurs as well as producing anti-protons at multi-GeV energies, specifically anti-hydrogen.
(f) U.S. Pat. No. 512,340 to Tesla; Nikola (Jan. 9, 1894) and U.S. Pat. No. 685,957 to Tesla; Nikola (Dec. 5, 1901) might be of use herein, however my system is not limited to DC motor operation, it also has means for sub-atomic particle discovery.
SUMMARY INCLUDING OBJECTS AND ADVANTAGES
A pulsed plasma electromagnetic motor, comprises a novel commutator, a hermetically sealed plasma area, energy sensors, a pulsed plasma flow of voltage allowing DC motor operation, charged particle clusters, discrete particles, discrete waves, having means of radiated energy retrieval, x-ray transmission and anti-matter factors are present.
OBJECTS AND ADVANTAGES
Accordingly, several objects and advantages of my invention are the novel use of unsuppressed sparking to generate a multitude of heretofore unrealized effects in an electromagnetic motor of unique properties using a standard coil and rotor design. This novel approach insures absolute zero spark suppression, thereby allowing a pulsed field motor/generator to access heretofore unavailable energies from the CMF as well as now useful counter-EMF forces which have caused commutator destruction as far back as the first electric motor in circa 1835. This unique electrical transmission means allows advantages far in advance of simple use in motor/generators. High energy particle division and associated transmutation at sub-GeV, even sub KeV applied energies now seems possible.
The phrase “motor/generator is being used to describe a device which produces power during a part of the operating cycle when no active drive power is applied to the system. Harnessing that power would increase the efficiency of the machine, or the power could be directed to a secondary device.
Still further objects and advantages will become apparent from a consideration of the ensuing description and accompanying drawings. Other possible effects are the generation of positrons, anti-matter, gravity waves, magnetic vortexes and an altered space-time reference from one or more of the following; rotating magnetic fields, pulsed magnetic field, EV and emitted radiation resultant of charged particle clusters, Electromagnetic Pulse or EMP and regenerative means, CMF and counter-EMF containment in a resonant circuit, eddy current suppression. Regardless of theory, the groundbreaking discovery of negative Entropy or heat loss has been evidenced therewith repeatedly in the system.
(a) The use of steel laminates near high BH.sub.max magnets, results in system drag as these magnets are attracted to even stainless steel, thereby laminate use is to be avoided. As magnetic attraction to aluminum, copper and other metals is evident, the novel use of non-conductive support elements is suggested, whereby hysteresis and eddy currents can not propagate. Support elements include coil supports, housing & core elements. Use of extraneous conductors should be limited to standard exterior RF shielding as required, however this may be at a distance depending on requirements, in example a test room shield.
(b) Previous commutation means lead to suppress counter-EMF as it causes magnetic braking which must be overcome by applying higher driving currents to counter its effects, thus causing an increase in system heating resulting in, removal means and requiring excess insulation and increased wire gauge. Whereas my novel commutator not only refuses to neutralize counter-EMF but transmutes its use into increased system performance, whereby small wire gauge transmission means are possible as current flow is restricted within this system and even substantial lengths of fine 38 GA wire can be used with minimal thermal radiation, and at times remission.
(c) High BH.sub.max permanent magnets with a field strength higher than 36 MGOe such as 50 MGOe, 100 MGOe and higher are required for specific function in my devices.
(d) Induction coils as such are not used, the function of the receiving coils are to collect discrete and tuned energies radiated from the pulsed electromagnetic field and should be positioned at a distance, not to interfere with but receive the signal for transformation. The receiving coil can envelope the drive coil or be placed adjacent to it, whereby under direct short circuit should not cause substantial drag on the magnetic core due to induction, as this is not its main energy collection goal.
(e) Whereas others use KeV and GeV charges to attain particle separa
Enad Elvin
Jones Judson H.
LandOfFree
Pulsed plasma drive electromagnetic motor generator does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Pulsed plasma drive electromagnetic motor generator, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Pulsed plasma drive electromagnetic motor generator will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2514878