Gas separation: processes – With control responsive to sensed condition – Pressure sensed
Reexamination Certificate
1999-10-21
2001-08-07
Spitzer, Robert H. (Department: 1724)
Gas separation: processes
With control responsive to sensed condition
Pressure sensed
C095S023000, C095S096000, C095S102000, C095S130000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06270556
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a process of the PSA type, and more particularly of the VSA type, for separating a gas stream, in particular a gas stream containing essentially oxygen and nitrogen, such as air, the production output and the production pressure of which are variable and adjustable over time.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The gases in air, such as especially oxygen and nitrogen, are of great industrial importance, especially in the fields of papermaking or glassmaking.
One of the non-cryogenic techniques used for producing these gases is the technique called “PSA” (standing for Pressure Swing Adsorption), which technique covers not only the strictly speaking PSA processes, but also the similar processes such as the VSA (Vacuum Swing Adsorption) and the MPSA (Mixed Pressure Swing Adsorption) processes.
According to this PSA technique, when the gas mixture to be separated is air and the component to be recovered is oxygen, the oxygen is separated from the gas mixture by means of preferential adsorption of at least the nitrogen on a material preferentially adsorbing at least nitrogen and subjected to given pressure cycles in the separation zone.
The oxygen, not being adsorbed or only slightly so, is recovered as output from the separation zone; in general, this has a purity greater than 90%, or even greater than 93%.
More generally, a PSA process for the non-cryogenic separation of a gas mixture comprising a first component that is preferentially adsorbed on an adsorbent material and a second component less preferentially adsorbed on the adsorbent material than the first component, for the purpose of producing the second component, comprises, in a cyclic manner:
a step of preferential adsorption of at least the first component on the adsorbent material at an adsorption pressure called “high pressure”, with recovery of at least some of the second component thus produced;
a step of desorption of the first component, thus trapped by the adsorbent, at a desorption pressure below the adsorption pressure, called “low pressure”;
a step of recompression of the separation zone comprising the adsorbent, by going from the low pressure to the high pressure.
However, it is known that the efficiency of separation of a gas mixture, such as air, depends on many parameters, especially the high pressure, the low pressure, the type of adsorbent material used and the affinity of the latter for the components to be separated, the composition of the gas mixture to be separated, the adsorption temperature of the mixture to be separated, the size of the adsorbent particles, the composition of these particles and the temperature gradient established inside the bed of adsorbent.
Currently, zeolites are the adsorbents most used in PSA processes. The zeolite particles usually contain monovalent, divalent and/or trivalent metal cations, for example cations of alkali metals, alkaline-earth metals, transition metals and/or lanthanides, these cations being incorporated during the synthesis of the zeolite particles and/or inserted subsequently using an ion-exchange technique, that is to say, in general, by bringing the unexchanged or raw zeolite particles into contact with a solution of one or more metal salts comprising the cation or cations to be incorporated into the zeolitic structure and subsequently recovering the particles of exchanged zeolite, that is to say of zeolite containing a given amount of metal cations. By way of example, mention may be made of zeolites of type X or LSX (Low Silica X) containing more than 80%, or even more than 90%, of metal cations such as, especially, lithium, calcium and/or zinc cations.
Such zeolites are especially described in documents EP-A-486,384, EP-A-606,848, EP-A-589,391, EP-A-589,406, EP-A-548,755, EP-A-109,063 and EP-A-760,248.
However, a recurrent concern in gas production using the PSA process, and in particular the VSA process, is to be able to offer the customer or the site using the gas produced, such as a combustion furnace for example, various combinations of production output and production pressure depending on the requirements and/or needs specific to this customer or this user site, and to do so by means of a standard PSA, particularly VSA, apparatus or unit installed on the site.
In other words, to be able, beyond a chosen nominal operating point of the PSA unit, to optimally adapt to the fluctuations in demand by the customer or the user site, so as to guarantee acceptable performance and an acceptable production cost from an industrial standpoint, despite the fluctuations in demand.
To do this, it is common practice to control the PSA or VSA unit so as to be able to obtain the combinations of production output and production pressure that are desired by the customer.
There is considerable teaching in the prior art concerning the control of PSA, particularly VSA, processes which make it possible to respond, at a given industrial unit, to changes in production gas consumption without inordinately affecting the overall energy consumption of the process.
Thus, a first known type of control is based on the introduction of a dead time, of constant or variable duration, into the production cycle, as described especially in documents EP-A-458,350 and EP-A-819,463.
During this dead time, the adsorbers are isolated, the machines operating with no load, and the intended objective is therefore to improve the energy consumption which, in the absence of this dead time, would be degraded in direct proportion to the reduction in the output consumed.
However, it turns out that this type of control allows specific energy degradation during reduced operation of the PSA, particularly VSA, unit to be limited only very partially. Thus, for a production of 50% of the nominal output of a VSA unit, the specific energy is degraded by more than 30% compared with the nominal value.
Furthermore, for batch production processes, especially in the case of a VSA unit having one or two adsorbers, there is necessarily a reduction in the pressure of the production gas output by the VSA, which must be compensated for by additional compression downstream of the unit.
In other words, the pressure variation DP in the production capacity is, for batch production units, for example of the MPSA type, such that:
DP
=
DP
0
·
(
T
c
-
d
)
·
(
T
c
+
Y
)
T
0
·
(
T
0
-
d
+
Y
)
where:
DP
0
is the difference between the extreme pressures in nominal operation;
T
c
is the cycle time or duration (in seconds)
d is the time (in seconds) during which there is no production; and
Y is the duration (in seconds) of the reduced-operation dead time.
In other words, in most cases, this type of control with introduction of dead time may not be sufficient by itself to maintain a perfectly constant service, especially for a fixed purity and a fixed pressure of the oxygen produced and whatever the output consumed, and therefore assumes that a second control be carried out downstream of the PSA or VSA unit, for example by means of a compressor.
An alternative solution involves decreasing the feed rate of the PSA or VSA unit, that is to say reducing the amount of material injected into the system during the adsorption phase of the sieve bed.
This may be achieved either by modifying the feed duration, as described by documents FR 97/16086 or U.S. Pat. No. 4,539,019, or by adjusting the aperture of an adsorber recompression valve, as recommended by document U.S. Pat. No. 5,258,056.
Although this solution is quite often preferable to the previous one in terms of energy consumption, given that it makes it possible, in certain cases, to maintain a constant specific energy up to 85% of the nominal output, as described by FR 97/16086, it does have in particular the disadvantage of leading to an obligatory reduction in the pressure of the production gas since the high pressure of the pressure cycle is necessarily lowered.
In addition, as in the case of the first control method, this second solution may not be sufficient to maintain a constant service. This is because
Rouge Dominique
Teuscher Nathalie
L'Air Liquide, Societe Anonyme pour l'Etude et l'
Spitzer Robert H.
Young & Thompson
LandOfFree
PSA or VSA unit having jointly-controlled production output... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with PSA or VSA unit having jointly-controlled production output..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and PSA or VSA unit having jointly-controlled production output... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2547878