Apparel – Guard or protector – For wearer's head
Reexamination Certificate
1998-07-30
2002-07-30
Nerbun, Peter (Department: 3741)
Apparel
Guard or protector
For wearer's head
Reexamination Certificate
active
06425141
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to helmet construction and, more particularly, to a new and improved protective helmet for use primarily by persons engaged in sporting or other activities exposed to the risk of head injury.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Helmets. Helmets used by bicyclists and others engaged in sports typically have a hard outer shell that covers energy-absorbing material. Bicycle helmets typically have a hard plastic outer shell that covers expanded polystyrene. Polystyrene absorbs energy by developing multiple micro-fractures throughout its structure. Once a polystyrene helmet develops micro-fractures it ceases to provide impact protection (i.e., such helmets are unusable after a single impact). Football helmets typically have a dense polyethylene outer shell that covers polypropylene pads capable of absorbing multiple impacts. Other helmets, such as those used by soldiers, typically have a metal or composite shell; that is able to protect a soldier's head from certain types of high-energy impacts.
Helmets typically have a retention system to secure the helmet in proper position on the user's head. The straps commonly used for bicycle helmets are difficult to adjust, resulting in many bicyclists wearing helmets improperly positioned and providing limited protection.
The helmet shape and the extent to which it covers the head are important design considerations. Helmets are shaped differently depending on the use to which the helmet is to be put and the energy level of the impacts the user might experience. Bicycle helmets are typically designed to protect the top, sides and front of the user's head.
Performance standards have been developed for certain types of helmets. For bicycle helmets, for example, the Snell B-95 Bicycle Helmet Standard involves a series of performance tests. A helmet passes the impact portion of the Snell test if it prevents a head from decelerating at a rate in excess of 300 G's when subjected to a specific test impact. The Snell 300 G's standard does not assure that a rider wearing a helmet meeting that standard will not suffer serious head injury. Head and brain injuries occur at deceleration levels well below 300 G's; also, riders can experience impacts that result in head deceleration levels above 300 G's.
Head Injury. The head can be thought of as having three components: the skull; the brain, which consists of compressible matter; and the fluid filling the skull and in which the brain floats. Neither the skull nor the fluid is compressible; the brain, however, is compressible and, when forced against the skull, does compress, bruising brain tissue and perhaps causing hemorrhaging. When the skull experiences an impact, the force is transmitted through the skull and fluid; the inertia of the fluid results in the brain moving in a direction opposite from that of the force applied to the skull. If that force is applied suddenly (i.e., there is an impact) and is substantial enough, the brain moves through the fluid and strikes the inside of the skull at a point roughly opposite to the area of the skull that sustains the impact.
When the brain strikes the skull with moderate force, the brain tissue in the area of the brain that hits the skull is compressed and bruised. That typically results in a temporary cessation of nervous function (i.e., a concussion).
When the skull is subjected to a more substantial impact, the brain typically hits the inside of the skull at a higher speed; a larger area of brain tissue is compressed and damaged and brain hemorrhaging is common (i.e., contusion results). If minimal hemorrhaging occurs, the individual may experience symptoms similar to those of a concussion. More substantial hemorrhaging may result in a loss of blood supply to the brain and even death.
When the energy level of the impact to the skull is substantial enough, the skull fractures. When it does, some of the impact energy is dissipated. A fracture may be either linear or localized. A linear fracture, the simpler of the two, is essentially a straight line crack. A localized fracture is one in which multiple fractures occur in a single area. In such a fracture, it is common for skull bone material to be displaced; the displacement can result in bone material penetrating brain tissue, causing hemorrhaging and swelling.
Research Considerations. We concluded it would be desirable to design a helmet that achieved the lowest possible rate of deceleration and thus maximum protection for the head. Published research suggests that the human skull can fracture at decelerations as low as 225 G's and that concussions can occur at substantially lower decelerations.
Published research showing that most helmet impacts experienced by bicyclists occurred at the right and left temporal areas of the head aided us in product design. Other research aided us in designing our tests and in identifying materials worthy of consideration.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
One object of the present invention is to provide a helmet having multiple foam layers for reducing the deceleration experienced by the head.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a new, improved protective helmet that will, under the testing criteria employed, prevent a head from decelerating at a rate in excess of 100 G's.
Yet another object is to provide a helmet arrangement that can withstand multiple impacts and still be reusable.
Still a further object is to provide a new, improved protective helmet that can be easily and efficiently manufactured and marketed.
Another object is to provide a new, improved protective helmet of a durable and reliable construction.
Yet another object is to provide a protective helmet that can be manufactured at an economically acceptable cost to the buying public.
The present invention can be characterized in a variety of ways. In one characterization, the helmet is comprised of a relatively stiff outer shell and a plurality of impact-energy-absorbing material layers disposed within the outer shell in juxtaposition to each other. At least one of these impact-energy-absorbing material layers is made of an open-celled polyurethane foam.
The invention may also be characterized as a helmet comprising a relatively stiff outer shell and a plurality of impact-energy-absorbing material layers disposed within the outer shell in juxtaposed position to each other. The impact-energy-absorbing material layers, in combination with the relatively stiff outer shell, are selected so that the helmet will prevent a head from decelerating at a rate in excess of 100 G's under the testing criteria employed.
It is further theorized that the invention can be characterized as a helmet comprising a relatively stiff outer shell and a plurality of impact-energy-absorbing material layers disposed within the outer shell in juxtaposed position to each other. In accordance with this characterization of the invention, the material layers are selected such that they are capable of restoring to their original shape following impact and/or repeated impacts.
In a preferred embodiment, the present invention is directed to a helmet comprised of an outer shell, energy-absorbing layers, and a retention system for securing the helmet to the user's head. Importantly, the energy-absorbing layers comprise at least a first layer of impact-energy-absorbing material adjacent to the outer shell, a second layer of impact-energy-absorbing material adjacent to the first layer, and a third layer of impact-energy-absorbing material adjacent to the second layer and to the wearer's head.
Although the preferred embodiment is comprised of three layers of open-celled foam, it is theorized that the three layers may be replaced with four, five or more layers preferably each having lesser thickness than each layer in the three-layer embodiment to avoid construction of an unnecessarily large helmet. If four or more layers are utilized, the composite thickness preferably is the same as the thickness achieved in the three-layer
Conn Andrew F.
Ewing James Scott
Maroulis Maria
Cerebrix
Michael & Best & Friedrich LLP
Nerbun Peter
Peterson Jeffrey D.
Welch Teresa J.
LandOfFree
Protective helmet does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Protective helmet, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Protective helmet will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2829562