Boots – shoes – and leggings – Soles – Cushion
Reexamination Certificate
2001-09-17
2003-12-23
Patterson, M. D. (Department: 3728)
Boots, shoes, and leggings
Soles
Cushion
C036S031000, C036S03500R, C036S03500R
Reexamination Certificate
active
06665958
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates in general to footwear and the bladders used in footwear. More particularly, the present invention relates to a protective cage for the bladder that reduces bladder failure.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Footwear is divided generally into two parts, an upper and a sole. The upper is the portion of the footwear designed to comfortably enclose the foot, while the sole is the portion of the footwear designed to provide traction, protection, cushioning, and a durable wear surface. Typically, the sole includes several layers, including a resilient, shock absorbent material as a midsole and a ground engaging durable material as an outsole.
Known midsoles are typically made of conventional foam materials, such as ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) or polyurethane. These materials compress resiliently under an applied load, such as forces generated by athletes, to provide cushioning to the athlete's feet and legs. Conventional foam materials are resiliently compressible, in part, due to the inclusion of foam having open and closed cells defining an inner volume that is substantially displaced by gas. In other words, the foam includes bubbles within the material which give the foam its compressible and resilient features. Conventional foam materials, however, have certain drawbacks. Most notably, the foam materials deteriorate by compaction after repeated compression caused by extended use of the footwear. The deterioration is the result of the collapse of the cell structure within the foam, resulting in decreased compressibility of the foam and thus decreased cushioning of the midsole. A mostly successful solution to the problems associated with conventional foam materials has been the use and placement of gas-filled cushioning devices or bladders within the midsole. The bladders are inflatable inserts made of elastomeric materials that are resiliently compressible to provide cushioning to the wearer of the footwear.
There are several known bladders of varying construction, which have been used in the footwear industry. For instance, U.S. Pat. No. 6,119,371 to Goodwin, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference, discloses a bladder formed of an outer enclosing member and an inner member. The outer enclosing member is formed of a thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) film consisting of two layers of material. The TPU film forms the shell shape of the bladder and defines a sealed chamber. The inner member is located within the sealed chamber and is formed of spaced apart fabric layers connected together by a plurality of connecting yarns or drop threads. The sealed chamber contains a pressurized fluid to place the plurality of connecting yarns under tension. The resulting structure provides enhanced cushioning to the wearer of the footwear. Other types of bladders are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,713,141 and 5,952,065 to Mitchell et al., 5,353,459 to Potter et al., and 4,506,460 and 4,219,945 to Rudy, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference. These bladders are known generally as permanently filled bladders and may be manufactured by various techniques. For example, some bladders are manufactured by the prior art two-film technique in which two sheets of elastomeric film are welded together along their periphery to define an enclosed chamber. Other bladders are manufactured by the prior art blow molding technique in which a liquefied elastomeric material is placed in a mold having the desired shape of the bladder. Pressurized air is then injected into the mold to force the elastomeric material against the inner surfaces of the mold and cause the material to harden to the desired bladder shape. With either technique, the formed bladder is pressurized with a gas or liquid and sealed to create an inflated resilient bladder that provides added footwear cushioning. It will be recognized that some of these known bladders are made of multiple chambers in fluid communication with each other. Those of skill in the art will recognize that other footwear bladders exist, the details and construction of which, however, need not be discussed except to note that these bladders may be used with the present invention.
A drawback with respect to existing bladders is over flexing of the TPU film of the outer chamber. The over flexing is a result of abnormal wear of the shoe caused by abnormal loading placed on the bladder from athletes who, for example, have a tendency to pronate or supinate while running. Over time, this over flexing leads to film cracking and fatigue and ultimately bladder failure due to subsequent pressure loss in the chamber. The failures of the bladder are most prevalent in the vertical side walls of the bladder, particularly in exposed bladders—bladders not enveloped in a foam material, but visible to the outside.
In an effort to overcome the failure of existing bladders, conventional foam materials were placed around the bladder. While this effort has been somewhat successful, problems still exist with respect to the use of foam materials. As stated above, the cell structure of the foam material has a tendency to break down and deteriorate over time and use. Upon the break-down of the foam material, the bladders lose their structural support provided by the foam material and experience over flexing of the TPU film. Moreover, with the use of a foam material enclosing the bladder, the material will mask the pure cushioning response of the bladder, thus changing the perception of the footwear.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art by providing a bladder support system that improves bladder durability by preventing the bladder from experiencing over flexing of the bladder film. In an exemplary embodiment, the present invention includes the use of a protective cage, which encases the bladder and provides structural support to the side walls of the bladder—the location where bladder stresses are the greatest. The support provided by this protective cage has been shown to significantly reduce if not eliminate bladder failure due to film flex fatigue. The protective cage has also been shown to protect the bladder from abrasions, which also leads to bladder film breakdown.
The protective cage of the invention generally includes a cage base or moderator surface and a plurality of spaced apart bladder support members extending outwardly from the cage base at its periphery. The bladder is positioned within the protective cage, against the cage base, and between the plurality of support members. The support members, which extend along the bladder side walls, control the amount of perimeter bladder deflection. Control of the perimeter bladder deflection, in turn, controls the stress placed on the film of the bladder under loaded conditions. Significantly, the use of the cage of the present invention results in a longer life for the bladder. In addition, the present invention still permits complete bladder deflection at the center of the bladder—the location on the bladder responsible for most of the footwear cushioning.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4219945 (1980-09-01), Rudy
patent: 4506460 (1985-03-01), Rudy
patent: 4610099 (1986-09-01), Signori
patent: 4906502 (1990-03-01), Rudy
patent: 5083361 (1992-01-01), Rudy
patent: 5220737 (1993-06-01), Edington
patent: 4219945 (1993-10-01), Rudy
patent: 5279051 (1994-01-01), Whatley
patent: 5353459 (1994-10-01), Potter et al.
patent: 5363570 (1994-11-01), Allen et al.
patent: 5543194 (1996-08-01), Rudy
patent: 5713140 (1998-02-01), Baggenstoss
patent: 5713141 (1998-02-01), Mitchell et al.
patent: 5729917 (1998-03-01), Slepian et al.
patent: 5778563 (1998-07-01), Ahlbaumer
patent: 5933983 (1999-08-01), Jeon
patent: 5937545 (1999-08-01), Dyer et al.
patent: 5952065 (1999-09-01), Mitchell et al.
patent: 6115943 (2000-09-01), Gyr
patent: 6119371 (2000-09-01), Goodwin et al.
patent: 2002/0050077 (2002-05-01), Wang et al.
Robert C. Juvinall, Professor of Engineering University of Michigan and Kurt M. Marshek, Professor of Mechanical Engi
Banner & Witcoff , Ltd.
Nike Inc.
Patterson M. D.
LandOfFree
Protective cage for footwear bladder does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Protective cage for footwear bladder, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Protective cage for footwear bladder will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3134227