Television – Video display – Projection device
Patent
1992-11-12
1995-01-31
Kostak, Victor R.
Television
Video display
Projection device
348753, 348755, 348758, 348764, H04N 934, H04N 574, H04N 964, H04N 973
Patent
active
053862538
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to projection video display systems and more particularly to systems of the kind in which beams of light projected by a projector onto a screen are modulated by a spatial light modulator or light valve device responsive to a video signal.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Spatial light modulator display devices include so-called "active matrix" devices, comprising an array of light modulating elements, or "light valves", each of which is controllable by a control signal (usually an electrical signal) to controllably reflect or transmit light in accordance with the control signal. A liquid crystal array is one example of an active matrix device; another example is the deformable mirror device (DMD) array developed by Texas Instruments and described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,615,595 or in "128.times.128 deformable mirror device" IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED-30, 539 (1983), L J Hornbeck. One type of colour video projection display system using a DMD array is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,680,579.
Generally speaking, a DMD array comprises a plurality of separately addressed electrically deflectable mirrors; if a light beam is directed on the array device, the light reflected in a given direction by the array will depend upon the angle of inclination of each mirror, so that a video image may be superimposed on a reflected beam of light by controlling the mirrors of the array in accordance with the pixel values of a frame of a video signal. To produce a grey scale of intensity, it is possible to control the angle of each mirror through a continuous range using an analog control signal but a greatly preferred alternative method, which gives better contrast, involves controlling the mirror deflection between two positions corresponding to substantially reflective and unreflective states, and controlling the length of time in which the mirror is in the reflective state. Although a pulse width modulation technique could be used, as described in "Deformable Mirror Device Spatial Light Modulators and Their Applicability to Optical Neural Networks", Collins et all, Applied Optics Vol. 28, No. 22, November 1989, page 4904, a preferred technique is disclosed in our United Kingdom Patent Application No. 9100188.3 filed on 4 January 1991 (agents ref. 3203201) incorporated herein by reference.
To produce a colour display, three separately illuminated active matrix devices may be provided, each controlled by a respective colour signal and illuminated by a respective colour light beam, the modulated colour light beams being recombined for display, for example as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,680,579 or in our UK patent applications 9101715.2 and 9101714.5 filed on 25 January 1991 (agents ref. 3203301 and 3203401), incorporated herein by reference.
One example of a spatial modulator device which is not an active matrix device is the "eidophor" system, in which an oil film is illuminated by a light beam and, simultaneously, scanned by an electron beam controlled by a video signal, which acts to control the reflective state of the oil film.
With projection systems in general, the overall light level in the projected image, as perceived by an observer in the viewing space (for example an auditorium) varies over the screen area. Relatively large scale intensity variations are caused by, for example, the reduction of light intensity towards the edge of the screen due to the physical geometry of the projection system (specifically the projection lens), which is known as "vignetting", and the variation of light intensity due to the variations of angles of incidence over the screen area. U.S. Pat. No. 4,210,928 shows a prior display system, using cathode ray tubes rather than light modulators to correct this type of intensity variation by providing a light blocking plate within the optical path of the projected light beam prior to the screen. However, even with cathode ray tubes this solution is crude, and of limited usefulness since it involves forming and/or mechanically ali
REFERENCES:
patent: 4210928 (1980-07-01), Ohmori et al.
patent: 4368963 (1993-01-01), Stolov
patent: 4680579 (1987-01-01), Ott
patent: 4868668 (1989-09-01), Tauernetti
patent: 5097324 (1992-03-01), Tanaka et al.
patent: 5150205 (1992-09-01), Um et al.
Glenn, William E., "Solid-State-Driven Deformable Television Light Modulator," SID International Symposium, SID 87 Digest, May 1987, pp. 72-73.
Burgess Glenton B.
Kostak Victor R.
Rank Brimar Limited
LandOfFree
Projection video display systems does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Projection video display systems, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Projection video display systems will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-1105055