Optics: image projectors – Reflector – Plural
Reexamination Certificate
2000-12-07
2003-02-25
Dowling, William (Department: 2851)
Optics: image projectors
Reflector
Plural
C359S212100, C359S292000, C348S771000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06523961
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
1. Field of Invention
The present invention relates to movable micromirrors and micromirror arrays for direct-view and projection displays. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,835,256 and 6,046,840 to Huibers, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/617,419 to Huibers et al., the subject matter of each being incorporated herein by reference, disclose micro-electromechanical devices (MEMS) for steering light beams, such as in an optical switch, and/or for forming a display (e.g. a projection display). A common feature is a mirror element which is movable so as to deflect light through different angles, depending upon the mirror element's tilt angle. In one type of conventional direct view or projection display system, an array of reflective mirror elements are provided for producing an image. Typically the mirror elements are square.
2. Related Art
One type of micromirror array is disclosed in Kim et al. “Thin-film Micromirror Array (TMA) for High Luminance and Cost-competitive Information Display Systems”, SPIE Photonics West, EI99 where an array of mirrors are microfabricated on a MOS addressing circuitry substrate. Each (square) mirror is addressed by the active matrix transistor array. Each mirror is held by a center post above a top electrode and a bottom electrode, which are in turn disposed above a supporting layer and the active matrix.
In Hornbeck's “Digital Light Processing for High-Brightness, High-Resolution Applications”, a similar arrangement is disclosed. A (square) mirror is held on a post above a yoke and hinge and a mirror address electrode, which are in turn disposed above a yoke address electrode and a CMOS substrate.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,038,056, the mirror elements are again square and the center post, also square, is disposed so that corresponding sides of each post and the mirror are parallel. The light source is placed at a 45 degree angle to the mirror array. One problem with such an arrangement, is that the light source must be placed at an angle from the mirror array (in the X, Y and Z axes) which increases the cost of the illumination optics and the overall size of the projection system.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In order to minimize light diffraction along the direction of switching and more particularly light diffraction into the acceptance cone of the projection optics, in the present invention, mirrors are provided which are not rectangular (“rectangular” as used herein including square mirrors). Diffraction as referred to herein, denotes the scattering of light off of a periodic structure, where the light is not necessarily monochromatic or phase coherent Also, in order to minimize the cost of the illumination optics and the size of the display unit of the present invention, the light source is placed orthogonal to the rows (or columns) of the array, and/or the light source is placed orthogonal to a side of the frame defining the active area of the array. The incident light beam, though orthogonal to the rows (or columns) and/or side of the active area, should not, however, be orthogonal to sides of the individual mirrors in the array. Orthogonal sides cause incident light to diffract along the direction of mirror switching, and result in light ‘leakage’ into the on-state even if the mirror is in the off-state. This light diffraction decreases the contrast ratio of the mirror.
The present invention optimizes the contrast ratio of the mirror array so that when mirrors are in their off-state they send minimal light to the spatial region where light is directed when mirrors are in their on-state. More specifically, the present invention comprises a particularly located light source and incident light beam and particularly designed mirrors in the array, which minimizes light diffracted into the acceptance cone of the projection (or viewing) optics, so as to provide an improved contrast ratio. The arrangement/design of the present invention also minimizes non-reflective areas in the array, by allowing for a tight fit of mirrors and a large fill factor with low diffraction from the off to the on-state, even when the array is illuminated along the axes of mirror periodicity. Namely, the design optimizes contrast ratio through angular sides non-parallel to the mirror's axis of rotation and optimizes fill factor through hinges that require a relatively small amount of area and allow neighboring mirrors to tile together with little wasted non-reflective area.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3886310 (1975-05-01), Guldberg et al.
patent: 3896338 (1975-07-01), Nathanson et al.
patent: 4492435 (1985-01-01), Banton et al.
patent: 4566935 (1986-01-01), Hornbeck
patent: 4592628 (1986-06-01), Altman et al.
patent: 4596992 (1986-06-01), Hornbeck
patent: 4615595 (1986-10-01), Hornbeck
patent: 4662746 (1987-05-01), Hornbeck
patent: 4710732 (1987-12-01), Hornbeck
patent: 4956619 (1990-09-01), Hornbeck
patent: 5028939 (1991-07-01), Hornbeck et al.
patent: 5552924 (1996-09-01), Tregilgas
patent: 5629794 (1997-05-01), Magel et al.
patent: 5659374 (1997-08-01), Gale, Jr. et al.
patent: 5696619 (1997-12-01), Knipe et al.
patent: 5719695 (1998-02-01), Heimbuch
patent: 5757539 (1998-05-01), Min
patent: 5835256 (1998-11-01), Huibers
patent: 5914803 (1999-06-01), Hwang et al.
patent: 5943157 (1999-08-01), Florence et al.
patent: 5949568 (1999-09-01), Koo et al.
patent: 5999306 (1999-12-01), Atobe et al.
patent: 6038056 (2000-03-01), Florence et al.
patent: 6046840 (2000-04-01), Huibers
patent: 6123985 (2000-09-01), Robinson et al.
patent: 6128121 (2000-10-01), Choi et al.
patent: 6175443 (2001-01-01), Aksyuk et al.
patent: 6222667 (2001-04-01), Gobeli
patent: 6288828 (2001-09-01), Hewlett
patent: 6351330 (2002-02-01), Ko et al.
patent: 6359669 (2002-03-01), Dehmlow
patent: 2002/0005979 (2002-01-01), Bartlett et al.
patent: 0877272 (1998-11-01), None
patent: 1019950050270 (1995-12-01), None
Hornbeck, “Digital Light Processing (TM) for High-Brightnes, High-Resolution Applications”, SPIE Photonics West, EI97, Feb. 1997.
Kim et al., “Thin-film Micromirror Array (TMA) for High Luminance and Cost-Competitive Information Display Systems”, SID Digest, 1999, pp. 982-985.
Kim et al., “Thin-film Micromirror Array (TMA) for Information Display Systems”, Euro Display '99, Berlin.
Gregory et al, “Optical characteristics of a deformable-mirror spatial light modulator”, Optics Letters, vol. 13, No. 1, Jan. 1988.
Hornbeck, “From cathode rays to digital micromirrors: A history of electronic projection display technology”, TI Technical Journal, Jul.-Sep. 1998, pp. 7-46.
Thomas et al., “The Mirror Matrix Tube: A Novel Light Valve for Projection Displays”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. Ed-22 No. 9, Sep. 1975, pp. 765-775.
Brooks, “Micromechanical light modulators for data transfer and processing”, SPIE vol. 465, 1984, pp. 46-54.
Hornbeck, “Deformable-Mirror Spatial Light Modulator”, SPIE vol. 1150, 1989, pp. 86-102.
Hornbeck, “Digital Light Processing and MEMS: Reflecting the Digital Display Needs of the Networked Society”, SPIE vol. 2783, 1996, pp. 2-13.
Sampsell, “Digital micromirror device and its application to projection dispalays”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12(6), Nov./Dec. 1994, pp. 3242-3246.
Mignardi, “Digital micromirror array for projection TV”, Solid State Technology, Jul., 1994. pp. 63-68.
Younse et al, “The Digital Micromirror Device (DMD) and Its Transition to HDTV”, Proc. of the 13th International Display Research Conf., 1993, pp. 613-616.
Sampsell, “An Overview of the Digital Micromirror Device (DMD) and Its Application to Projection Systems”, SID Digest, 1993, pp. 1012-1015.
Hornbeck, “Digital Micromirror Device—Commercialization of a Massively Parallel MEMS Technology”, Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS)—ASME DSC v 62, Nov. 1997, 3-8.
Ilkov Fedor A.
Patel Satyadev R.
Richards Peter W.
Stockton John K.
Dowling William
Muir Gregory R.
Reflectivity, Inc.
LandOfFree
Projection system and mirror elements for improved contrast... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Projection system and mirror elements for improved contrast..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Projection system and mirror elements for improved contrast... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3135711