Projection display system with pressure sensing at a screen,...

Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system – Display peripheral interface input device – Touch panel

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C345S178000, C178S018030

Reexamination Certificate

active

07626577

ABSTRACT:
Calibration structure, method, and code for correcting non-orthogonal misalignment of a computer-generated image that is projected onto a large screen touch-detecting display, so that a computer-generated image appears substantially where the display is touched. Structure/method/code generates at least four calibration marks, respectively, substantially proximate four corners of a projected image to be displayed on the display. Structure/method/code, responsive to a touch on the large screen touch-detecting display where each of the four calibration marks is displayed, identifies horizontal and vertical coordinates of each touched location. Structure/method/code calibrates the projected image to the display after the four calibration marks have been touched. Structure/method/code, responsive to another touch on the display after calibration, displays a computer image substantially at the location of the another touch.

REFERENCES:
patent: 3705956 (1972-12-01), Dertouzos
patent: 3761877 (1973-09-01), Fernald
patent: 3916099 (1975-10-01), Hlady
patent: 4125743 (1978-11-01), O'Boyle et al.
patent: 4280135 (1981-07-01), Schlossberg
patent: 4317956 (1982-03-01), Torok et al.
patent: 4436393 (1984-03-01), Vanderwerf
patent: 4442317 (1984-04-01), Jandrell
patent: 4442319 (1984-04-01), Treidl
patent: 4476463 (1984-10-01), Ng et al.
patent: 4516156 (1985-05-01), Fabris et al.
patent: 4622437 (1986-11-01), Bloom et al.
patent: 4623757 (1986-11-01), Marino
patent: 4672558 (1987-06-01), Beckes et al.
patent: 4684996 (1987-08-01), Baumeister
patent: 4710758 (1987-12-01), Mussler et al.
patent: 4724480 (1988-02-01), Hecker et al.
patent: 4754334 (1988-06-01), Kriz et al.
patent: 4757239 (1988-07-01), Starkey, IV
patent: 4805205 (1989-02-01), Faye
patent: 4846694 (1989-07-01), Erhardt
patent: 4853498 (1989-08-01), Meadows et al.
patent: 4857998 (1989-08-01), Tsujihara et al.
patent: 4903012 (1990-02-01), Ohuchi
patent: 4929935 (1990-05-01), Rysavy et al.
patent: 4938570 (1990-07-01), Majima et al.
patent: 4953971 (1990-09-01), Highfill
patent: 5010323 (1991-04-01), Hoffman
patent: 5023408 (1991-06-01), Murakami et al.
patent: 5025314 (1991-06-01), Tang et al.
patent: 5091773 (1992-02-01), Fouche et al.
patent: 5115107 (1992-05-01), Crooks et al.
patent: 5115230 (1992-05-01), Smoot
patent: 5134388 (1992-07-01), Murakami et al.
patent: 5138304 (1992-08-01), Bronson
patent: 5181015 (1993-01-01), Marshall et al.
patent: 5189732 (1993-02-01), Kondo
patent: 5235263 (1993-08-01), Boston et al.
patent: 5235363 (1993-08-01), Vogeley et al.
patent: 5239373 (1993-08-01), Tang et al.
patent: 5276436 (1994-01-01), Shaw et al.
patent: 5341155 (1994-08-01), Elrod et al.
patent: 5448263 (1995-09-01), Martin
patent: 5471226 (1995-11-01), Suzuki et al.
patent: 5489923 (1996-02-01), Marshall et al.
patent: 5515079 (1996-05-01), Hauck
patent: 5528263 (1996-06-01), Platzker et al.
patent: 5933132 (1999-08-01), Marshall et al.
patent: 59-134853 (1984-09-01), None
patent: 59-231634 (1984-12-01), None
patent: 61-026127 (1986-02-01), None
patent: 61-290523 (1986-12-01), None
patent: 62-102233 (1987-05-01), None
patent: 64-068059 (1989-03-01), None
patent: 02-003085 (1990-01-01), None
patent: 2-8925 (1990-01-01), None
patent: 2-81219 (1990-03-01), None
patent: 02-186869 (1990-07-01), None
patent: 03-15935 (1991-01-01), None
patent: 3-167621 (1991-07-01), None
patent: 6-35608 (1994-10-01), None
Feb. 23, 2007, Letter from George Pazuniak of Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice to Richard P. Bauer of Katten Muchin Rosenman, LLP regarding Smart U.S. Appl. No. 10/832,281.
Defendant's Second Supplemental Responses to Smart's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-14) Served in Case No. 1:04-CV-713, Case No. 1:03-cv-476 consolidated with Case No. 1:04-cv-713 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Feb. 28, 2006.
Polyvision's Response to Smart's Substituted First Set of Interrogatories to Polyvision and Paragram (Nos. 1-14) Served in Case No. 1:04-CV-713, Case No. 1:03-cv-476 consolidated with Case No. 1:04-cv-713 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Mar. 17, 2005.
Polyvision Corporation's Amended Responses to Smart's Interrogatories in Case No. 1:04-CV-713, Case No. 1:03-cv-476 consolidated with Case No. 1:04-cv-713 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Sep. 30, 2005.
Polyvision's Response to Smart's Second Set of Interrogatories to Polyvision and Paragram (Nos. 14-18) in Case No. 1:04-CV-713,Case No. 1:03-cv-476 consolidated with Case No. 1:04-cv-713 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Sep. 15, 2005.
Polyvision's Response to Smart's Third Set of Interrogatories to Polyvision and Paragram (No. 19) in Case No. 1:04-CV-713, Case No. 1:03-cv-476 consolidated with Case No. 1:04-cv-713 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Sep. 30, 2005.
Amended and Supplemented Comprehensive Chart Pursuant to ¶5(C) of the Case Management Order With Regard to the Claims Asserted in Case No. 1:04-CV-713, Case No. 1:03-cv-476 consolidated with Case No. 1:04-cv-713 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Jul. 22, 2005.
Polyvision's Claim Construction Brief on Smart's Patents, Case No. 1:03-cv-476 consolidated with Case No. 1:04-cv-713 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, May 19, 2005.
Plaintiff Smart's Portion of the Comprehensive Chart Pursuant to Paragraph 5(C) of the Case Management Order, Case No. 1:03-cv-476 consolidated with Case No. 1:04-cv-713 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Apr. 7, 2005.
Submission by Polyvision and Paragram of Statement of Claim Construction Issues, Case No. 1:03-cv-476 consolidated with Case No. 1:04-cv-713 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Apr. 7, 2005.
Polyvision's First Motion for Partial Summary Judgment—Non-Infringement and/or Invalidity of Claims 8 and 14-19 of U.S. Patent 6,747,636, Case No. 1:03-cv-476 consolidated with Case No. 1:04-cv-713 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Dec. 22, 2005.
Polyvision's Opening Brief in Support of its First Motion for Partial Summary Judgment—Non-Infringement or Invalidity of Claims 8 and 14-19 of U.S. Patent 6,747,636 and Exhibits A-I, Case No. 1:03-cv-476 consolidated with Case No. 1:04-cv-713 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Dec. 22, 2005.
Polyvision's Position Paper and Ehhibits H, I, and J, Case No. 1:03-cv-476 consolidated with Case No. 1:04-cv-713 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Apr. 29, 2004.
Smart's Response to Polyvisions's Second Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 14-23), Case No. 1:03-cv-476 consolidated with Case No. 1:04-cv-713 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Mar. 16, 2005.
Polyvision's Reply Brief in Support of its Fourth Motion for Summary Judgment—That Claims 6, 10, and 20 of the '309 Patent Are Not Anticipated, Case No. 1:03-cv-476 consolidated with Case No. 1:04-cv-713 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Feb. 2, 2006.
Polyvision's Reply Brief in Support of its Second Motion for Partial Summary Judgment—Dismissing Smarts Best Mode and Enablemnt Defenses to Claims 6, 10, and 20 of Polyvision's U.S. Patent 5,838,309, Case No. 1:03-cv-476 consolidated with Case No. 1:04-cv-713 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Feb. 2, 2006.
Polyvision's Reply Brief in Support of its Third Motion for Partial Summary Judgment—Infringement of United States Patent 5,838,309, Case No. 1:03-cv-476 consolidated with Case No. 1:04-cv-713 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Feb. 2, 2006.
Plaintiff Smart Technologies Inc.'s Statement of Claim Construction Issues, Case No. 1:03-cv-476 consolidated with Case No. 1:04-cv-713 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Apr. 7, 2005.
Smart's Brief on Claim Construction and Exhibits A-F, Case No. 1:03-cv-476 consolidated with Case No. 1:04-cv-713 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michi

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Projection display system with pressure sensing at a screen,... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Projection display system with pressure sensing at a screen,..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Projection display system with pressure sensing at a screen,... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4092662

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.