Multiplex communications – Fault recovery – Bypass an inoperative channel
Reexamination Certificate
2000-04-19
2002-12-17
Chin, Wellington (Department: 2664)
Multiplex communications
Fault recovery
Bypass an inoperative channel
C370S351000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06496477
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to the electronics field of remote access and networking. The invention is implemented in numerous different embodiments in integrated circuits, chipsets, printed circuit cards, computers, networks, servers, routers, telephone handsets, base stations, gateways, and PBXs, as well as methods and processes of manufacture and operation of each of the foregoing, and improved packets and packet ensembles.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Communication through the Internet is based on the Internet Protocol (IP). The Internet is a packet-switched network versus the more traditional circuit switched voice network. The routing decision regarding an IP packet's next hop is made on a hop-by-hop basis. The full path followed by a packet is usually unknown to the transmitter, but it can be determined after the fact.
Packet loss over the Internet has been shown to be highly correlated. If packet N is dropped, there is a high probability that packet N+1 will also be dropped. Kostas, Borella, et al. “Real-Time voice over Packet-Switched Networks,” IEEE Network, January/February 1998.
Voice over Packet/Voice over IP (VOP/VOIP) solutions contend with bandwidth, delay jitter, delay, and packet loss issues. Voice codecs provide some form of packet loss-concealment, or packet loss mitigation, by utilizing coding and packetization schemes over a single flow. These schemes employ some combination of buffering and redundancy (forward error correction (FEC), multi-rate encoding, etc.). The redundant portion of the coding is inserted into some other packet in the single flow. Such coding provides an intra/inter packet diversity gain that can help conceal packet loss, delay, and delay jitter.
TCP is a transport layer 4 protocol and IP is a network layer 3 protocol. IP is unreliable in the sense that it does not guarantee that a sent packet will reach its destination. TCP is provided on top of IP to guarantee packet delivery by tagging each packet. Lost or out of order packets are detected and then the source supplies a responsive retransmission of the packet to destination. Because the packet retransmission process takes significant time, TCP may not satisfactorily solve problems in quality transmission of audio, also known as Voice over IP or VOP (Voice over Packet), and video and other media where maximum tolerable packet delay is not high.
UDP is a transport layer 4 protocol that eliminates the overhead of the retransmission mechanism of TCP but does not make a guarantee that every sent packet will be received. The interface to command the use of either UDP or TCP is very similar.
DIFFSERV is a class of service initiative spearheaded by the IETF Internet Engineering Task Force. Class A service will be better than Class B and Class B is better than Class C. IETF has tried to improve QoS (quality of service). QoS categories are mapped by a policy mechanism to the DIFFSERV class of service categories. However, the policies of different subnetworks (domains) of different companies do vary. As a packet traverses the Internet it typically crosses various companies' domains. These companies require and need to track payment for various classes of services, so permission and authentication mechanisms are keyed to the various service policies of the companies.
RSVP is an edge-network protocol which requires that every intermediate router understand RSVP. Over long distances typical of the Internet this condition does not usually pertain. RSVP is utilized in enterprise networks.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In one form of the invention, a process of sending real-time information from a sender computer to a receiver computer coupled to the sender computer by a packet network wherein packets sometimes become lost, includes steps of directing packets containing the real-time information from the sender computer by at least one path in the packet network to the receiver computer, and directing packets containing information dependent on the real-time information from the sender computer by at least one path-diversity path in the packet network to the same receiver computer.
Other forms of the invention encompass other processes, improved packets and packet ensembles, integrated circuits, chipsets, computer add-in cards, information storage articles, systems, computers, gateways, routers, cellular telephone handsets, wireless base stations, appliances, and packet networks, and other forms as claimed.
REFERENCES:
patent: 6061728 (2000-05-01), Mead et al.
patent: 6092178 (2000-07-01), Jindal et al.
patent: 6175869 (2001-01-01), Ahuja et al.
patent: 6260070 (2001-07-01), Shah
patent: 6263371 (2001-07-01), Geagan, III et al.
patent: 6295276 (2001-09-01), Datta et al.
patent: 6298120 (2001-10-01), Civanlar et al.
patent: 6314105 (2001-11-01), Luong
patent: 6327622 (2001-12-01), Jindal et al.
patent: 6389005 (2002-05-01), Cruickshank
patent: 6400707 (2002-06-01), Baum et al.
patent: 6404870 (2002-06-01), Kia et al.
Voice/Fax Over IP: Internet, Intranet, and Extranet.
Johnny Chen et al., “A Simple, Practical Distributed Multi-Path Routing Algorithm,” pp. 1-28, Jul. 16, 1998.
Johnny Chen et al., “An Efficient Multipath Forwarding Method,” IEEE Infocom '98: The Conference on Computer Communications, vol. 3, pp. 1418-1425, Mar. 29-Apr. 2, 1998.
Johnny Chen et al., “A New Approach to Routing with Dynamic Metrics,” IEEE Infocom '99: The Conference on Computer Communications, vol. 2, pp. 661-670, Mar. 21-25, 1999.
Thomas J. Kostas et al., “Real-Time Voice Over Packet-Switched Networks,” IEEE Network, pp. 18-27, Jan./Feb. 1998.
Ajay Ingle et al., “DPCM System Design for Diversity Systems with Applications to Packetized Speech,” IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 48-58, Jan. 1995.
Anandakumar Krishanasamy
Gatherer Alan
McCree Alan V.
Perkins Stephen J.
Viswanathan Vishu
Brady W. James
Chin Wellington
Hoel Carlton H.
Pham Brenda
Telecky , Jr. Frederick J.
LandOfFree
Processes, articles, and packets for network path diversity... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Processes, articles, and packets for network path diversity..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Processes, articles, and packets for network path diversity... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2938953