Liquid purification or separation – Processes – Treatment by living organism
Reissue Patent
1998-11-24
2001-05-22
Upton, Christopher (Department: 1724)
Liquid purification or separation
Processes
Treatment by living organism
C210S631000, C210S916000, C435S264000, C435S266000
Reissue Patent
active
RE037181
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a process for the removal or reduction of dissolved hydrogen sulfide, and reduction of BOD in sewer systems, municipal waste treatment plants and in other industrial waste applications.
It is known to add nitrates or nitrites to sewage to effect reduction in BOD and even to suppress the formation of hydrogen sulfide gas via bacterial action. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,300,404; 4,446,031; and 4,681,687.
It is also known to add nitrates to sewage in order to control objectionable odors. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,966,450; 4,108,771.
There have also been attempts to remove hydrogen sulfide directly from waste. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,680,127, the patentee adds amounts of glyoxal, or glyoxal in combination with formaldehyde or glutaraldehyde, in order to reduce or scavenge the amount of hydrogen sulfide in aqueous or wet gaseous mediums.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,501,668, the patentee utilizes polycondensation products produced by the condensation of acrolein and formaldehyde to eliminate hydrogen sulfide present in aqueous systems, such as waste water clarification plants. Merk also mentions benefits relating to corrosion prevention and deodorization.
In U.S. Pat. No. 3,959,130, the patentee decontaminates sewage systems, waste water treatment plants and other industrial waste applications containing hydrogen sulfide by adjusting the pH of the sewage of a value over 7.0 and bringing the sewage into contact with an ash product.
It has now been discovered that the addition of nitrate, via an aqueous sodium nitrate solution, to sewage systems, waste treatment plants and other industrial waste applications containing dissolved hydrogen sulfide will result in the elimination or substantial reduction of the hydrogen sulfide, as well as the elimination of other “minor” odors associated with other sulphur-containing compounds.
It is believed that the addition of nitrate provides an oxygen source which promotes the growth of naturally occurring bacteria which utilize in their metabolism the sulfur tied up as hydrogen sulfide. It has been demonstrated both in lab jar tests and in an actual sewage collection system test, that dosing sewage containing over 50 mg/L of dissolved hydrogen sulfide with a sodium nitrate solution reduces the dissolved hydrogen sulfide to less than 0.1 mg/L. Along with this phenomena a significant reduction in sewage biological oxygen demand, BOD, of up to about 70%, and overall “sweetening”, i.e., removal of other minor odors, of the sewage has been observed. These phenomena are believed to be the results of the biological process promoted by the nitrate addition.
More specifically, it has been found that 2.4 parts of nitrate oxygen (NO
3
—O) are necessary to remove 1 part dissolved sulfide (S
2−
). The source of nitrate to accomplish removal of the hydrogen sulfide is not specific, and aqueous solutions of both sodium nitrate and calcium nitrate appear to be suitable.
Because the necessary reaction is biochemical, it will not occur within a sterile solution, i.e., naturally occurring bacteria must be present. Moreover, the removal of hydrogen sulfide is not instantaneous. According to applicant's tests, an “incubation” period of about 8 to about 96 hours, and preferably about 24 to about 48 hours, is necessary to culture the bacteria, followed by about 1.5 to about 20 hours, and preferably about 3 to about 12 hours, for ongoing sulfide removal.
It has further been determined that the process in accordance with this invention achieves a significant reduction in sewage BOD due to the utilization of organic matter in the metabolism described.
Other objects and advantages will become apparent from the detailed description which follows.
REFERENCES:
patent: 221232 (1879-11-01), Hirsh
patent: 1701825 (1929-02-01), Seil
patent: 1997252 (1935-04-01), Fischer
patent: 3219576 (1965-11-01), Makabe
patent: 3300404 (1967-01-01), Howe et al.
patent: 3401113 (1968-09-01), Pruessner et al.
patent: 3502566 (1970-03-01), Raymond et al.
patent: 3607736 (1971-09-01), Miyaji
patent: 3639263 (1972-02-01), Troscinski et al.
patent: 3867284 (1975-02-01), Kappe et al.
patent: 3930998 (1976-01-01), Knopp et al.
patent: 3959127 (1976-05-01), Bartha et al.
patent: 3959130 (1976-05-01), Kloster et al.
patent: 3966450 (1976-06-01), O'Neill et al.
patent: 4098690 (1978-07-01), Semmens
patent: 4108771 (1978-08-01), Weiss
patent: 4115258 (1978-09-01), Smith et al.
patent: 4148726 (1979-04-01), Smith
patent: 4153547 (1979-05-01), McLean
patent: 4297216 (1981-10-01), Ishida et al.
patent: 4446031 (1984-05-01), List
patent: 4501668 (1985-02-01), Merk et al.
patent: 4505819 (1985-03-01), Barnes et al.
patent: 4680127 (1987-07-01), Edmondson
patent: 4681687 (1987-07-01), Mouche et al.
patent: 4725405 (1988-02-01), Cassin et al.
patent: 4760027 (1988-07-01), Sublette
patent: 3414556 (1985-10-01), None
patent: 57-187099 (1982-11-01), None
Bryan, A. C., “Experiences With Odor Control at Houston, Texas”, Sew. & Ind. Wastes, 28, 1512 (1956).
Carpenter, W.T., “Sodium Nitrate Used to Control Nuisance”, Water Works and Sew., 79, 175 (1932).
Eliassen, R., et al., “The Effect of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons on Hydrogen Sulfide Production”, Sew. Works Jour., 21, 457 (1949).
Fales, A.L., “Treatment of Industrial Wastes from Paper Mills and Tannery on Neponset River”, Jour. Ind. Eng. Chem., 21, 216 (1929).
Heukelekian, H., “Effect of the Addition of Sodium Nitrate to Sewage on Hydrogen Sulfide Production and B.O.D. Reduction”, Sewage Works Journal 15(2):255-261 (1943).
Heukelekian, H., “Some Bacteriological Aspects of Hydrogen Sulfide Production from Sewage”, Sew. Works Jour., 20, 490 (1948).
Lawrance, W.A., “The Addition of Sodium Nitrate to the Androscoggin River”, Sew. and Ind. Wastes, 22, 820 (1950).
Lorgan, G.P., et al., “Nitrate Addition for the Control of Odor Emissions from Organically Overloaded, Super Rate Trickling Filters”, 33rd Ann. Purdue Ind. Waste Conf., West Lafayette, Ind., (1978).
McKinney, R.E., “The Role of Chemically Combined Oxygen in Biological Systems”, Jour. San. Eng. Div., proc. Amer. Soc. Civil Engr., 82 SA4, 1053 (1956).
Poduska, R.A., “Operation, Control, and Dynamic Modeling of the Tennessee Eastman Company Industrial Wastewater Treatment System”, 34th Ann. Purdue Indust. Waste Conf., Lafayette, Md. (1970).
Pomery, R.D., “Controlling Sewage Plant Odors”, Consulting Eng., Feb. 101 (1963).
Pomeroy, R.D., et al., “Sulfide Occurrence and Control in Sewage Collection Systes”, U.S. Environmental protection Agency, EPA 600/X-85-052, Cincinnati, Ohio (1985).
Prakasam, T.B.S., et al., “Microbial Dentrification of a Wastewater Containing high Concentrations of Oxidized Nitrogen”, Proceedings of the 31st Industrial Wste Conference, May 4-6, 1976, Purdue University.
Price, E.C., et al., “Sewage Treatment Plants Combat Odor Pollution Problems”, Water and Sew. Works, 125, 10, 64 (1978).
Reid, G.W., et al., “Sewer Odor Studies”, Sew. and Ind. Wstes, 28, 991 (1956).
Ryan, W.A., “Experiences with Sodium Nitrate Treatment of Cannery Wastes”, Sew. Works Jour., 17, 1227 (1945).
Santry, I.W., Jr., “Hydrogen Sulfide Odor Control Measures”, Jour. Water Poll. Control Fed., 38 459 (1966).
Santry, I.W., Jr., “Hydrogen Sulfide in Sewers”, Jour. Water Poll. Control Fed., 35, 1580 (1963).
“Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater”, 14th Ed., Amer. Pub. Health Assn., Wash. D.C., 499-509 1976,.
Peter R. Willenbring et al., “Calcium Nitrate” (incomplete title), Oct. 1988 or earlier.
“Biochemical Oxidation of Polluted Lake Sediment with Nitrate—A new Lake Restoration Method”, 1976.
R.R. Dague, “Fundamentals of Odor Control”, Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, 44(4): 583-594: Apr. 1972.
William H. Moss et al., “Full-scale use of physical/chemical treatment of domestic wastewater at Rocky River, Ohio”, Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, 49(11): 2.249-2,254; Nov. 1977.
Leon S. Directo et al., “Pilot plant study of physical-chemical treatment”, Journal Water Pollution Control Federatio
Davis H. Forbes
Hunniford David J.
Nixon & Vanderhye P.C.
U.S. Filter Corporation
Upton Christopher
LandOfFree
Process for removal of dissolved hydrogen sulfide and... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Process for removal of dissolved hydrogen sulfide and..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Process for removal of dissolved hydrogen sulfide and... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2470711