Process for no-detection in fluid media

Chemistry: electrical and wave energy – Apparatus – Electrolytic

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C204S426000, C205S781000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06231734

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This application claims the priority of German patent document 197 14 364.4-52, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein.
The invention relates to a process for detecting nitrogen oxide (NO) in fluid media.
Several methods are known for removing nitrogen from diesel engine exhaust gases. A catalytic removal of nitrogen can be carried out by using ammonia or hydrocarbons as reducing agents. Adsorber catalysts can remove nitrogen by the adsorption of NO
x
, but must be regenerated at regular short intervals by using reducing agents. Also, nitrogen oxide emission can be reduced by returning exhaust gas into the combustion chamber. This effect can be enhanced by enriching the returned exhaust gas with NO
x
by using suitable adsorber materials.
But, material-based nitrogen removal processes are based on knowing load-dependent and rotational-speed-dependent momentary NO
x
-emissions for metering of the reducing agent and the adsorption/regeneration periods. This can take place either by using an NO-sensor or by using characteristic diagram values filed in a memory of a computer.
Characteristic NO
x
-diagrams do not apply to individual engines but only to series of engines so that fluctuations in the crude NO
x
-gas content caused by manufacturing may occur while characteristic diagram points are the same. In addition, momentary catalyst condition (temperature, NO
x
-load and reducing agent load) may be different while characteristic diagram points are the same. An NO-sensor-controlling regulation would therefore be preferred. When an NO-sensor is used, exhaust gas recirculation rate can be controlled such that minimal NO
x
-emission occurs at each engine operating point.
The literature describes a number of sensors for measurement of NO-content in gases. However, only a few are suitable for conditions in real exhaust gas that is hot.
In principle, ceramic solid electrolytes offer a high potential for the application because they are highly selective, resistant to high temperatures and are not expensive to build. This can be seen by the considerable success of the &lgr;-sensor, an oxygen ion conductor based on zirconia. For this principle to be effective for NO, a solid NO
+
electrolyte is required.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,466,350 describes an amperometric thin-film solid-electrolyte detector for NO which is based on the passage of nitrosonium cations (NO
+
) through the solid electrolyte. Four electrodes are required in a bipotentiostat arrangement: a first and a second working electrode, a joint reference electrode and a joint counter electrode. In addition, a diffusion barrier is used in front of the working electrode acting as the anode; the diffusion barrier provides that the sensor operates under diffusion-controlled conditions. Only in this manner can it be ensured that the output signal is proportional to the NO-concentration in the gas.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,466,350, a NO-&bgr;-Al
2
O
3
is used as the solid electrolyte and is manufactured in two steps from Na-&bgr;-Al
2
O
3
. First, the Na-&bgr;-Al
2
O
3
is exchanged in an AgNO
3
-melt with Ag
+
to Ag-&bgr;-Al
2
O
3
. In a second step, Ag-&bgr;-Al
2
O
3
is exchanged with NO
+
while utilizing NOCl-ions so that finally NO-&bgr;-Al
2
O
3
is obtained. This second step requires a medium which simultaneously has a good solubility for NO
+
as well as for Ag
+
and good oxidation resistance at temperatures about 200° C.
The state of the art according to U.S. Pat. No. 5,466,350 has the following disadvantages:
The bipotentiostat arrangement uses four electrodes. In contrast to a two-electrode arrangement, this represents a clearly more complicated arrangement with respect to design, manufacturing and operation.
So that the ionic current in the solid electrolyte in an amperometric measuring principle is proportional to the NO-concentration in the gas phase, a diffusion barrier must be integrated.
Furthermore, as the result of the principle, the suggested amperometric sensor principle with the diffusion limitation is slow because it is diffusion-dependent. Also, sensor signal quality depends on sensor surface quality (coating by soot particles). In the real exhaust gas of a motor vehicle, a constant and continuously accurate relation between NO concentration and sensor reading can therefore not be achieved.
In addition, a basic disadvantage of the amperometric measuring principle is cross-sensitivity to water vapor which exists in exhaust gas in high concentrations. Because a voltage of at least 1.6 volts—the literature value of 1.31 V relates to the calomel electrode—is required for the NO-oxidation, reactions with water vapor also may take place on the first working electrode (anode). For example:
2H
2
O
O
2
+4H
+
+4
e

(1.229 V)
2NO+H
2
O
N
2
O
4
+4H
+
+4
e

(1.035 V)
The Protons formed according to these reactions are also transported through the electrolyte and, like NO, are reduced on the second working electrode, which acts as the cathode. The measured current is therefore composed of the sum of NO
+
and H
+
.
With respect to the manufacture of the NO
+
-conducting solid electrolyte according to U.S. Pat. No. 5,466,350, there are the following disadvantages:
The suggested manufacturing process for the NO
+
-conducting solid electrolyte requires working in aggressive, non-hydrolysis-resistant salt melts and is carried out in a very cumbersome manner in several steps. In particular, cleaning of the solid electrolyte after the ion exchange with water and alcohol required when a salt melt is used is problematic and may damage the electrolyte (hydrolysis of NO to HNO
3
). The limitation to 190° C. (starting decomposition of the NO salt melt) and the concentration difference between the melt and the electrolyte as the only driving force makes the complete ion exchange impossible in dense layers of &bgr;″-Al
2
O
3
. However, gas-tight thin layers of pure &bgr;&Dgr;-Al
2
O
3
are necessary for a technical implementation of the results for a fast sensor.
A basic disadvantage of the exchange reactions in the melt or in the solution is that the moving force of the reaction is represented by the formation of insoluble products, such as AgCl when an Ag
+
-ion conductor is used in an NOCl-containing melt. From preliminary investigations, it is known (R. H. Radzilowski, J. T. Kummer,
Inorg. Chem.,
8 (1996) 2531; S. Maraun, Diploma thesis, University GH Essen, 1996) that these insoluble residues may precipitate on the solid electrolyte and prevent exchange by passivation. This requires that starting materials are used which are as fine-grained as possible and which, after the exchange, must first be chemically processed and then compacted to molded bodies. As will be illustrated in the following, in the process according to the invention, molded bodies of the desired shape can be used directly.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,466,350 is based on Na-&bgr;-Al
2
O
3
. In contrast to Li-stabilized Na-&bgr;″-Al
2
O
3
, Na-&bgr;-Al
2
O
3
has a different layer sequence and a resulting lower ion conductivity. In addition, it may be affected by hydrolysis. As a rule, it contains high (>1%) parts of NaAlO
2
which is responsible for this water delicacy. A quantitatively complete exchange of Na
+
for Ag
+
is therefore not possible. The remaining Na results in a strong decomposition due to hydrolysis in real exhaust gas and therefore in a fast destruction of the electrolyte in real exhaust gas.
Summarizing, the following disadvantages exist for implementing a sensor according to U.S. Pat. No. 5,466,359, particularly with a view to motor vehicle applications:
no purely potentiometric measuring principle (&lgr;-sensor); this leads to a slow sensor kinetic and requires an expensive sensor technology and also expensive sensor electronics.
low stability of the solid electrolyte to hydrolysis results in a destruction of the electrolyte during an operation in real exhaust gas;
expensive pro

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Process for no-detection in fluid media does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Process for no-detection in fluid media, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Process for no-detection in fluid media will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2465668

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.