Measuring and testing – With fluid pressure – Porosity or permeability
Reexamination Certificate
2000-09-01
2002-04-16
Williams, Hezron (Department: 2856)
Measuring and testing
With fluid pressure
Porosity or permeability
C073S04050A
Reexamination Certificate
active
06370943
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a process and to a device intended to monitor the integrity of microfiltration or ultrafiltration modules which are used in procedures for separating and concentrating solutions and especially in the field of water treatment.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
It is known that such modules use a number of hollow fibres grouped together in bundles and the problem for which the present invention proposes a solution is that of detecting a fibre rupture which leads to fluid passing directly from the dirty side of the membrane (concentrate) to the clean side (permeate) through the fibre or fibres which are completely or partially broken.
To date there are a number of processes for detecting the modification of the integrity of micro- or ultrafiltration modules which can be placed into two categories:
processes monitoring treated water quality,
processes detecting leaks using a physical procedure.
A few details will be given below concerning the state of the prior art corresponding to processes belonging to the two categories above:
Monitoring Treated Water Quality
Measurement of Turbidity
Water treated through a membrane generally has a turbidity of lower than 0.1 NTU (nephelometric turbidity unit). A failure in the module integrity should therefore be translated into an increase in turbidity. However if the water to be treated is not very turbid, the effect of dilution makes it impossible to detect a leak from one broken fibre out of tens of thousands of fibres, i.e. several modules. Detection will only be effective if the water to be treated is very contaminated. For example, if contaminated water is treated with 0.8 g/l of active carbon in powder form, one broken fibre out of 120,000 (8 modules) is easily detected. With low turbidity raw water, for example 0.5 NTU, the detection of one broken fibre out of 15,000 (a single module) is not assured.
Particle Counting
This process is much more sensitive than that of measuring turbidity but it also has limits. With this technique, it is possible to detect one broken fibre out of 420,000 fibres treating relatively contaminated water (0.15 mg/l of active carbon) and operating in tangential mode. In frontal mode and with low turbidity water, it is possible to detect a broken fibre in only a few modules, i.e. around 100,000 fibres. In addition, this process requires considerable care and maintenance.
Bacteriological Analyses
This is a process which is arduous and lengthy to implement and which is subject to external contamination. At least two consecutive negative results are needed in order to start confirming a leak. This process may use a Colibacillus detector, but it has been noted that, even when not intact, the membranes generally produced water free from
Escherichiae Coli
. This system therefore cannot be applied. Furthermore, detection requires several days.
In conclusion, methods based on monitoring treated water quality are more or less reliable and they have limited accuracy. They are global, given that the measurement is carried out at station level for a group of filtration machines, or at best a single machine comprising several modules. So other methods then need to be applied to find the failed module. The detection process is therefore too lengthy.
Detection of Leaks
Air Pressure Test
This is the most well-known test which consists in trapping a volume of air under pressure on one side of the membrane and in measuring the time required for a given drop of pressure through the membrane. Since the pores of the membrane are filled with water, the air diffuses slowly through this water and the pressure drops slowly at a standard rate. If the drop is faster, this means that the membrane leaks and therefore that at least one fibre is broken. This method is relatively accurate if it is implemented module by module. However, in this case a manual operation is needed to isolate the module and to connect up the air. This method is approximate when it is implemented on the scale of one filtration machine. Furthermore, the ageing of modules causes the speed of air diffusion to vary and it then becomes difficult to distinguish between a broken fibre and a general increase in the porosity of the membrane.
Air Diffusion Test
When implementing this process, one of the sides of the membrane is kept under water and the other is subjected to a low air pressure. If the membrane is not intact, the air passing through the leak causes a rapid increase in the water side pressure. This technique is free from interference due to air diffusion which is much slower in this case, since the water needs to become saturated with dissolved air then it needs degassing before air diffusion occurs.
Acoustic Detection
This technique consists in using a stethoscope to identify a module which leaks when air passes through a broken fibre. The “bubbling” thus produced on the water side is easily audible. This auscultation is carried out by an operator.
WO 94 09890 describes a process for detecting a defective fibre in a filtration system having microfiltration membranes. According to this process, a gas under pressure is delivered into the vessel contained between the fibres of the membrane and the filter envelope and the formation of bubbles, indicating the presence of a defective fibre, is detected at the ends of the fibres. This process therefore makes use of a “bubble point”, after isolating the module or the bank of several modules. It therefore involves a biphasic, gas-liquid system which can only be used after the plant is shut down.
WO 94/11729 also relates to a detection method which requires a plant shutdown with the presence of gas on both sides of the membrane.
U.S. Pat. No.-A-4744240 relates to a process for treating microfiltration modules which also makes use of the application of a gas through a membrane and measurement of a bubble point which is representative of the size of the pores or the holes present in the membrane. In this system, which is a biphasic gas-liquid system, the plant also has to be shut down to make the measurement.
In conclusion, the technique for monitoring the integrity of modules based on leak detection is a global technique applied to a set of modules (a filtration machine) and making it possible to detect a leak without the possibility of identifying the failed module. This technique can only be implemented during a production shutdown and it requires a minimum of several minutes. Furthermore, should a failure be noticed, an additional intervention (for example listening by stethoscope) needs to be carried out in order to identify the failed module, this listening also having to be carried out after production shutdown.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention intends to provide a process which does not have the drawbacks of the solutions mentioned above.
The subject of the invention is therefore a process for monitoring the integrity of hollow fibre filtration modules and for detecting leaks of treated liquid through a fibre completely or partially broken, characterized in that it consists, continuously and in filtration mode, without production shutdown, in:
detecting the noise caused by the passage of the liquid through a ruptured fibre;
amplifying the noise signal thus obtained, and
comparing the amplified signal thus obtained with a threshold noise level, within the same range of frequencies, which is characteristic of intact modules, this comparison making it possible to detect whether or not the module is intact.
The subject of the invention is also a device for implementing the process specified above, this device being characterized in that it comprises:
a hydrophone mounted on the low purge of each module, in contact with the permeate in such a way as to continuously listen to the noise of the liquid passing in filtration mode;
an amplifier of the signals delivered by the said sensor, and
a comparator-analyser ensuring the comparison of the amplified noise signal from the sensor with a threshold noise level characteristic of an intact module, th
Chevalier M. R.
Glucina K.
Laine J. M.
Moulart P.
Connolly Bove & Lodge & Hutz LLP
Cygan Michael
Suez-Lyonnaise des Eaux
Williams Hezron
LandOfFree
Process for monitoring the integrity of hollow fiber... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Process for monitoring the integrity of hollow fiber..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Process for monitoring the integrity of hollow fiber... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2819160