Synthetic resins or natural rubbers -- part of the class 520 ser – Synthetic resins – Processes of preparing a desired or intentional composition...
Reexamination Certificate
1998-11-20
2001-11-27
Michl, Paul R. (Department: 1714)
Synthetic resins or natural rubbers -- part of the class 520 ser
Synthetic resins
Processes of preparing a desired or intentional composition...
Reexamination Certificate
active
06323260
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
In one of its aspects, the present invention relates to the hydrophobizing of particles, particularly inorganic water-insoluble compounds. In another of its aspects, the present invention also relates to the treated particles, pe. The treated particles are useful particularly, but not exclusively in the compounding of polymers, especially rubbers and plastics. In another of its aspects, the present invention also relates to dispersions of the treated particles in a polymer-containing matrix (binder) and to a process for preparing such dispersions.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Raw polymers, either rubbers or plastics rarely have the inherent physical or chemical properties in their pure state that are necessary to make useful articles. The polymers must thus be further compounded by mixing with additional ingredients or “additives”. Polymer additives may include one or more of: secondary polymers; extender oils; fillers; antioxidants; coloring pigments, stabilizers, flame retardants, processing aids and other ancillary chemicals. For rubbers, this list may be extended to include curatives (vulcanizing agents) such as sulfur or organic peroxides; cure accelerators such as dibenzothiazyl disulphide (MBTS) and tetramethylthiuram disulfide (TMTD), as well as inorganic cure activators such as zinc oxide, lead monoxide (PbO, litharge), red lead (Pb
3
O
4
), and the like. Regardless of whether it is plastic or rubber properties in which improvement is sought, the selected additive materials must be mixed intimately with the polymer at the compounding stage (so as to obtain a homogeneous dispersion) in order for the maximum improvements to be realized. Conventionally, this mixing is usually accomplished on an open mill, in a mixing extruder or in an internal mixer (such as the Henschel, Welex or Banbury types) using one or more steps until the desired degree of dispersion is achieved.
Quite often, a satisfactory dispersion of the additive in the polymer is difficult to attain in a reasonable time, resulting in inhomogeneity which translates into unacceptable physical properties or appearance in the finished compound. To improve the dispersion, an extended mixing time or multi-stage mixing cycle must be employed which lowers productivity in the mixing plant and is thus undesirable.
Within the industry, it is known that mixing of inorganic chemicals such as the inorganic activators used in the rubber industry presents special difficulties in this regard because of the inherent hardness and much higher viscosity of these chemicals relative to the polymer matrix.
One general method of facilitating mixing and dispersion of these inorganic materials into polymer compounds in the factory is to use a very fine particle size inorganic material. However, this inevitably generates dust during both the material handling and mixing process and in many cases these dust particles are toxic or otherwise unacceptable from a worker health standpoint. Dust losses also change the ratio of the chemicals to the base polymer from what was originally intended; this may lead to poor processing or poor finished properties in the compound. In some specific cases (i.e. with talc), very fine particles may act as a lubricant and actually contribute to poor mixing of the bulk, in this case by reducing the shear which is needed for dispersion. In other cases, especially where polar ingredients must be mixed into a non-polar polymer, agglomeration of the particles may occur during mixing, leading to undesirable inhomogeneity and unsatisfactory physical properties.
To mitigate the above problems, it is well known in the art to add the inorganic chemicals to the base polymer in a predispersed form, e.g., as fine particles bound in a low viscosity medium (or binder) such as polymer or oil, or combinations thereof with additional additives. This bound form of inorganic chemicals overcomes the dust problem in the rubber compounding plant and also greatly shortens the dispersing time of the inorganic materials in the polymer compound, particularly if the binder is chemically similar to the base polymer and the viscosity of the pre-dispersion closely matches that of the rest of the compound. From a compounding standpoint, it is desirable to have the minimum amount of binder that will both facilitate dispersion and eliminate dusting during processing.
These types of ‘concentrates’ or ‘dispersions’ thus typically contain from about 50% to 95% by weight of the active inorganic chemical dispersed in a suitable binder (practically, this corresponds to a range of from 100 to 1900 parts by weight of inorganic chemical per 100 parts by weight of binder). Many such materials are commercially available from a number of suppliers to the rubber industries. Non-limiting examples of such commercial polymer-bound materials used in the rubber industry are: RHENOGRAN® ZnO-85 (85 weight percent zinc oxide dispersed in an EPDM/EVA binder); POLY-DISPERSION® PLD-90 (90 weight percent lead monoxide dispersed in polyisobutylene); RHENOGRAN® Pb
3
O
4
-90 (90 weight percent red lead oxide dispersed in EPDM/EVA), all available from Rhein-Chemie Corporation and Rhein Chemie Rheinau GmbH.
Cheaper oil-based binders may also be used; while these address the dust problem, they do not offer as good or as rapid a dispersion as the presence of oil lowers the friction necessary to cause comminution of the inorganic materials during mixing. The presence of oil may also cause other changes in the physical properties (i.e. softening) or appearance (colour) which are undesirable. An example of the latter type of dispersion is Polydex™ PPD (ZnO) 75, a 75 weight percent blend of ZnO in a light process oil, available from Polychem.
In the plastics industry, it is often desired to modify the viscosity (i.e., the “melt index”), hardness, color, light-fastness and/or other properties of the base polymer in order to render it processible or suitable for its intended end-use application. Again, these additives (chemicals), in their pure form, may be added directly to the bulk plastic during the processing (compounding) phase; although, it is more customary to use the materials as concentrates in liquid or pellet form in order to obtain better dispersion and better control of the process. Again, these concentrates consist of a dispersion of fine particles of the additive in a suitable carrier or ‘binder’ which may be similar or identical to the base polymer, or it may be another compatible polymer or a combination of polymers and oil. Also, other ingredients (e.g., soaps, compatibilizing agents and dispersing aids) may be included in the base of the binder. This concentrate form is used almost exclusively for introducing inorganic colorants into plastics where the high hardness and high melting point of the additives causes dispersion problems. Many companies currently supply inorganic and organic additive concentrates to the plastics industry; non-limiting examples of the latter materials include: ComPETe™, CELPRO™, Holoflake™, Hanna-FX™(M.A. Hanna Color), BARKOLEN™ (SPUR™ a.s.), POLYPLUS™ (PolyTech South Inc.), CEK CONCENTRATES™, COLORPLAST™, CONCORDE™ (C.E.K. Concentrates) and the like.
Conventionally, these pre-dispersed forms of inorganic additives for use in the rubber and plastics industries have been produced by dry mechanical mixing or the ingredients—i.e., the additive in question is simply mechanically mixed with the binder material. Unfortunately, this approach serves only to transfer the mixing and dust problems from the compounders plant to that of the supplier of the dispersion. Moreover, the relatively high percentage of inorganic material to binder desirable in these dispersions moreover requires long mixing times or the use of special high energy mixing equipment (HIDM) which either lowers productivity or adds to the production costs. What would be most desirable is a dispersion manufacturing process that could be made essentially dust-free and moreover required little mixing energy to disperse th
Johansson Anders H.
Koski Ahti A.
Bayer Inc.
Cheung Noland J.
Gil Joseph C.
Michl Paul R.
LandOfFree
Process for hydrophobicizing particles and their use in... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Process for hydrophobicizing particles and their use in..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Process for hydrophobicizing particles and their use in... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2596372