Stone working – Splitting – shearing – and punching
Reexamination Certificate
2000-07-26
2003-04-01
Hail, III, Joseph J. (Department: 3723)
Stone working
Splitting, shearing, and punching
C125S024000, C125S036000, C125S040000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06539933
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention concerns a process for forming tunnels, splitting stones and especially cap or shell-splitting rocks or splitting of rocks preferably to pre-worked, square blocks, or blocks with at least one straight or plane surface. The invention also concerns a tool for performing the process.
When splitting stone blocks it is common to drill a row of parallel holes with a regular distance from each other where the splitting/parting is to take place. Explosives, expanding chemical substances or compositions and/or different types of splitting tools have conventionally been used to split rocks.
When rocks are split with explosives the explosive is filled into the previously bored holes in the rock and are detonated to loosen/split the block. Such explosive charges will also preferably be detonated simultaneously to loosen the block, and the determination of the quantity of explosives or explosive charges must be done with utmost care and precision to avoid blowing the block to pieces. Additionally, when working with natural rock or decorative stones or slabs, the stone may be damaged by the explosion, and when working with explosives there is also a risk of personnel injuries. The drawbacks with explosives are obvious since this creates a large amount of cracks. Invisible flaws may not appear until after the stone is split with explosives. Furthermore, this creates smaller or larger cracks in the stone masses left after the explosion. This is dangerous work wherein the quality of the result is at best uncertain.
When splitting rocks with expanding chemical substances or compositions, such substances will initially be filled into the bore holes and subsequently exert their expanding effect on the rock. This method is much more controllable than and less stringent than splitting the rock with explosives, but also here it is necessary to carefully measure and add the correct amount of expanding material to overcome the tensile strength of the rock, and additionally some post-handling of the split stone material will be necessary. Additionally, the splitting of rock with an expanding chemical material will be time-consuming, and this is poorly suited for use in an effective stone quarry.
When using wedges for splitting rocks according to the prior art, wedges are gradually driven into the bore holes. The driving of wedges will frequently be done with the use of a sledgehammer/pneumatic piledriver and eventually the wedges will overcome the tensile strength of the rock, resulting in the rock splitting.
The most common way to drive the wedges manually into the rock is by predrilling the splitting holes as indicated supra. A number of wedges are then placed inside the predrilled holes, and they are then driven sequentially and manually into the holes by starting the splitting at one edge of the rock, driving the wedge nearest to the edge into its hole, then driving the next wedge in the hole adjacent to the first one downwards into its hole, etc; and when reaching the farthest edge of the rock repeating the driving sequence until a slab is split from the rock. This manual splitting is obviously very time-consuming and cumbersome, and it is difficult to split rock slabs off from the mother rock beyond the reach of the wedge or splitting tool.
Work with different types of splitting tools are also associated with danger, albeit less than when using explosives, and such splitting of rock may also be used under conditions where blowing-up the rock with explosives is neither possible or nor suitable. However, the splitting of the rock puts certain demands on the splitting tool, and the splitting of slabs or blocks of rock has until today been difficult because it has not been possible to guide the splitting of the rock sufficiently by using conventional splitting tools.
DESCRIPTION OF RELATED ART
In Norwegian patent 13.161 there is shown a splitting tool wherein a gliding wedge is compounded with a piston rod in the centre axis of a hydraulic cylinder, and wherein two or more insert pieces with a circular cross section are connected with the cylinder housing. The insert pieces have angular surfaces which downwards forms a narrowing wedge space. There arise tensile forces in the stone block from the bore hole when the sliding wedge gradually is pressed into the wedge space by using hydraulic pressure. The drawback with this tool lies inter alia in the location of the sliding wedge in the centre of the tool, since this makes it impossible to split thin slabs off stone blocks and it is furthermore impossible to split off slabs farther down the slab than the length of the wedge tool. Each wedge is additionally a very heavy unit and is poorly suited for any practical production of natural stone slabs or working in tunnels. In addition the wedges must have a suitable hydraulic aggregate on account of the high pressure which is necessary to build up in the tool, a pressure which depends on the rock type which is to be split, and which with rock types with a large tensile strength may be relatively significant.
Another drawback with a splitting tool which formerly is known from Norwegian patent 113.161 is that such a tool comprises a central piston rod in the wedge and which passes the insert pieces placed in the drilled hole in the rock to be split. Since the central piston rod in the wedge passes the insert pieces, which consequently are pushed aside and pressed against the sides of the drilled hole, the piston rod may easily become stuck in the bottom of the drilled hole or it may break, something which in turn leads to a reduced efficiency because inordinately long drilling holes must be drilled when using this type of tool. Additionally the wedge disclosed in this prior art patent, is not able to split the rock in close proximity to a surface on account of the total circumference of the cylinder being significantly larger than the wedge itself. Furthermore it is a drawback that all of the force from the wedge is distributed over a very small surface so that the rock consequently may be damaged in the breaking zone and lead to a poor product.
It is known from Norwegian patent 172.260 a tool for splitting rocks wherein the tool comprises a securing bolt to be introduced into a predrilled hole in the stone block. The splitting tool comprises additionally an arm mechanism being guided by a hydraulic cylinder with an impingement point against the stone block at a given distance from the drilled hole, and which also works as an anchorage point for the securing bolt of the tool. When supplying hydraulic oil to the hydraulic cylinder, the tool is given a pushing force from the impingement point on the stone block so that a tilting movement arises in the tool. This has as a consequence that the securing bolt is tilted against the adjacent sides of the drilled hole so that tensile scissoring forces arise in the rock. The drawback of such a splitting method is that the wedge will have a point-formed breaking force so that there arises a large degree of deformations around the breaking point, and when splitting thin slabs there will be created a very irregular block form in the product since the wedges exert force against the surface instead of creating initial cracks against the drilled hole at its side. Blocks with such an uneven form are not desirable for potential receivers of the raw blocks.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,020,859 discloses a splitting tool designed so that the wedges are not produced with so small a diameter so that they may be used for producing natural rocks or in the entrepreneur trade. An example given in this patent is based on drilling holes with a diameter over 105 mm, something which is unsuitable for slab-splitting thin stone slabs. In addition this tool is meant to split[ting of] materials with a very high cohesive strength, e.g. for destroying armed concrete.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
For splitting stone having been equipped with a number of drilling holes being located along a substantially straight line and being substantially straight along th
Grant Allen J.
Hail III Joseph J.
Ladas & Parry
Stu-Stein, Teknologi og Utvikling
LandOfFree
Process and device for splitting stones does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Process and device for splitting stones, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Process and device for splitting stones will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3050196