Process and apparatus for melting metal

Specialized metallurgical processes – compositions for use therei – Processes – Electrothermic processes

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C075S010150, C266S237000, C373S004000, C373S142000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06221123

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to methods and devices for processing metals, and in particular, methods and devices for melting steel and/or iron objects efficiently.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Conventional and commercially available melting systems include reverberatory, crucible, open hearth, cupola, electric induction, electric channel, electric arc, fuel assisted electric arc, conventional cupola, gas/oil fired vertical shaft furnaces with water-cooled grates and fuel-fired rotary drum furnaces. While all of these systems can and do operate to melt and superheat metal, there is room for improvement of each of these systems with respect to cost of installation, adaptability to a wide selection of fuels, cost of operation, cost of maintenance, flexibility of operation, equipment size, control of metallurgical properties, degree of potential pollution, installation cost of pollution controls and cost of operation of pollution controls.
Cupola melting units are efficient, low-cost melting devices especially in high ton-per-hour (over 50) units; however, they have a number of drawbacks. Using coke as the primary fuel, cupola operations are undesirably dependent on coke prices and availability. Because of the sulphur content of the coke, cupola melted irons can have excessive sulphur levels that are a problem in the production of ductile irons. Cupola off-gases are especially toxic and expensive to clean in order to meet governmental air quality standards for sulphur and particulate emissions. Cupolas are difficult to operate on an intermittent basis. When stopped, the delicate temperature equilibriums necessary for effective operation are destroyed and metallurgical control is made extremely difficult.
It is known to melt a charge in a vertical shaft furnace by feeding the charge into the top of the shaft furnace to form a column of charge in the furnace, and then melting the column from below with a flame. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,224,985 to Kullik et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,877,449 to Khinkis, U.S. Pat. No. 4,097,028 to Langhammer and U.S. Pat. No. 1,713,543 to Machlet.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,560,304 to Duchateau et al. discloses a furnace which employs a gas oxygen burner on a rotating barrel furnace; however this furnace is large and operates in a batch mode rather than continuously.
Vertical shaft furnaces with water-cooled grates operate successfully, but also have a number of drawbacks. The water-cooled pipes or grates have the potential for damage and leaking in such an environment. Water and water vapor are extremely detrimental to metallurgical properties of metal in the molten, superheated state of such a furnace. Further, the flame temperature and the metal temperature difference and therefore the efficiency of the system suffers as the operator attempts go above 2550° F. Metal in the molten condition at such temperatures is also highly susceptible to undesired oxidation. Metal is then guided into some form of electric furnace for superheating to temperatures required for treatment, pouring, processing or casting. This method is inefficient from an energy perspective and further exposes the molten metal to oxidizing conditions. Silicon losses can go as high as 1% of the charge weight, a loss that can be very expensive as the lost silicon must be replaced. Oxidized irons also exhibit inferior metallurgical properties.
Electric melting, whether it be induction, induction channel or arc, is an efficient and effective way to process metal. Recovery of ingredients and additives is nearly 100%, as there is little oxidation since the metal charges are preheated primarily for removing water and for a small assist in melting efficiency. Arc furnaces can be fitted with fuel burners to assist in the melting down of the charge and are highly efficient melters. However, installation of dust collectors, which is required for electric furnaces, is a major expense. Further, installation of a large electric furnace is very costly. In terms of overall efficiency from a macroeconomic perspective, electric furnaces are not necessarily very efficient, since only 22% of the coal burned in a power plant is typically converted to electric power, which can then be used to power an electric furnace. The remainder is wasted heat and excessive production of CO
2
gases.
Thus, there has been a need for more efficient furnaces for melting metals, which are less costly to install and maintain.
All references cited herein are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention addresses the foregoing deficiencies of the prior art by providing a method for melting a metal, the method comprising:
providing an apparatus comprising:
a vertical shaft furnace having a top portion, an intermediate portion, a bottom portion and at least one shaft furnace heating device preferably selected from the group consisting of a gas burner and electric arc generator; and
a horizontal induction furnace in fluid communication with, and at least partially below, said shaft furnace;
feeding said metal into said top portion of said shaft furnace to form a column of said metal within said shaft furnace;
preheating metal in a bottom of said metal column with said at least one shaft furnace heating device to a temperature below a melting temperature of said metal;
contacting said preheated metal with a molten pool of metal in said induction furnace to melt said metal; and
removing from said apparatus at least a portion of said molten pool of metal.
The invention also provides an apparatus for melting a metal by the foregoing method, and an exhaust fumes treatment apparatus for treating the fumes generated in the method.


REFERENCES:
patent: 1713543 (1929-05-01), Machlet
patent: 2922869 (1960-01-01), Giannini et al.
patent: 3147330 (1964-09-01), Gage
patent: 3194941 (1965-07-01), Baird
patent: 3663203 (1972-05-01), Davis et al.
patent: 3673375 (1972-06-01), Camacho
patent: 4032123 (1977-06-01), Cruse, Jr. et al.
patent: 4033562 (1977-07-01), Collin
patent: 4097028 (1978-06-01), Langhammer
patent: 4129289 (1978-12-01), Miyasita et al.
patent: 4309170 (1982-01-01), Ward
patent: 4311519 (1982-01-01), Berry
patent: 4685657 (1987-08-01), Okubo et al.
patent: 4786321 (1988-11-01), Hoster et al.
patent: 4877449 (1989-10-01), Khinkis
patent: 5224985 (1993-07-01), Kullik et al.
patent: 5407462 (1995-04-01), Areaux
patent: 5411570 (1995-05-01), Fourie
patent: 5560304 (1996-10-01), Duchateau et al.
patent: 5563904 (1996-10-01), Colpo et al.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Process and apparatus for melting metal does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Process and apparatus for melting metal, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Process and apparatus for melting metal will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2524226

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.