Metal treatment – Process of modifying or maintaining internal physical... – Heating or cooling of solid metal
Reexamination Certificate
1995-09-26
2002-06-18
Ip, Sikyin (Department: 1742)
Metal treatment
Process of modifying or maintaining internal physical...
Heating or cooling of solid metal
Reexamination Certificate
active
06406569
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a procedure for the thermal treatment of rails, in particular of the rail head in which, proceeding from temperatures above 720° C., cooling is carried out in a cooling agent that contains an additive of synthetic cooling agent.
2. Related Art
A procedure of the type described above is known, for example, from EP-PS 88 746. This known procedure uses synthetic cooling agent additives amounting to 20 to 50%-wt, in particular polyglycols, the additive of synthetic cooling agent ensuring, in the first place, averaging [homogenization] of the cooling conditions whilst maintaining a reduced cooling rate. Usually, synthetic quenching agents are used in the technology where it is necessary to maintain a minimal cooling rate in order to obtain a martensite structure. The objective of hardening of this kind is to harden the maximal cross-section and, in the case of objects that are of varying cross-sections, the areas of smaller cross-section will also be completely hardened. In applications of this type, the work piece can be left in the bath or hardening bath until temperature equalization takes place.
In the event that a synthetic quenching agent is used in conjunction with the thermal treatment of rails, any hardening of the rail web is undesirable. Furthermore, the objective is to achieve a finely pearlitized structure and the maintenance of a maximal cooling rate is required during fine pearlitizing of this kind. If, however, as in the known procedure, the optimal cooling rate that permits a fine pearlite structure without martensite or pearlite were to be used in the rail head, this would mean that the cooling rate for the essentially thinner rail web would be much too high.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Thus, it is the task of the present invention to create a procedure of the type described in the introduction hereto, with which the optimal cooling rates for the rail head can be maintained and, at the same time, any undesirable hardening of the essentially thinner web can be prevented. In order to solve this problem, the procedure according to the present invention is essentially such that treatment by immersion in the cooling agent is continued until such time as the surface temperature is between 450° C. and 550° C., without the temperature being equalized across the whole of the cross-section, after the removal of the immersed areas.
Because of the fact that removal takes place at a time at which the immersed areas have reached a surface temperature between 450 and 550° C. without temperature equalization across the whole of the cross-section, it is ensured that removal is early enough to prevent the formation of a hardness structure within the web. Were one to wait for temperature equalization there would, undoubtedly, be an undesirable hardening within the web; in this connection, the step taken according to the present invention, whereby a surface temperature of 450 and 550° C. is a criterion for the timeliness of the removal, this, in conjunction with the fact that a synthetic cooling agent additive is used, means that the cooling rate within the head is low enough to prevent any hardening within the web. At the same time, however, although the use of a synthetic cooling agent additive leads to a reduction of the cooling rate, it also ensures a cooling rate that is sufficiently high to ensure the formation of an extremely strong fine-perlitic structure within the rail head. In this connection, it is advantageous that the procedure according to the present invention be so carried out that synthetic additives such as, for example, glycols or polyglycols, are added to the cooling agent in a quantity that, at a bath temperature between 35 and 55° C., the transition from film boiling to the boiling phase takes place at a surface temperature of approximately 500° C., which thereby indicates the desired timepoint for removing the rails. In particular, the use of synthetic additives, preferably of glycols and polyglycols, in a quantity that ensures that the correct timepoint for the contraction of the rails is indicated by the bath boiling ensures that constant and optimal results are guaranteed both for the rail head and for the web. If, given an appropriate selection of the proportions of synthetic additives, boiling begins on the surface of the rails, the lower areas will certainly not yet have been converted into pearlite. Compared to cooling in a bath without synthetic cooling agent additives there is a relatively slower cooling period until the boiling point is reached.
Only after the boiling phase has been reached does the cooling rate increase rapidly; thus, the boiling point signals a relatively characteristic limit for the transition from relatively slower to relatively quicker cooling within the bath. Once the boiling point has been reached, or shortly thereafter, the work piece has to be removed if excessively rapid cooling is to be avoided, and adjustment of the film boiling in such a way that the head area of the rails permits optimal pearlite formation down to a depth of approximately 20 to 25 mm, leads, after removal, to the fact that the deeper areas are still converted into pearlite; in contrast to this, were the work pieces to be left in the bath after film boiling begins, martensite would be formed because of the more rapid cooling that would take place. Once the boiling point has been reached, cooling can be continued outside the bath slowly enough to ensure complete formation of pearlite which, as has been discussed above, would not be ensured once the boiling point has been reached because of the significantly quicker cooling within the bath. Furthermore, rapid cooling rates of this kind in the bath also result in the fact that the smaller web cross-section would be hardened more rapidly and there would still be an undesirable formation of martensite, which would naturally increase the risk of breakage.
Essential for the procedure according to the present invention is management of the procedure by selection of suitable quantities of synthetic cooling agent within the cooling agent, and precise determination of the time at which the immersed areas must be removed in order to prevent any undesirable hardening of other areas. The proportion of synthetic additives within the cooling agent determines the time of the transition from film boiling to the boiling phase, and the adjustment of the combination must be such that the boiling phase is first reached in the last cooling phase before removal, in order to ensure even cooling. The concentration that is set must be kept steady constantly, by using an appropriate monitoring system, which is not necessary during the usual use of the method according to the prior art; this must be done so as to ensure that this concentration, which is essential for timely identification of the time for removal, is not subjected to any variations in the course of the procedure. This also applies to the bath temperature.
In contrast to the known prior art, bath circulation must be kept constant. With reference to the rate at which the medium flows onto the rolled material or the rails that are to be cooled, in the present case it must be ensured that this is kept as steady as possible over the whole length of the rolled materials or the rails, throughout the whole of the thermal treatment. In the known procedure for hardening, when full immersion is made from the austenitic structural state, it is sufficient to keep to only a lower limit of this parameter in order to maintain the hardening effect. In contrast to this, the procedure according to the present invention relates to a combination of immersion temperature and immersion time that provides an optimal combination for partial immersion, the rails exhibiting a surface temperature between 450 and 550° C. at the end of the cooling period, with no temperature equalization across the whole of the cross section.
During partial submersion of the rails and immersion of the rail head, it is p
Moser Alfred
Pointner Peter
Prskawetz Georg
Greenblum & Bernstein P.L.C.
Ip Sikyin
Voest-Alpine Schienen GmbH
LandOfFree
Procedure for the thermal treatment of rails does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Procedure for the thermal treatment of rails, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Procedure for the thermal treatment of rails will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2977020