Probe design methods and microarrays for comparative genomic...

Data processing: measuring – calibrating – or testing – Measurement system in a specific environment – Biological or biochemical

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C702S020000, C703S011000, C703S012000, C707S700000

Reexamination Certificate

active

08036835

ABSTRACT:
Methods and systems for identifying and selecting nucleic acid probes for detecting a target with a nucleic acid probe array or comparative genome hybridization microarray, comprising selecting a plurality of potential target sequences, generating a plurality of candidate probes from the target sequences, filtering the plurality of candidate probes by analyzing candidate probes for selected probe properties in silico. Microarrays comprising probes selected by the methods of the invention are particularly useful for comparative genome hybridization and location analysis.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5348855 (1994-09-01), Dattagupta et al.
patent: 5447841 (1995-09-01), Gray et al.
patent: 5665549 (1997-09-01), Pinkel et al.
patent: 5830645 (1998-11-01), Pinkel et al.
patent: 5948902 (1999-09-01), Honkanen et al.
patent: 5965362 (1999-10-01), Pinkel et al.
patent: 6159685 (2000-12-01), Pinkel et al.
patent: 6171797 (2001-01-01), Perbost
patent: 6180351 (2001-01-01), Cattell
patent: 6197501 (2001-03-01), Cremer et al.
patent: 6210878 (2001-04-01), Pinkel et al.
patent: 6232072 (2001-05-01), Fisher
patent: 6242266 (2001-06-01), Schleifer et al.
patent: 6251588 (2001-06-01), Shannon et al.
patent: 6251601 (2001-06-01), Bao et al.
patent: 6323043 (2001-11-01), Caren et al.
patent: 6335167 (2002-01-01), Pinkel et al.
patent: 6465182 (2002-10-01), Gray et al.
patent: 2002/0006622 (2002-01-01), Bradley et al.
patent: 2003/0099964 (2003-05-01), Patil et al.
patent: WO 93/18186 (1993-09-01), None
patent: WO 99/23256 (1999-05-01), None
patent: WO 01/05935 (2001-01-01), None
patent: WO 01/23600 (2001-04-01), None
Angerer et al. In situ hybridization to cellular RNAs. Genetic Engineering: Principles and Methods, Setlow and Hollaender, Eds. 1981, vol. 7, pp. 43-65.
Brennan et al. High-resolution global profiling of genomic alterations with long oligonucleotide microarray. Cancer Research. 2004, vol. 64, pp. 4744-4748.
Breslauer et al. Predicting DNA duplex stability from the base sequence. PNAS. 1986, vol. 83, pp. 3746-3750.
Cai et al. Genome-wide detection of chromosomal imbalances in tumors using BAC microarrays. Nature Biotechnology. 2002, vol. 20, pp. 393-396.
Conlon et al. Integrating regulatory motif discovery and genome-wide expression analysis. PNAS. 2003, vol. 100, pp. 3339-3344.
Dong et al. Flexible use of high-density oligonucleotide arrays for single-nucleotide polymorphism discovery and validation. Genome Research. 2001, vol. 11, pp. 1418-1424.
Galla et al. Pyrenedecanoic acid and pyrene lecithin. Methods in Enzymology. 1981, vol. 72, pp. 470-480.
Hodgson et al. Genome scanning with array CGH delineates regional alterations in mouse islet carcinomas. Nature Genetics. 2001, vol. 29, pp. 459-464.
Kallioniemi et al. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science. 1992, vol. 258, pp. 818-821.
Lee et al. Human centromeric DNAs. Human Genetics. 1997, vol. 100, pp. 291-304.
Lee et al. Multi-objective evolutionary probe design based on thermodynamic criteria for HPV detection. PRICAI 2004, LNAI 3157. 2004, pp. 742-750.
Nielsen et al. Design of oligonucleotides for microarrays and perspectives for design of multi-transcriptome arrays. Nucleic Acids Research. 2003, vol. 31, pp. 3491-3496.
Pinkel et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nature Genetics. 1998, vol. 20, pp. 207-211.
Pollack et al. Microarray reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors. PNAS. 2002, vol. 99, pp. 12963-12968.
Rabinovitch et al. Pancolonic chromosomal instability precedes dysplasia and cancer in ulcerative colitis. Cancer Research. 1999, vol. 59, pp. 5148-5153.
Snijders et al. Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number. Nature Genetics. 2001, vol. 29, pp. 263-264.
Sugimoto et al. Improved thermodynamic parameters and helix initiation factor to predict stability of DNA duplexes. Nucleic Acids Research. 1996, vol. 24, pp. 4501-4505.
Talla et al. A novel design of whole-genome probes for Saccharomyces cerevisiae which minimizes cross-hybridization. BMC Genomics. 2003, vol. 4, pp. 1-18.
Trask et al. Human cytogenetics: 46 chromosomes, 46 years and counting. Nature Genetics. 2002, vol. 3, pp. 769-778.
Trinklein et al. Identification and functional analysis of human transcriptional promoters. Genome Research. 2003, vol. 13, pp. 308-312.
Wilhelm et al. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the differential diagnosis of renal cell cancer. Cancer Research. 2002, vol. 62, pp. 957-960.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Probe design methods and microarrays for comparative genomic... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Probe design methods and microarrays for comparative genomic..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Probe design methods and microarrays for comparative genomic... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4274043

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.