Print on two pages concurrently

Details Print on two pages concurrently Print on two pages concurrently

2001-07-10

2003-08-12

Nguyen, Judy (Department: 2853)

Incremental printing of symbolic information

Ink jet

Controller

C347S019000, C400S708000, C358S001180

Reexamination Certificate

active

06604804

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to printing apparatus, and particularly to ink-ejecting printing devices.
A print head includes an array of ink-ejecting nozzles. The print head scans, i.e., horizontally reciprocates, on a carriage across media and projects ink according to an intended image presentation, e.g., prints text or graphics across a page. A swath of image presentation across the page then lies along the print head swath path. The printer then advances the media past the print head swath path. By coordinating print head scanning, ink projection from the print head, and media advance, the printer deposits ink on the media in an appropriate pattern to generate the intended print image. A variety of methods of coordinating media advance and print head scanning have developed to efficiently deposit ink on the media. For example, some devices print in either direction, i.e., can print while the print head scans from right to left and can print while the print head scans from left to right.
Generally, the media advance distance equals the print head swath height. In other words, the print head lays down a pattern of ink across the page with a height or vertical distance, i.e., perpendicular to the scan direction, known as the “swath height.” By executing a scan and print maneuver across the page width, the printer deposits an ink pattern, i.e., image swath, with a vertical height corresponding to the swath height. Advancing the media by a distance equal to the swath height and between successive printing scans eventually exposes to the print head the entire vertical and horizontal dimensions of the media and gives opportunity for the print head to deposit ink on the entire media.
In some cases, however, the media advance does not equal the swath height. For example, the paper advance distance is less than the swath height when the device executes multiple passes relative to a given portion of the page. This is typical in photographic or high resolution/multi-color printing jobs where the print head requires one or more “passes” over a given portion of the media. The media advance height may in some cases exceed the swath height. For example, when no printing is required the media advance can be significantly more than swath height. This action is also known as a “white space skip.” As used herein, term “white space” or “blank data” refers to a print head ejecting no ink and adding no image presentation to media thereunder.
Print heads are characterized by the number of ink-dispensing nozzles, printer resolution or “dots per inch” (dpi), and the swath height. Swath height is a function of the number of nozzles and the desired resolution. More particularly, swath height equals the number of nozzles divided by the dpi resolution. The history of ink-ejecting printers includes an evolution of increasing dpi resolution to satisfy ever-increasing resolution and performance demands. Along with this evolution came a history of ever-increasing swath heights. Increasing swath heights are found throughout the printer manufacturing industry and across most printer manufacturing company model lines.
Thus, an ever-increasing swath height is expected. Unfortunately, larger swath heights introduce certain inefficiencies into the printing process. As will be appreciated, printing inefficiencies ultimately result in relatively less overall page throughput. More specifically, a larger swath height pays a greater penalty for “remainder swaths”, i.e., where only a partial swath height is needed to complete a given page. A complete print head scan is required, but a complete swath of image is not produced. This results in inefficient use of scan time, i.e., time in which the print head scans across the page.
Smaller swath heights, as in the history of such printers, did not introduce significant inefficiencies due to the relative size of swath height and vertical dimension of a given page. More particularly, previous printing heads had swath heights at only a small percentage of the total needed, i.e., small compared to page length. Hence remainder swaths did not significantly impact page throughput. For example, the above-noted swath heights of ⅙
th
inch (0.423 cm), ⅓
rd
inch (0.847 cm) and ½ inch (1.27 cm) were small in comparison to the typical 11-inch (27.94 cm) page height. Thus, a relatively large number of print head scans were required for each page because the swath height was much, much smaller than the page height.
As swath height grows, however, the need for an additional swath or print head scan represents a correspondingly more significant portion of the overall page and, therefore, the overall print time required for that page. Thus, inefficient use of print head scan time, i.e., such as resulting from printing using only a portion of swath height, represents a potential for increasing inefficiency as swath heights grow in comparison to the typical page height. Such “remainder swaths” occur when an integer multiple of the swath height mismatches page height. Thus, for example if the swath height were equal to the page height then no remainder swath issue arises. Similarly, for an integer multiple of the swath height equal to the page height no remainder swath issue arises. In other words, if an integer multiple of the swath height equals the printing area of the page, then no remainder swaths will occur, i.e., no condition occurs where only a portion of the swath height is used for printing. Unfortunately, users designate different sized media and set margins of varying dimensions. As a result, the actual printing area on a given page varies and does not equal in every case an integer multiple of the swath height. Accordingly, remainder swaths arise as a source of throughput inefficiency.
FIG. 1
(Prior Art) illustrates schematically the relative size relationship between a print head
10
having a ½ inch (1.27 cm) swath height
12
and a page
14
having an 11 inch (27.94 cm) page height
16
. To cover the entire page
14
, print head
10
must scan across page
14
at least 22 times, i.e., ½ inch (1.27 cm) vertical coverage for each scan and 22 total scans to cover 11 inches (27.94 cm). In this typical prior art configuration, each swath height
12
corresponds to 4.5% of the page height
16
. Thus, an additional scan required at the bottom of a page, but only utilizing a portion of the print head
10
swath height
12
, represents at most an inefficiency of nearly 4.5% relative to the overall page
14
.
Printer swath heights are increasing and are expected to increase significantly. As swath heights increase, greater inefficiencies will result. For example, swath heights of several inches are foreseeable. Future ink-ejecting printers will likely have even greater swath heights.
FIG. 2
(Prior Art) illustrates significant inefficiency under prior art printing methods as swath heights increase relative to typical page height. In
FIG. 2
, print head
20
enjoys, for example, a 3.4-inch (7.62 cm) swath height
22
. Page
24
has a page height
26
of 11 inches (27.94 cm). To guarantee coverage of the entire page
24
, print head
20
must scan at least four times. Thus, under the configuration illustrated in
FIG. 2
, each scan or swath height
22
represents 25% of the required page
24
printing operation. An inherent and significant inefficiency arises because the relative size of the swath height
22
and page height
26
invariably results in a certain portion of the last print head
20
scan not utilizing a full swath height
22
. Thus, for a final scan of page
24
utilizing a very small portion of the swath height
22
, a nearly 25% inefficiency in page throughput relative to scan time results.
It would be desirable, therefore, to adapt to ever-increasing swath heights while not suffering the ever-increasing page throughput inefficiencies resulting from increased swath height.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention proposes more efficient use of scan time by coordinating successive media trans

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Print on two pages concurrently does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Print on two pages concurrently, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Print on two pages concurrently will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3085747