Stock material or miscellaneous articles – All metal or with adjacent metals – Composite powder
Reexamination Certificate
2001-04-13
2004-02-10
LaVilla, Michael (Department: 1775)
Stock material or miscellaneous articles
All metal or with adjacent metals
Composite powder
C428S546000, C428S336000, C428S681000, C428S405000, C428S379000, C428S391000, C428S450000, C075S246000, C075S255000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06689485
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to separation of heavy metals, radionuclides, and halogenated hydrocarbons from aqueous media.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Heavy metals, radionuclides, and halogenated hydrocarbons constitute major contaminants in the clean-up and decontamination of aqueous waste. Virtually every site or aqueous stream that requires remediation contains contaminants from at least one of these three groups.
For example, many of the Superfund sites administered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency involve heavy metals such as lead, mercury, or chromium from factories previously occupying these sites. The U.S. Department of Energy's waste sites at Hanford, Wash., and at the Savannah River, S.C. contain vast amounts of aqueous waste with significant amounts of radionuclides such as strontium-90, cesium-137, and technetium-99 are present. Halogenated hydrocarbons such as perchlorethylene (PCE) and trichlorethylene (TCE) are common industrial solvents still in wide use today, e.g. drycleaners. These halogenated hydrocarbons are highly toxic and are likely carcinogens with safe drinking water limits of less than 10 parts per billion. An accidental spill of these chlorinated hydrocarbons could cause serious hazardous risks to municipal water supplies.
Previously, removal of these types of contaminants required very expensive treatment procedures. These procedures primarily use pump-and-treat methods wherein water was pumped out of the soil, treated, and then pumped back into the ground. In addition, expensive reagents such as ethylene diaminetraacetic acid (EDTA) or expensive materials such as ultrafilters are required for these treatments.
In the case of halogenated hydrocarbon contaminants, a recent development which has garnered strong interest is the use of iron filings or powders, or iron sulfide(pyrite), for in-situ treatment of contaminated groundwater streams. The iron (or the pyrite) has been found to degrade hydrocarbons by reductive elimination and/or reductive dehalogenation of the parent compound and its daughter products. In use, the iron (or pyrite) is placed in a trench or a well that is located perpendicular to the flow of the groundwater, with the intent of leaving the reagent permanently in place. While this method obviates the necessity for maintenance, and is much less expensive than pump-and-treat methods, the relatively low reactivity of the iron or pyrite requires large amounts of reagent to achieve complete decontamination. Thus, if iron filings were used, a large emplacement would be required, entailing large initial capital costs.
In the case of radionuclides, treatment of radionuclide contamination entails special considerations. Radionuclide contaminants invariably involve a national government, have little or no margin for losses to the environment, and must be recovered in a form suitable for handling and further processing for long-term storage.
A radionuclide that is of special concern is technetium. Technetium is an artificial, radioactive element that is a by-product of both weapons dedicated and energy generating nuclear fission plants. It presents a particular difficulty in that it commonly forms the pertechnetate anion (TcO
4
−
). It is of global concern as it is not only a contaminant at the Department of Energy's Hanford, Savannah River, and Oak Ridge sites, but is also present at the Chernobyl disaster site, and continues to be produced by fission plants throughout the world.
Technetium (Tc) removal is a high priority need. Waste separation, pretreatment, and vitrification processes for technetium removal involve separation into solid high level waste (HLW) and low level waste (LLW) fractions. The latter contains most of the Tc, predominantly in the +7 oxidation state as the pertechnetate ion (TcO
4
−
). Vitrification of these waste fractions is problematic because Tc
7+
compounds are volatile at high temperatures, and the presence of large quantities of nitrate and nitrate in the LLW ensures that the melts remain oxidizing.
Methods of extracting Tc from the aqueous media such as LLW prior to concentration and vitrification are urgently needed to address this volatility problem, as well as to reduce the total volume of vitrified waste. These needs are driven by both safety and cost considerations.
While other radionuclides such as strontium and cesium are present in low-level waste form as cations and can be sorbed onto clays and micas, or, under some conditions, precipitated with tetraphenylborate, the pertechnetate ion carries a negative charge and exhibits little or none of the usual sorptive precipitation behavior of metal ions. Thus, it is very difficult to contain and process technetium with any previously existing technology.
A need therefore exists for remediation of radionuclides, metal contaminants and halogenated hydrocarbons in groundwater. A particular need exists for remediation of radionuclides such as technetium and heavy metals such as such as chromium, lead, mercury and titanium in groundwater.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3661556 (1972-05-01), Jolley et al.
patent: 3869521 (1975-03-01), Benson
patent: 3891976 (1975-06-01), Carlsen
patent: 4354960 (1982-10-01), Hammer et al.
patent: 4475946 (1984-10-01), Matsufuji et al.
patent: 4511454 (1985-04-01), Bonny
patent: 4680140 (1987-07-01), Kageyama
patent: 4891349 (1990-01-01), Bowman
patent: 5013453 (1991-05-01), Walker
patent: 5067781 (1991-11-01), Montanari et al.
patent: 5168091 (1992-12-01), Behrmann et al.
patent: 5246591 (1993-09-01), Abolt et al.
patent: 5352485 (1994-10-01), DeGuire et al.
patent: 5362394 (1994-11-01), Blowes et al.
patent: 5362402 (1994-11-01), Haitko et al.
patent: 5372717 (1994-12-01), Abolt et al.
patent: 5380441 (1995-01-01), Thornton
patent: 5431825 (1995-07-01), Diel
patent: 5441648 (1995-08-01), Lidzey
patent: 5453206 (1995-09-01), Browne
patent: 5462670 (1995-10-01), Guess
patent: 5472618 (1995-12-01), Bolser
patent: 5545331 (1996-08-01), Guess
patent: 5610116 (1997-03-01), Werdecker et al.
patent: 5616532 (1997-04-01), Heller et al.
patent: 5776360 (1998-07-01), Sieber
patent: 5792875 (1998-08-01), Chaudhari et al.
patent: 5874019 (1999-02-01), Uchida et al.
patent: 5916539 (1999-06-01), Pilgrimm
patent: 5994604 (1999-11-01), Reagen
patent: 6017667 (2000-01-01), Hakata
patent: 6183658 (2001-02-01), Lesniak et al.
patent: 6242663 (2001-06-01), Ponder et al.
patent: 90/012595 (1990-02-01), None
Blowes et al., Environmental Science and Technology, 12, 1977, pp. 3348-3357 (no month).
Pratt et al., Environmental Science and Technology, 9, 1997 pp. 2492-2498 (no month).
Deng et al., Environmental Science and Technology, No. 15, 1999, pp. 2651-2656 (no month).
Gu et al., Environmental Science and Technology, 1994, pp. 38-46 (no month).
Jardine et al., Environmental Science and Technology, 1999, 33, 2939-2944 (no month).
Boronina et al., Environmental Science and Technology, 1995, 29, 1511-1517 (no month).
Burris et al., Environmental Science and Technology, 1995, 29, 2850-2855 (no month).
Criddle et al., Environmental Science and Technology, 1991, 25, 973-978 (no month).
Hardy et al., Environmental Science and Technology, 1996, 30, 57-65 (no month).
Johnson et al., Environmental Science and Technology, 1996, 30, 2634-2640 (no month).
Devlin et al., Environmental Science and Technology, 1998, 32, 1941-1947 (no month).
Matheson et al., Environmental Science and Technology, 1994, 28, 2045-2053 (no month).
Morris et al., Science, Apr. 23, 1999, pp. 622-624.
Roberts et al., Environmental Science and Technology, 1991, 25, 76-86 (no month).
Roberts et al., Environmental Science and Technology, 30, 8, 1996, 2654-2659 (no month).
Seaman et al., Environmental Science and Technology, 1999, 33, 938-944 (no month).
Singh et al., Environmental Science and Technology, 1999, 33, 1488-1494 (no month).
Wang et al., Environmental Science and Technology, 31, 7, 1997, 2154-2156 (no month).
Wonterghem et al, Nature, 14, Aug. 1986, pp. 622-623.
Ryan et al, MRS Bulletin, Jul. 1999, pp. 29-35.
Moulijn et al, Catalys
Mallouk Thomas F.
Ponder Sherman M.
LaVilla Michael
Law Offices of John A. Parrish
The Penn State Research Foundation
LandOfFree
Powerful reductant for decontamination of groundwater and... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Powerful reductant for decontamination of groundwater and..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Powerful reductant for decontamination of groundwater and... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3347433