Positive locking mechanism for a wheel-activated vehicle...

Details Positive locking mechanism for a wheel-activated vehicle... Positive locking mechanism for a wheel-activated vehicle...

2001-07-05

2004-08-10

Ridley, Richard W. (Department: 3651)

Material or article handling

Load-transporting type vehicle and external means...

Means serves to align wheeled vehicle and load receiving or...

C414S396000, C414S584000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06773221

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The subject invention generally pertains to a system for restraining a vehicle at a loading dock, and more specifically to a vehicle restraint that is wheel-actuated.
2. Description of Related Art
In the loading and unloading of vehicles at a loading dock, heavy equipment such as forklifts pass into and out of the vehicle to facilitate and expedite the unloading and/or loading of the vehicle. Accordingly, it is important that the vehicle remain generally fixed relative to the loading dock to avoid accidents and to protect the safety of dock personnel. Otherwise, there is a potential hazard for the vehicle to inadvertently move away from the loading dock during the loading/unloading operation. If this were to occur without the knowledge of the dock personnel, they could continue to attempt to move cargo into or out of the vehicle while assuming the vehicle is secured at the dock. Thus, injury to personnel or damage to dock equipment could occur.
A common method of restraining a vehicle at a loading dock involves manually wedging wheel chocks in front of a vehicle's wheels. The use of wheel chocks, however, have several drawbacks: 1) the blocks are easily lost or damaged; 2) the blocks may not operate effectively due to a slippery road surface from oil, grit, rain, ice, or snow; 3) wheel chocks are awkward to handle and sometimes difficult to remove from the wedged position; 4) vehicles have been known to drive over wheel chocks; and 5) manually reaching underneath a vehicle (to insert or remove chocks) is inherently hazardous.
Given the potential hazards of such manual placement of wheel chocks, automated chocking systems have been employed. While such systems are safer and more convenient than manual positioning of chocks, they may have their own disadvantages. For example, such systems may not be suitable for some vehicles, because the vehicle's undercarriage, tailgate lifts, mud flaps or adjacent tires, may interfere with the movement of the chock as the chock attempts to engage the wheel. In addition, automated chocking systems may not be adjustable to accommodate the large range of tire sizes on cargo vehicles. Such systems may also be awkward, difficult and time consuming to engage and disengage from the vehicle parked at the dock.
To overcome the disadvantages of these earlier automated chocking devices, improved automated chocking systems are disclosed in U. S. Pat. Nos. 5,762,459 and 5,582,498 and in co-pending application Ser. No. 09/477,264; all of which are expressly incorporated by reference herein. The disclosure of the present invention provides further improvements and enhancements to the designs of the incorporated references.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In some embodiments, a vehicle restraint includes a latching member that engages an inverted gear rack whose gear teeth point downward to prevent dirt and ice from accumulating between the gear teeth.
In some embodiments, a vehicle restraint includes an upper rail with a contoured leading edge for smoothly guiding a wheel-blocking barrier from a stored position to an elevated wheel-chocking position.
In some embodiments, a wheel support helps prevent a low hanging mud flap from getting pinched between a trigger assembly of the vehicle restraint and the vehicle's wheel.
In some embodiments, a tooth alignment device helps align the teeth of a latching member to that of a gear rack.
In some embodiments, the tooth alignment device includes a movable alignment tooth that is offset relative to the pitch spacing of other teeth.
In some embodiments, the alignment tooth is spring loaded to protrude beyond adjacent teeth.
In some embodiments, the components of a vehicle restraint are arranged to avoid developing on the vehicle restraint's frame a bending moment that may otherwise exist as a latching member engages a gear rack.


REFERENCES:
patent: 1102773 (1914-07-01), Martin
patent: 2413744 (1947-01-01), Carter
patent: 2773564 (1956-12-01), Garard
patent: 3110466 (1963-11-01), O'Sullivan
patent: 3221907 (1965-12-01), O'Sullivan
patent: 3305049 (1967-02-01), Willey
patent: 3447639 (1969-06-01), Parr
patent: 3542157 (1970-11-01), Noah
patent: 3666118 (1972-05-01), Raynes et al.
patent: 3667160 (1972-06-01), Salloum
patent: 4013145 (1977-03-01), Mumm
patent: 4024820 (1977-05-01), Hlinsky et al.
patent: 4122629 (1978-10-01), Rennick
patent: 4146888 (1979-03-01), Grunewald et al.
patent: 4191503 (1980-03-01), Neff et al.
patent: 4207019 (1980-06-01), Cone
patent: 4208161 (1980-06-01), Hipp et al.
patent: 4216724 (1980-08-01), Grillet
patent: 4264259 (1981-04-01), Hipp
patent: 4267748 (1981-05-01), Grunewald et al.
patent: 4282621 (1981-08-01), Anthony et al.
patent: 4373847 (1983-02-01), Hipp et al.
patent: 4379354 (1983-04-01), Hahn et al.
patent: 4443150 (1984-04-01), Hahn et al.
patent: 4472099 (1984-09-01), Hahn et al.
patent: 4560315 (1985-12-01), Hahn
patent: 4572080 (1986-02-01), Williams et al.
patent: 4605353 (1986-08-01), Hahn et al.
patent: 4634334 (1987-01-01), Hahn et al.
patent: 4653967 (1987-03-01), Isaksson et al.
patent: 4674941 (1987-06-01), Hageman
patent: 4676344 (1987-06-01), Locicero
patent: 4695216 (1987-09-01), Erlandsson
patent: 4728242 (1988-03-01), Erlandsson
patent: 4759678 (1988-07-01), Hageman
patent: 4765792 (1988-08-01), Cherry et al.
patent: 4767254 (1988-08-01), Kovach et al.
patent: 4784567 (1988-11-01), Hageman et al.
patent: 4815918 (1989-03-01), Bennett et al.
patent: RE32968 (1989-06-01), Hahn
patent: 4861217 (1989-08-01), Erlandsson
patent: 4865508 (1989-09-01), Carlson
patent: RE33154 (1990-01-01), Hahn et al.
patent: 4915568 (1990-04-01), West
patent: RE33242 (1990-06-01), Hipp et al.
patent: 4938647 (1990-07-01), Erlandsson
patent: 4963068 (1990-10-01), Gelder
patent: 4969792 (1990-11-01), Ellis et al.
patent: 4973213 (1990-11-01), Erlandsson
patent: 5096021 (1992-03-01), Tart
patent: 5249905 (1993-10-01), Warner et al.
patent: 5375965 (1994-12-01), Springer et al.
patent: 5375968 (1994-12-01), Kollitz et al.
patent: 5531557 (1996-07-01), Springer
patent: 5553987 (1996-09-01), Ellis
patent: 5582498 (1996-12-01), Springer et al.
patent: 5664930 (1997-09-01), Ellis
patent: 5709518 (1998-01-01), Alexander et al.
patent: 5762459 (1998-06-01), Springer et al.
patent: 6092970 (2000-07-01), Hahn et al.
patent: 6238163 (2001-05-01), Springer et al.
patent: RE37570 (2002-03-01), Springer et al.
patent: 6368043 (2002-04-01), Leum et al.
patent: 6505713 (2003-01-01), Paul et al.
patent: 6524053 (2003-02-01), Hahn et al.
patent: 2001/0026751 (2001-10-01), Berends
patent: 1308222 (1992-10-01), None
patent: 583 404 (1933-08-01), None
patent: 27 35 826 (1979-02-01), None
patent: 3830891 (1990-03-01), None
patent: 42 42 415 (1994-02-01), None
patent: 0 384 850 (1990-08-01), None
patent: 0 302 356 (1991-03-01), None
patent: 0 537 075 (1993-04-01), None
patent: 0 580 415 (1994-01-01), None
patent: 0 609 049 (1994-08-01), None
patent: 0 639 488 (1995-02-01), None
patent: 0 784 588 (1997-07-01), None
patent: 0 868 376 (1998-10-01), None
patent: 0 905 066 (1999-03-01), None
patent: 0 919 496 (1999-06-01), None
patent: 1 190 969 (2002-03-01), None
patent: 2 284 481 (1976-04-01), None
patent: 2 394 423 (1979-01-01), None
patent: 2 652 340 (1991-03-01), None
patent: 2 672 578 (1992-08-01), None
patent: 2 682 343 (1993-04-01), None
patent: 2 689 845 (1993-10-01), None
patent: 526008 (1955-05-01), None
patent: 60-36230 (1985-02-01), None
patent: 157253 (1978-07-01), None
patent: 1036593 (1983-08-01), None
patent: WO 95/18029 (1995-07-01), None
patent: WO 95/24353 (1995-09-01), None
patent: WO 96/12665 (1996-05-01), None
patent: WO 97/19875 (1997-06-01), None
patent: WO 02/16238 (2002-02-01), None
Photographs (5) of Combar wheel-restraint product; taken prior to Nov. 1991; 2 pages.
Brochure of Combar Product (in Dutch); Haagh Protection; circa 1991; 4 pages.
Brochure Wheelblocker by Dyna Seal with translation; Dyna Seal B.V.; circa 1993; 8 pages (4 pages Dutch with 4 page English translation).
Photographs (7) of Kelley Auto-Cho

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Positive locking mechanism for a wheel-activated vehicle... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Positive locking mechanism for a wheel-activated vehicle..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Positive locking mechanism for a wheel-activated vehicle... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3278651