Pollution control device

Details Pollution control device Pollution control device

2000-10-23

2002-08-13

Mayekar, Kishor (Department: 1741)

Chemistry: electrical and wave energy

Processes and products

Electrostatic field or electrical discharge

C204S177000, C588S253000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06432280

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to pollution control apparatuses and methods for reducing contaminants in an effluent gas flow, and more particularly to pollution control devices utilizing non-thermal plasma reactors.
DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART
Today's industrial processes create enormous amounts of pollutants. Many of these sources release gases containing these pollutants into the environment. Examples of these sources include factories, combustion engines, dump sites, land fills, sewage treatment plants and lagoons and waste heaps, to name a few. The primary air pollutants in these gases include NO, NO
2
, SO
2
, CO
2
, and hydrocarbons.
Several devices and methods for removing pollutants from these gases have developed. These devices utilize mechanical, electrical, electrochemical, and chemical processes. Typical examples include filters, aqueous scrubbers, electrostatic precipitators, and catalytic converters.
Some existing electrical and electrochemical pollution control devices and methods operate on the theory that through dissociation, toxic and hazardous oxides can be separated from an effluent gas through ionization and non-thermal plasma fields. One such pollution control device is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,366,701 issued to Taylor et al. on Nov. 22, 1994, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Taylor describes an apparatus where an effluent gas is ionized in a resonance field and then passed through a continuous electric arc to potentialize the gas. The treated effluent gas is then released into the environment at temperatures ranging from 100° F. to 250° F. where ultraviolet light and the solar spectrum ideally energize the gas into inert non-toxic gases. Unfortunately, processes such as the one disclosed in Taylor do not complete the processing of dissociated contaminants, such as dissociated oxides. Although the temperature of the released effluent gas is lower than the temperature of the effluent gas entering the apparatus, the release temperature of the gas is still elevated. Therefore, the gas is still in an excited state and re-association of excited radical oxides is prevalent, for example, thereby allowing the formation of harmful pollutants that include aerosol chains that lead to greenhouse gases and acid rain.
Still further, some pollution control devices utilize non-thermal plasma reactors that expose an electrode, such as a corona wire, to the contaminants in the effluent gas to be treated. Contaminants accumulate on the electrode and reduce the efficiency of the device. The electrode eventually must be replaced.
Therefore, there remains a need to process effluent gases in a manner that substantially reduces the re-association of dissociated components of an effluent gas into harmful pollutants, particularly as environmental regulations become increasingly more stringent. Also, there remains a need for a pollution control device which allows for recapture of commercially valuable products. Further, there remains a need for a new non-thermal plasma reactor that efficiently processes contaminants in an effluent gas without exposing the electrode to harmful contaminants.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A pollution control device for reducing contaminants in an effluent gas includes a resonance chamber in gaseous communication with a source of the effluent gas. The resonance chamber ionizes the effluent gas. An output non-thermal plasma reactor is in gaseous communication with an output of the resonance chamber and destroys at least a portion of the contaminants in the effluent gas. The pollution control device also includes an output cooling unit in gaseous communication with an output of the output non-thermal plasma reactor. The output cooling unit is adapted to cool the effluent gas to a non-excited state, whereby re-association of oxides in the effluent gas is substantially reduced.
The pollution control device provides several benefits over existing pollution control devices. For example, the processed effluent gas is placed in a steady state prior to either release into the environment or re-injection into the source of the effluent gas. It is believed that the steady state effluent gas tends to associate into near perfect molecules rather than re-associate into harmful pollutants, thereby preventing the formation of harmful pollutants that include aerosol chains that lead to greenhouse gases and acid rain. Also, the cooling of the effluent gas may cause the effluent gas to reach several dew points within the pollution control device. These dew points allow for the recovery of commercially significant compounds, such as sulfates, sulfites, nitrates, and nitrites.
The above and other features of the present invention will be better understood from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention that is provided in connection with the accompanying drawings.


REFERENCES:
patent: 2382253 (1945-08-01), Penney et al.
patent: 2962265 (1960-11-01), Van Luik, Jr.
patent: 3444061 (1969-05-01), Hellund
patent: 3674666 (1972-07-01), Foster et al.
patent: 3706182 (1972-12-01), Sargent
patent: 3739554 (1973-06-01), Whetten et al.
patent: 3745751 (1973-07-01), Zey et al.
patent: 3844741 (1974-10-01), Dimitrik
patent: 3846637 (1974-11-01), Gettinger
patent: 3856476 (1974-12-01), De Seversky
patent: 3869362 (1975-03-01), Machi et al.
patent: 3907520 (1975-09-01), Huang et al.
patent: 3981815 (1976-09-01), Taniguchi et al.
patent: 4077888 (1978-03-01), Rhoades et al.
patent: 4077889 (1978-03-01), Rhoades et al.
patent: 4175016 (1979-11-01), Lewis et al.
patent: 4181704 (1980-01-01), Sheer et al.
patent: 4319891 (1982-03-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 4351810 (1982-09-01), Martinez et al.
patent: 4367130 (1983-01-01), Lemelson
patent: 4376637 (1983-03-01), Yang
patent: 4378976 (1983-04-01), Rush
patent: B13869362 (1984-05-01), Machi et al.
patent: 4474621 (1984-10-01), Saccocio et al.
patent: 4540554 (1985-09-01), Dayen
patent: 4582004 (1986-04-01), Fey et al.
patent: 4644877 (1987-02-01), Barton et al.
patent: 4650555 (1987-03-01), Rzad et al.
patent: 4657738 (1987-04-01), Kanter et al.
patent: 4695448 (1987-09-01), Anthony
patent: 4885139 (1989-12-01), Sparks et al.
patent: 4925639 (1990-05-01), Stauffer
patent: 4933060 (1990-06-01), Prohaska et al.
patent: 5087428 (1992-02-01), Fletcher et al.
patent: 5134946 (1992-08-01), Poovey
patent: 5137546 (1992-08-01), Steinbacher et al.
patent: 5147516 (1992-09-01), Mathur et al.
patent: 5198201 (1993-03-01), Johnson
patent: 5284556 (1994-02-01), Rich
patent: 5324492 (1994-06-01), Masuda et al.
patent: 5366701 (1994-11-01), Taylor et al.
patent: 5458748 (1995-10-01), Breault et al.
patent: 5512144 (1996-04-01), Stauffer
patent: 5601791 (1997-02-01), Plaks et al.
patent: 5695616 (1997-12-01), Helfritch et al.
patent: 5711147 (1998-01-01), Vogtlin et al.
patent: 5733360 (1998-03-01), Feldman et al.
patent: 5746984 (1998-05-01), Hoard
patent: 5753087 (1998-05-01), Wang et al.
patent: 5807466 (1998-09-01), Wang et al.
patent: 5836154 (1998-11-01), Williamson et al.
patent: 5843288 (1998-12-01), Yamamoto
patent: 5855855 (1999-01-01), Williamson et al.
patent: 5871703 (1999-02-01), Alix et al.
patent: 5872426 (1999-02-01), Kunhardt et al.
patent: 5904905 (1999-05-01), Dolezal et al.
patent: 5906715 (1999-05-01), Williamson et al.
patent: 6007682 (1999-12-01), Hancock et al.
patent: 6030506 (2000-02-01), Bittenson et al.
patent: 6038853 (2000-03-01), Penetrante et al.
patent: 6132692 (2000-10-01), Alix et al.
patent: 6136158 (2000-10-01), Wang et al.
patent: 6139694 (2000-10-01), Rogers et al.
patent: 6146599 (2000-11-01), Ruan et al.
patent: 6190507 (2001-02-01), Whealton et al.
patent: 6264899 (2001-07-01), Caren et al.
Jun. 26, 2000 Seminar, “Advanced Oxidation Technologies Fundamental and Environmental Applications”, Science & Technology Integration, Inc., pp. 29-43.
Urabe, T., et al. “Experimental Studies on Mercury Vapor Removal by Corona Discharge . . . ”, Chemical Abs., vol. 109, #236097, Oct. 1987.
Dhali, S.K., et al. “Dielectric-barrier

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Pollution control device does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Pollution control device, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Pollution control device will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2919452