Optical: systems and elements – Deflection using a moving element – Using a periodically moving element
Reexamination Certificate
1999-01-14
2003-05-06
Pascal, Leslie (Department: 2633)
Optical: systems and elements
Deflection using a moving element
Using a periodically moving element
C359S199200, C359S199200, C359S199200, C359S199200, C359S199200, C359S199200, C359S199200
Reexamination Certificate
active
06559991
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
When nominally circularly symmetric optical fibre is employed as a long distance transmission path from an optical transmitter to an optical receiver, the departures from perfect circular symmetry of that fibre can be of a sufficient magnitude for the fibre to function as a concatenation of birefringent elements of random relative orientation. Moreover that orientation is liable to change with time.
When polarised light of any particular wavelength is transmitted through a single element exhibiting uniform birefringence, that light is, in general, resolved into two components (modes) propagating with two specific different velocities, and so possessing different transit times of propagation through that element. For each of two particular orthogonal states of polarisation (SOPs), known as the principal SOPs, the light is not resolved into different components, but propagates at a single velocity with a single transit time, i.e. propagates as a single (polarisation) mode. These principal SOPs are aligned with the principal axes of birefringence of the element. For light launched into the element with either one of these two principal SOPs, the SOP of the light remains unchanged in its passage through the element. For light launched into the element with any other SOP, that light is resolved in its passage through the element into two orthogonal components aligned with the principal axes of the element and propagating with different velocities. As the result in the velocity difference, the relative phase of the two components at the far end of the element is generally not the same as that at the launch (input) end, and so the light emerging at the far end generally emerges with an SOP that is different from that with which it entered the element. This characteristic can be conceptualised as the SOP of the light evolving in a cyclic manner in its passage through the element.
When polarised light is transmitted through a concatenation of elements, each exhibiting uniform birefringence, but whose principal axes are not all co-aligned, then, even if that light is not resolved into two components by the first element of the concatenation, it will be so resolved by a later element. Then each of those two elements will itself be resolved into two further components by an element further along the concatenation, and so on. It can be demonstrated that for any such concatenation there exists a specific pair of orthogonal SOPs having the property that light launched with either SOP into the concatenation propagates through it with a single transit time. The transit is faster for one of the SOPs than for the other, and the difference in transit time, the differential group delay (DGD), is a measure of the first order polarisation mode dispersion (PMD) of the concatenation. (The term first order PMD is employed in this specification to denote the DGD in respect of a particular wavelength, thereby excluding from its ambit consideration of second order PMD effects which describe the wavelength dependence of that DGD.) For neither one of this specific pair of orthogonal SOPs is the launch SOP maintained in the passage of the light through the concatenation, and the light emerges at the far end with an SOP that is in general different from that with which it was launched. The emergent SOP for one of the single transit time launch SOPs is orthogonal to the emergent SOP for the other single transit time launch SOP. For any launch SOP that is not one of the single transit time launch SOPs, the emergent light is composed of two components (polarisation modes), generally of unequal amplitude, which have propagated through the concatenation with different transit times, respectively the previously mentioned fast and slow single transit times of the concatenation.
By analogy with the single uniform birefringence element situation, the two single transit time launch SOPs for the concatenation are often referred to as the principal SOPs of the concatenation. Having regard to the fact that for such a concatenation the single transit time input (launch) SOPs are, in general, different from the corresponding output (emergence) SOPs, reference in this specification will be made to input principal SOPs (IPSPs) and to output principal SOPs (OPSPs). From consideration of principles of reciprocity, it will be evident that the IPSPs for one direction of propagation through the concatenation are the OPSPs for the other, and vice versa.
The presence of first order polarisation mode dispersion (PMD) in a transmission path—the difference between the fast and slow single transit times (DGD)—is liable to be a problem when its magnitude becomes significant compared with the bit period of traffic propagating in the transmission path. Under these circumstances there will be significant pulse broadening at the receiver when bits are launched into the transmission path with an SOP that the transmission path divides into fast and slow single transit time components (modes) of equal power. In principle, this pulse broadening effect could be avoided by taking steps to ensure that the bits are always launched into the transmission path with SOPs matched with one of the IPSPs of the transmission path so that they always propagate, either exclusively with the fast transit time, or exclusively with the slow one, i.e. so that they always propagate in a single mode. However there are difficulties with achieving this in practice. The primary reason for this is that the IPSPs vary with time, and so an active SOP alignment system would be required. Additionally, identification of the IPSPs typically requires access to both ends of the transmission path, and so the active SOP alignment system situated at the transmitter end of the transmission path would require a feedback control signal from the receiver end of that transmission path.
An alternative approach to the avoidance of the problems presented by first order PMD is a compensation approach that involves allowing the bits to be launched into the transmission path with an SOP that the transmission path divides into two components (modes) propagating with different (fast and slow) transit times, and providing an active system at the receiver end which separates the two components, subjects the separated components to controlled variable differential delay to restore synchronisation of the components, and then recombines them.
An example of the PMD compensation approach is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,659,412. At the receiver, the signal received from the transmitter via the transmission path is fed to a polarisation beam splitter via a polarisation state controller The outputs of the polarisation beam splitter are fed to separate detectors provided with associated clock extraction circuits, and the phase relationship between the two extracted clock signals is determined. The resulting phase difference signal is used to control the polarisation state controller in such a way as to maximise the phase difference. This phase difference is at a maximum when the polarisation state controller is operative to map the OPSPs of the transmission path on to the principal polarisation states of the polarisation beam splitter, and under these conditions the polarisation beam splitter is operative to separate the component of the signal launched into the transmission path that propagates through it with the ‘fast’ transit time from the component that propagates through it with the ‘slow’ transit time. In one of the embodiments specifically described, the electrical output of the detector providing the phase-leading clock signal is delayed by the amount corresponding to the measured phase difference between the two extracted clock signals, the DGD, and then the two electrical signals are combined. In the other embodiment specifically described, the two detectors receive only a tapped fraction of the total optical power outputs from the polarisation beam splitter, while the remainder of that power, after the imposition of an optical delay upon the leading component, is o
Epworth Richard Edward
Farley Kevin Stuart
Watley Daniel
Barnes & Thornburg
Nortel Networks Limited
Pascal Leslie
Payne David C.
LandOfFree
Polarization mode dispersion compensation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Polarization mode dispersion compensation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Polarization mode dispersion compensation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3054391