Plants which synthesize a modified starch, process for the...

Multicellular living organisms and unmodified parts thereof and – Method of introducing a polynucleotide molecule into or... – The polynucleotide alters carbohydrate production in the plant

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C800S285000, C800S278000, C800S317200, C435S320100, C435S468000, C435S417000, C536S023100, C536S023600, C536S024500, C426S438000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07569744

ABSTRACT:
Nucleic acid molecules are described encoding a starch granule-bound protein as well as methods and recombinant DNA molecules for the production of transgenic plant cells and plants synthesizing a modified starch with modified viscosity properties and a modified phosphate content. Moreover, the plant cells and plants resulting from those methods as well as the starch obtainable therefrom are described.

REFERENCES:
patent: 3887752 (1975-06-01), Elizer
patent: 4608265 (1986-08-01), Zwiercan et al.
patent: 5281276 (1994-01-01), Chiu et al.
patent: 5344663 (1994-09-01), Jewell et al.
patent: 5349123 (1994-09-01), Shewmaker et al.
patent: 5585479 (1996-12-01), Hoke et al.
patent: 5783638 (1998-07-01), Lai et al.
patent: 6013861 (2000-01-01), Bird et al.
patent: 6103893 (2000-08-01), Cooke et al.
patent: 6207880 (2001-03-01), Kossmann et al.
patent: 6825342 (2004-11-01), Cooke et al.
patent: 2007/0067874 (2007-03-01), Kossmann et al.
patent: 688006 (1998-03-01), None
patent: 0 368 506 (1990-05-01), None
patent: 06-261797 (1994-09-01), None
patent: WO 90/12084 (1990-10-01), None
patent: WO 92/11375 (1992-07-01), None
patent: WO 92/11382 (1992-07-01), None
patent: WO 92/14827 (1992-09-01), None
patent: WO 94/09144 (1994-04-01), None
patent: WO 94/24292 (1994-10-01), None
patent: WO 95/07355 (1995-03-01), None
patent: WO 95/26407 (1995-10-01), None
patent: WO 96/08261 (1996-03-01), None
patent: WO 96/19581 (1996-06-01), None
patent: WO 96/27674 (1996-09-01), None
patent: WO 96/34968 (1996-11-01), None
patent: WO 97/11188 (1997-03-01), None
patent: WO 97/20040 (1997-06-01), None
Patron et al Plant Physiology 2002, 130: 190-198.
Edwards et al The Plant Cell 2002, 14: 1767-1785.
S. Schittenhelm, et al., “Stärke- und Amylosegehalt Sowle Gröβe und Morphologie der Stärkekörner von Knollentragenden Solanum-Arten”, Landbauforschung Völkenrode, vol. 42, No. 3, 1992, pp. 117-126.
J. Hovenkamp-Hermelink, et al., “Rapid Estimation of the Amylose/Amylopectin Ratio in Small Amounts of Tuber and Leaf Tissue of the Potato”, Potato Research, vol. 31, 1988, pp. 241-246.
W. Morrison, et al., “An Improved Colorimetric Procedure for Determining Apparent and Total Amylose in Cereal and Other Starches”, Journal of Cereal Science, vol. 1, 1983, pp. 9-20.
D. Konecki et al., “The Primary Structure of Human Chromogranin A and Pancreastatin”, J. Biol. Chem., vol. 262, No. 35, 1987, pp. 17026-17030.
C. Napoli et al., “Introduction of a Chimeric Chalcone Synthase Gene into Petunia Results in Reversible Co-Suppression of Homologous Genes in trans”, Plant Cell, vol. 2, 1990, pp. 279-289.
Newman et al., “Genes Galore: A Summary of Methods for Accessing Results from Large-scale Partial Sequencing of AnonymousArabidopsiscDNA Clones”, Plant Physiol., vol. 106, 1994, pp. 1241-1255.
Sonnewald et al., “A Second L-Type Isozyme of Potato Glucan Phosphorylase: Cloning, Antisense Inhibition and Expression Analysis”, Plant Molec. Biol., vol. 27, No. 3, 1995, pp. 567-576.
St.-Pierre et al., “The Starch Phosphorylase Gene is Subjected to Different Modes of Regulation in Starch-Containing Tissues of Potato”, Plant Molec. Biol., vol. 30, No. 6, 1996, pp. 1087-1098.
C. Krisman, et al., “Branching Enzyme Assay: Selective Quantitation of the α1,6-Linked Glucosyl Residues Involved in the Branching Points”, Analytical Biochemistry, 147, 1985, pp. 491-196.
S. Jobling, et al., “A Minor Form of Starch Branching Enzyme in Potato (Solanum TuberosumL.) Tubers Has A Major Effect On Starch Structure: Cloning and Characterisation of Multiple Forms of SBE A”, The Plant Journal, vol. 18, No. 2, 1999, pp. 163-171.
Y. Takeda, et al., “Brancing of Amylose By The Branching Isoenzymes of Maize Endosperm”, Carbohydrate Research, 240, 1993, pp. 253-263.
G. Evans, et al., “The Effects of Ribozymes on Gene Expression in Plants”, Biochemical Society Transaction, 1992, vol. 20, pp. 344S.
J. Kossmann, et al., “Transgenic Plants as a Tool to Understand Starch Biosynthesis”, Carbohydrate Bioengineering, 1995, vol. 10, pp. 271-278.
B. Kull, et al., “Genetic Engineering of Potato Starch Composition: Inhibition of Amylose Biosynthesis in Tubers from Transgenic Potato Lines by the Expression of Antisense Sequences of the Gene for Granule-Bound Starch Synthesis”, J. Genet & Breed, 1995, vol. 49, pp. 69-76.
L. Mazzolini et al., “Assaying Synthetic Ribozymes in Plants: High-Level Expression of a Functional Hammerhead Structure Fails to Inhibit Target Gene Activity in Transiently Transformed Protoplasts”, Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 20, 1992, pp. 715-731.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/583,077, filed Oct. 19, 2006, Kossman et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/583,839, filed Oct. 20, 2006, Kossman et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/271,255, filed Nov. 14, 2008, Kossman et al.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Plants which synthesize a modified starch, process for the... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Plants which synthesize a modified starch, process for the..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Plants which synthesize a modified starch, process for the... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4076312

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.