Pixel cross talk suppression in digital microprinters

Incremental printing of symbolic information – Light or beam marking apparatus or processes – Scan of light

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C347S255000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06489984

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates generally to digital microprinters and more specifically to digital microprinters such as maskless projection lithography systems that use spatial light modulators (SLMs) for optical pattern generation (Refs. 1-6).
Such microprinters can be adversely affected by pixel cross talk resulting from coherent interactions between adjacent pixels. Such interactions could be mitigated by spacing the SLM pixels sufficiently far apart that there is no significant overlap between adjacent pixels' point spread functions at the image plane. Or alternatively, pixel exposures could be sequenced so that adjacent pixels are never on at the same time. However, these approaches can result in very low optical efficiency because illumination energy that intercepts the SLM between pixels, or on pixels that are in their off state, is wasted. Printing speed is limited by optical efficiency, so it would be desirable to use closely spaced pixels and to allow adjacent pixels to be simultaneously on in order to optimize efficiency.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention provides an optical technique for mitigating pixel cross talk resulting from coherent interactions between adjacent pixels in a digital microprinter. No loss in optical efficiency or printing speed is incurred.
The invention is applicable to a printer system that uses a spatial light modulator (SLM) for image generation. The SLM comprises an array of source pixel elements, each of which is digitally controlled to modulate illuminating radiation intercepting the pixel. Either a transmission-type or reflection-type of SLM can be used. A projection system conveys the modulated radiation to a printing surface wherein each source pixel generates a corresponding modulated exposure field that exposes the surface. (In some embodiments the SLM may be imaged directly onto the printing surface. Alternatively, the SLM may be imaged onto an intermediate image plane proximate to a microlens array, wherein each microlens condenses the illumination from a corresponding source pixel onto a focal point on the printing surface.) Due to the projection system's limited optical resolution, adjacent pixels' exposure fields may overlap, resulting in pixel cross talk effects due to coherent interaction between the overlapping fields.
The coherent effects are significantly mitigated by configuring the SLM to induce an optical phase shift on alternate pixels, wherein the phase shift induces a phase offset of approximately &pgr;/2 between adjacent pixels' exposure fields. (Typically, the phase shift would be exactly &pgr;/2 at a specific wavelength within the illumination's spectral band.) If the exposure fields (without the phase shift) have a uniform phase distribution across the printing surface, this technique can substantially eliminate the coherent interaction between adjacent pixels. If the phase distribution is not uniform, an alternative technique can be employed in which two exposures are made, with the positional relationship between the SLM and printing surface altered between exposures so that the induced phase offset is sign-inverted.
A further understanding of the nature and advantages of the present invention may be realized by reference to the remaining portions of the specification and the drawings.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4848879 (1989-07-01), Nishimura et al.
patent: 4954789 (1990-09-01), Sampsell, Jeffrey B.
patent: 5221989 (1993-06-01), Stappaerts et al.
patent: 5225920 (1993-07-01), Kasazumi et al.
patent: 5539568 (1996-07-01), Lin et al.
patent: 5691541 (1997-11-01), Ceglio et al.
patent: 5870176 (1999-02-01), Sweatt et al.
patent: 5914802 (1999-06-01), Stappaerts et al.
patent: 5930433 (1999-07-01), Williamson et al.
patent: 5949503 (1999-09-01), Koyama et al.
patent: 6031643 (2000-02-01), Burr
patent: WO 97/05526 (1997-02-01), None
patent: WO 97/34171 (1997-09-01), None
patent: WO 98/04950 (1998-02-01), None
patent: WO 99/00706 (1999-01-01), None
Choksi et al., “Maskless extreme ultraviolet lithography,”J. Vac. Sci. Technol.B 17(6), Nov./Dec. 1999, pp. 3047-3051.
Folta, J.A. et al., “High density arrays of micromirrors,” Feb. 1999, pp. 1-9 (UCRL-ID-133164/National Technical Information Service,US Dept. of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161).

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Pixel cross talk suppression in digital microprinters does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Pixel cross talk suppression in digital microprinters, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Pixel cross talk suppression in digital microprinters will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2937307

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.