Phonetic fragment search in speech data

Data processing: speech signal processing – linguistics – language – Speech signal processing – Recognition

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C704S235000, C704S255000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07401019

ABSTRACT:
A method of searching audio data is provided including receiving a query defining multiple phonetic possibilities. The method also includes comparing the query with a lattice of phonetic hypotheses associated with the audio data to identify if at least one of the multiple phonetic possibilities is approximated by at least one phonetic hypothesis in the lattice of phonetic hypotheses.

REFERENCES:
patent: 6073095 (2000-06-01), Dharanipragada et al.
patent: 6377927 (2002-04-01), Loghmani et al.
patent: 6697796 (2004-02-01), Kermani
patent: 6990448 (2006-01-01), Charlesworth et al.
patent: 7212968 (2007-05-01), Garner et al.
patent: 2003/0009331 (2003-01-01), Schalkwyk et al.
James et al, “A Fast Lattice-Based Approach to Vocabulary Independent Wordspotting”, Proc. ICASSP, Adelaide, 1994.
J. Garofolo, “TREC-9 Spoken Document Retrieval Track” National Institute of Standards and Technology, http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec9.
Logan et al., “An experimental study of an audio indexing system for the web”, Proc. ICSLP '2000, Beijing, China 2000.
Logan et al., “Word and subword indexing approaches for reducing the effects of OOV queries on spoken audio”, Proc HLT '2002.
P. Schauble et al., “First experience with a system for content based retrieval of information from speech recordings.” Proc. IJCAI '95.
Ng, “Subword-based approaches for spoken document retrieval” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts institute of Technology, 2000.
James et al., “A fast lattice-based approach to vocabulary-independent wordspotting”, Proc. ICASSP '04, Adelaide, 1994.
Clements et al., “Phonetic Searching vx. LVCSR: How to find what you really want in audio archives”, AVIOS 2001.
Evermann et al., “Large Vocabulary Decoding and Confidence Estimate Using Word Posterior Probabilities”, Proc. ICASSP '2000, pp. 2366-2369, Istanbul, 2000.
Schwartz et al., “A comparison of several approximate algorithms for finding multiple (n-best) sentence hypotheses”, Proc. ICSLP '94, Yokohama 1994.
Ortmanns et al., “A comparison of the time conditioned and word conditioned search techniques for large-vocabulary speech recognition”, Proc. ICSLP '96, vol. 2, pp. 1017-1020, Philadelphia, 1996.
D. Klakow, “Language-model optimization by mapping of corpora”, Proc. ICASSP '98.
Gales et al., “Porting: Switchboard to the Voicemail task”, Proc. ICASSP '03, Hongkong, 2003.
Logan et al., “Fusion of Semantic and Acoustic Approaches for Spoken Document Retrieval”, Proc. ISCA Workshop on Multilingual Spoken Document Retrieval, April 4-5, 2003, Hong Kong, Copyright Hewlett-Packard Company 2003.
Fast-Talk Communications, “The Power to Search Audio”, http://www.fast-talk.com.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Phonetic fragment search in speech data does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Phonetic fragment search in speech data, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Phonetic fragment search in speech data will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2786659

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.