Electricity: measuring and testing – Particle precession resonance – Spectrometer components
Patent
1993-03-26
1994-07-26
Tokar, Michael J.
Electricity: measuring and testing
Particle precession resonance
Spectrometer components
324318, 324302, 324306, G01R 3320
Patent
active
053329716
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a permanent magnet for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging equipment. Specifically, magnet in question is a magnet that is used in equipment such as this to produce a homogeneous and intense magnetic field in a zone of interest. In the medical field, a patient is placed in this zone of interest. The invention can be applied to other fields, notably to industrial controls. It is aimed at producing a so-called transversal field.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
There are known permanent magnet structures, notably those of the so called plate-magnet type. Structures such as these are described, for example, in the European patent application No. EP-A-0 170 318. Or, again, structures such as these are described in the U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,672,346; 4,679,022 and 4,818,966. Other types of permanent magnet structures are also already known: these are notably a spherical permanent magnet with equatorial access as described in the French patent application No. 2 605 452.
The drawback of the so-called plate-magnet structures lies in the closing of the magnetic field lines. Indeed, to put it in the simple way, in a plate-magnet structure, the transverse field is produced in an air gap located between two plates of permanently magnetized material. The southern face of one plate faces the northern face of the other plate on either side of the gap. The closing of the magnetic field lines is therefore organized between the faces that are furthest away from the two plates. To avoid detrimental effects on the value of the field produced in the air gap by the existence of this other air gap for the closing of the field lines, it is the usual practice to position, between these two distant faces, closing structures made of a magnetizable magnetic material, typically soft iron. These soft iron structures have several drawbacks. Firstly, although the cost of soft iron is low, it nevertheless adds to the price of the magnet. Furthermore, these soft iron structures take up space and limit the points of access to the useful zone of the air. The ideal solution would be to close the field lines everywhere. However, in this case, it is no longer possible to enter the zone of interest of the magnet.
Furthermore, the approaches thus conceived firstly do not lead to great homogeneity of the intense magnetic field in the zone of interest and, secondly, are most likely to give rise to eddy currents during the sequences for the excitation and measurement of the NMR signal used in the imaging methods. The homogeneity is not high for it can only be empirical. Indeed, these soft iron structures, which are also used to hold the magnetic plates, have shapes dictated by considerations of mechanics that do not lend themselves to the preparation of precise models of their contribution to the magnetic field. It is possible to use only techniques of computation by finite elements which do not have sufficient precision with respect to the homogeneity of the field required by the NMR.
The fact remains, therefore, that it is necessary to carry out the empirical validation of the actually created field. This empirical validation makes it necessary to conceive of the positioning of soft iron parts at certain particularly appropriate places so as to measure the effects of this positioning and carry out the consequent modification until, little by little, the requisite modification is achieved. This empirical technique is not an industrial-scale technique: great skills are required to make only one copy, and the technique is not easily reproducible.
With regard to eddy currents, the pulsed characteristics of the gradients of the additional magnetic field, applied during the sequences for the excitation and measurement of the NMR signal in the examinations, run counter to such an approach because soft iron is conductive. In the invention, as shall be seen further below, a structure without soft iron is used, implementing solely blocks of magnets which, furthermore, can be computed analytically. If the
REFERENCES:
patent: 4538130 (1985-08-01), Gluckstern et al.
patent: 4580098 (1986-05-01), Gluckstern et al.
patent: 4829277 (1989-05-01), Stahura et al.
patent: 4893103 (1990-01-01), Leupold
patent: 4990874 (1991-02-01), Aubert
patent: 4994778 (1991-02-01), Leupold
patent: 4998084 (1991-03-01), Alff
patent: 4999600 (1991-03-01), Aubert
patent: 5099217 (1992-03-01), Leupold
patent: 5103200 (1992-04-01), Leupold
patent: 5134374 (1992-07-01), Breneman et al.
patent: 5148138 (1992-09-01), Miyata
patent: 5194810 (1993-03-01), Breneman et al.
Mah Raymond Y.
Tokar Michael J.
Universite Joseph Fourier
LandOfFree
Permanent magnet for nuclear magnetic resonance imaging equipmen does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Permanent magnet for nuclear magnetic resonance imaging equipmen, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Permanent magnet for nuclear magnetic resonance imaging equipmen will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-1055025