Metal treatment – Process of modifying or maintaining internal physical... – Magnetic materials
Reexamination Certificate
2001-08-14
2003-07-22
Sheehan, John (Department: 1742)
Metal treatment
Process of modifying or maintaining internal physical...
Magnetic materials
C148S104000, C252S062540
Reexamination Certificate
active
06596096
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
The invention relates generally to permanent magnet materials, methods of making permanent magnet materials, and electromagnetic devices including permanent magnet materials.
Many types of electromechanical energy converters such as motors, generators, and actuators use permanent magnets to create an open circuit flux density which interacts with a field created by an electric circuit to provide torque. To a large extent, the size and efficiency of a converter of a given power rating is determined by the “energy density” of the magnet in the device. The higher the open circuit air gap flux density produced by the magnet, the more torque that can be produced per unit weight and the higher the motor efficiency for a given power input. Open circuit flux is determined by the strength of the magnet and the effective length of the air gap. The stronger the magnet and the smaller the effective air gap, the more efficient and smaller the machine.
As a practical matter, cost savings can be achieved by making the magnets as thin as feasible while providing a sufficient thickness to prevent demagnetization from armature reaction flux density. As compared with thicker magnets, thinner magnets require less space. However, the permanent magnets are typically designed to be thick so as to avoid experiencing an operating point that might result in demagnetization. For example, magnet thicknesses for 373 Watt (one-half horse power) motors typically range from about 2.54 millimeters (about 0.1 inches) to about 7.62 millimeters (about 0.3 inches).
It would be desirable to have a permanent magnetic material not constrained by conventional thicknesses and having high residual magnetization and large intrinsic coercive force.
SUMMARY
Briefly, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a permanent magnet comprises: iron-boron-rare earth alloy particulate having an intrinsic coercive force of at least about 1591 kiloamperes/meter (about 20 kiloOersteds) and a residual magnetization of at least about 0.8 tesla (about 8 kiloGauss), wherein the rare earth content comprises praseodymium, a light rare earth element selected from the group consisting of cerium, lanthanum, yttrium and mixtures thereof, and balance neodymium; and a binder bonding the particulate.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a method of fabricating at least one permanent magnet comprises: providing iron-boron-rare earth alloy particulate having an intrinsic coercive force of at least about 1591 kiloamperes/meter (about 20 kiloOersteds) and a residual magnetization of at least about 0.8 tesla (about 8 kiloGauss), wherein the rare earth content comprises praseodymium, a light rare earth element selected from the group consisting of cerium, lanthanum, yttrium and mixtures thereof, and balance neodymium; providing a binder; bonding the particulate with the binder to provide moldable particulate material; and molding the at least one permanent magnet from the moldable particulate material.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4496395 (1985-01-01), Croat
patent: 4558077 (1985-12-01), Gray
patent: 4765848 (1988-08-01), Mohri et al.
patent: 4778542 (1988-10-01), Clemens
patent: 4781754 (1988-11-01), Soranno et al.
patent: 4802931 (1989-02-01), Croat
patent: 4836868 (1989-06-01), Yajima et al.
patent: 4842656 (1989-06-01), Maines et al.
patent: 4851058 (1989-07-01), Croat
patent: 4902361 (1990-02-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5172751 (1992-12-01), Croat
patent: 5174362 (1992-12-01), Croat
patent: 5288447 (1994-02-01), Day
patent: 5356984 (1994-10-01), Carbone et al.
patent: 6120620 (2000-09-01), Benz et al.
patent: 6359359 (2002-03-01), Miura et al.
patent: WO0122438 (2001-03-01), None
US 4,756,775, 7/1988, Croat (withdrawn)
J. Croat “Magnetic Hardening of PR-FE and ND-FE Alloys by Melt-Spinning”, J. Appl. Phys. 53(4), Apr. 1982, pp. 3161-3168.
Y. Luo, “Review of the NDFEB Patent Situation”, Magnews Summer 2001, pp. 15-19.
U.S. patent application Entitled “Method and Apparatus for Magnetizing a Permanent Magnet” by Km Amm, et al (Attorney Docket Rd-29,209) Ser. No. and filing date not yet assigned.
Peter Campbell, “Permanent Magnet Materials and Their Application”, 1994, pp. 72-73.
Benz Mark Gilbert
Carl Ralph James
Kliman Gerald Burt
Marte Judson Sloan
Shei Juliana Chiang
Freedman Philip D.
General Electric Company
Johnson Noreen C.
Sheehan John
LandOfFree
Permanent magnet for electromagnetic device and method of... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Permanent magnet for electromagnetic device and method of..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Permanent magnet for electromagnetic device and method of... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3081366