Patient sensory response evaluation for neuromodulation...

Surgery – Diagnostic testing – Sensitivity to electric stimulus

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C600S545000

Reexamination Certificate

active

11497939

ABSTRACT:
The invention is directed to a technique for rating neuromodulation efficacy based on evaluation of the response of the patient to sensory stimuli with and without delivery of neuromodulation therapy. In addition, the invention may provide a system capable of delivering sensory stimuli on a quantitative basis in a coordinated manner with delivery of neuromodulation therapy. A device programmer may provide a platform for controlling delivery of the sensory stimuli, delivery of neuromodulation therapy, and generation of rating information for neuromodulation efficacy based on patient sensory response to the stimuli. In operation, the programmer controls application of selected sensory stimuli to the patient's body and records the patient's verbal or physiological responses to the stimuli. This invention can be used to be a diagnostic or prognostic test that a given neuromodulation therapy, such as neurostimulation or drug delivery, is and will be successful.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4305402 (1981-12-01), Katims
patent: 4503863 (1985-03-01), Katims
patent: 4557271 (1985-12-01), Stoller et al.
patent: 4570640 (1986-02-01), Barsa
patent: 4640266 (1987-02-01), Levy
patent: 5018526 (1991-05-01), Gaston-Johansson
patent: 5191896 (1993-03-01), Gafni et al.
patent: 5233984 (1993-08-01), Thompson
patent: 5370672 (1994-12-01), Fowler et al.
patent: 5388587 (1995-02-01), Knutsson et al.
patent: 5433211 (1995-07-01), Brammer et al.
patent: 5443486 (1995-08-01), Hrdlicka et al.
patent: 5692500 (1997-12-01), Gaston-Johansson
patent: 5725472 (1998-03-01), Weathers
patent: 5797854 (1998-08-01), Hedgecock
patent: 5806522 (1998-09-01), Katims
patent: 5814092 (1998-09-01), King
patent: 5893881 (1999-04-01), Elsberry et al.
patent: 5913882 (1999-06-01), King
patent: 5938690 (1999-08-01), Law et al.
patent: 5941833 (1999-08-01), Lipman
patent: 6018682 (2000-01-01), Rise
patent: 6027456 (2000-02-01), Feler et al.
patent: 6066163 (2000-05-01), John
patent: 6104956 (2000-08-01), Naritoku et al.
patent: 6113552 (2000-09-01), Shimazu et al.
patent: 6146334 (2000-11-01), Laserow
patent: 6249703 (2001-06-01), Stanton et al.
patent: 6308102 (2001-10-01), Sieracki et al.
patent: 6315736 (2001-11-01), Tsutsumi et al.
patent: 6337997 (2002-01-01), Rise
patent: 6366813 (2002-04-01), DiLorenzo
patent: 6418344 (2002-07-01), Rezai et al.
patent: 6463328 (2002-10-01), John
patent: 6473653 (2002-10-01), Schallhorn et al.
patent: 6537231 (2003-03-01), Teich et al.
patent: 6612983 (2003-09-01), Marchal
patent: 6644321 (2003-11-01), Behm
patent: 6647299 (2003-11-01), Bourget
patent: 6654642 (2003-11-01), North et al.
patent: 6687538 (2004-02-01), Hrdlicka et al.
patent: 6702767 (2004-03-01), Douglas et al.
patent: 2001/0007950 (2001-07-01), North et al.
patent: 2002/0103428 (2002-08-01), deCharms
patent: 2002/0107434 (2002-08-01), Lange et al.
patent: 2002/0111754 (2002-08-01), Lange et al.
patent: 2002/0128798 (2002-09-01), Lange et al.
patent: 2002/0147485 (2002-10-01), Mamo et al.
patent: 2002/0177882 (2002-11-01), DeLorenzo
patent: 2003/0105413 (2003-06-01), Bleustein et al.
patent: 2003/0139785 (2003-07-01), Riff et al.
patent: 2003/0171789 (2003-09-01), Malek et al.
patent: 2003/0204148 (2003-10-01), Lange et al.
patent: 2004/0006377 (2004-01-01), Behm
patent: 2004/0059395 (2004-03-01), North et al.
patent: 2004/0079372 (2004-04-01), John et al.
patent: 2004/0098063 (2004-05-01), Goetz
patent: 2004/0133119 (2004-07-01), Osorio et al.
patent: 2005/0043774 (2005-02-01), Devlin et al.
patent: 2006/0135877 (2006-06-01), Giftakis et al.
patent: 0 236 513 (1987-09-01), None
patent: 0 364 158 (1990-04-01), None
patent: 0 438 541 (1991-07-01), None
patent: 0 530 354 (1993-03-01), None
patent: 0 892 654 (1999-01-01), None
patent: 2 049 431 (1980-12-01), None
patent: WO 91/16001 (1991-10-01), None
patent: WO 92/10134 (1992-06-01), None
patent: WO 96/01665 (1996-01-01), None
patent: WO 97/06730 (1997-02-01), None
patent: WO 99/56821 (1999-11-01), None
patent: WO 99/66838 (1999-12-01), None
patent: WO 00/07494 (2000-02-01), None
patent: WO 01/54581 (2001-08-01), None
patent: WO 02/02008 (2002-01-01), None
patent: WO 02/32304 (2002-04-01), None
patent: WO 03/028804 (2003-04-01), None
patent: WO 03/037430 (2003-05-01), None
patent: WO 03/072025 (2003-09-01), None
patent: WO 03/090821 (2003-11-01), None
patent: WO 03/105687 (2003-12-01), None
patent: WO 2004/036372 (2004-04-01), None
patent: WO 2004/036377 (2004-04-01), None
patent: WO 2004/037114 (2004-05-01), None
patent: WO 2004/041080 (2004-05-01), None
patent: WO 2004/041351 (2004-05-01), None
patent: WO 2004/041352 (2004-05-01), None
patent: WO 2004-041353 (2004-05-01), None
patent: WO 2004/041359 (2004-05-01), None
Shy et al., “Quantitative Sensory Testing,” American Academy of Neurology, pp. 898-904 (2003).
Sindou et al., “Predictive Value of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials for Long-Lasting Pain Relief After Spinal Cord Stimulation: Practical Use for Patient Selection,” Neurosurgery, vol. 52, No. 6, pp. 1374-1384 (2003).
Abe et al., “Change of Current Perception Threshold by Spinal Cord Stimulation,” Poster Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Pain Clinicians, Sendai, Japan, p. 1 (2003).
Samuelsson et al., “Thermal Quantitative Sensory Testing in Lumbar Disc Herniation,” Eur Spine J., 11, pp. 71-75 (2002).
Rasche et al., “Quantitative Sensory Testing in Patients with Chronic Unilateral Radicular Neuropathic Pain and Active Spinal Cord Stimulation,” Neuromodulation, vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 239-247 (2006).
Navarro et al., “Evaluation of thermal and pain sensitivity in type I diabetic patients,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, vol. 54, pp. 60-64, 1991.
Jamal et al., “An improved automated method for the measurement of thermal thresholds. 1. normal subjects,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, vol. 48, pp. 354-360, 1985.
Fowler et al., “A portable system for measuring cutaneous thresholds for warming and cooling,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, vol. 50, pp. 1211-1215, 1987.
Yarnitsky et al., “Studies of heat pain sensation in man: perception thresholds, rate of stimulus rise and reaction time,” Pain, vol. 40, pp. 85-91, 1990.
Fruhstorfer et al., “Method for quantitative estimation of thermal thresholds in patients,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, vol. 39, pp. 1071-1075, 1976.
Arezzo et al., “Device for Quantitative Assessment of Thermal Sense in Diabetic Neuropathy,” Diabetes, vol. 35, pp. 590-592, 1986.
Campbell et al., “Local Analgesia From Percutaneous Electrical Stimulation,” Arch Neurol, vol. 28, pp. 347-350, 1973.
Kemler et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy,” New Engl J Med, vol. 343, No. 9, pp. 618-624, 2000.
Kemler et al., “Impact of Spinal Cord Stimulation on Sensory Characteristics in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I,” Anesthesiology, vol. 95, pp. 72-80, 2001.
Larson et al., “Neurophysiological effects of dorsal column stimulation in man and monkey,” J. Neurosurg., vol. 41, pp. 217-223, 1974.
Li, et al., “Windup leads to characteristics of central sensitization,” Pain, vol. 79, pp. 75-82, 1999.
Merskey et al., “Classification of chronic pain: Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms,” IASP Press, Seattle, pp. 40-42, 1994.
Ochoa, “The human sensory unit and pain: New concepts, syndromes, and tests,” Muscle & Nerve, vol. 16, pp. 1009-1016, 1993.
Ochoa et al., “Mechanical Hyperalgesias in Neuropathic Pain Patients: Dynamic and Static Subtypes,” Ann Neurol., vol. 33, pp. 465-472, 1993.
Price, “The use of experimental pain in evaluating the effects of dorsal column stimulation on clinical pain,” Pain, vol. 45, pp. 225-226, 1991.
Price et al., “Spatial and temporal transformations of input to spinothalamic tr

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Patient sensory response evaluation for neuromodulation... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Patient sensory response evaluation for neuromodulation..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Patient sensory response evaluation for neuromodulation... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3919153

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.