Gas separation: processes – Deflecting – And filtering
Reexamination Certificate
2002-12-27
2004-03-30
Smith, Duane (Department: 1724)
Gas separation: processes
Deflecting
And filtering
C095S278000, C095S020000, C055S282300, C055S307000, C055S308000, C055S320000, C055S325000, C055S385300, C055S464000, C055S523000, C055SDIG001, C055SDIG003
Reexamination Certificate
active
06712884
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a particle trap for separating particles out of a fluid or exhaust gas flow, having at least one flow channel through which the fluid flows. The invention also relates to a process for separating particles out of a fluid or exhaust gas flow. Additionally, the invention relates to a honeycomb body and an exhaust system having a particle trap.
A particle trap of the type described above is used to separate solid particles which are contained in a flowing fluid out of the flow. Particle traps of that type have particular practical significance when cleaning diesel exhaust gases from vehicles. In that case, it must be possible to regenerate the particle trap by oxidizing the particles. It should be possible to fit the trap in a pipe, such as for example in an exhaust system of a motor vehicle.
Particles in the exhaust gases of a motor vehicle often accumulate on a coating and/or an outer wall, such as for example in the exhaust system and/or in a catalytic converter of the motor vehicle. In the event of load changes, they are then expelled in the form of a cloud of particles, such as for example a cloud of soot.
In order to separate out the particles, it is customary to use screens, which are in some cases also referred to as filters. Although screens are fundamentally able to trap the particles, they have two significant drawbacks: firstly, they may become blocked, and secondly they cause an undesired pressure drop. If screens are not used, there is a risk that the honeycomb body of the catalytic converter will become blocked, i.e. the pores of the precious metals will become covered, and it will be impossible for either pollutants or oxygen to diffuse to the precious metals at the locations which have been covered by the particles. Moreover, it is necessary to observe statutory values for motor vehicle emissions, which would be exceeded without a reduction in the level of particles. It is therefore necessary to provide elements for trapping exhaust-gas particles which avoid the drawbacks of the screens and filters and do not impair the activity of the catalytic converters.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is accordingly an object of the invention to provide a particle trap and a process for separating particles out of an exhaust gas flow and a honeycomb body and an exhaust system having a particle trap, which overcome the hereinafore-mentioned disadvantages of the heretofore-known devices and methods of this general type and which separate particles out of an exhaust gas flow with the highest possible efficiency, while the particles that have been separated out can also subsequently be removed by oxidation, so that the particle trap can be regenerated.
With the foregoing and other objects in view there is provided, in accordance with the invention, a particle trap for separating particles out of an exhaust gas flow. The particle trap comprises at least one flow channel through which an exhaust gas flows. The flow channel has at least one wall with regions. At least the regions are made from porous or highly porous material. The flow channel also has internals acting as a diverting or guiding structure for diverting the particles out of the exhaust gas flow to the regions made from porous or highly porous material.
With the objects of the invention in view, there is also provided a process for separating particles out of an exhaust gas flow, which comprises providing a particle trap with at least one flow channel having a porous or highly porous channel wall, and providing at least one diverting or guiding structure in the at least one flow channel. Particles of an exhaust gas flowing through the particle trap are thrown or diverted onto the porous channel wall by the at least one diverting or guiding structure.
The above-described structure and mode of operation of the invention are advantageous because it has surprisingly been seen that the particles which are diverted out of the flow or exhaust gas toward the regions made from porous or highly porous material by the internals remain attached to the porous channel wall as a result of interception and/or impaction. The pressure differences in the flow profile of the flowing fluid are of importance in bringing about this effect. The deflections allow additional local reduced pressure and increased pressure conditions to be established, which lead to a filtration effect through the porous wall, since the pressure differences have to be compensated for.
In contrast to closed screen or filter systems, the particle trap is open, since there are no blind flow alleys. These properties can also serve in this case to characterize the particle trap, for example by saying that an open view of 20% means that, when viewed in cross section, it is possible to see through approximately 20% of the area. This would correspond to an area of >0.1 mm
2
for a 600 cpsi carrier with d (hydraulic)=0.8 mm.
Suitable materials for the particle trap are metal, plastic, ceramic, etc., at least for that part of the channel wall which lies approximately opposite the internals that are porous when constructing the flow channels.
The porous material being used may be any porous or highly porous sintered and/or fibrous substance. In addition to the deposition and adhesion behavior with respect to soot particles (for example large geometric surface area, large inflow area, suitable depth of the structure), the dimensional stability, strength and resistance to corrosion of the porous or highly porous material also play a role.
The particle trap according to the invention and the process according to the invention are particularly significant when used on honeycomb bodies which are known from catalytic converters of motor vehicles. In this case, a porous channel wall is produced, for example, by forming the entire honeycomb body from porous material. When forming the honeycomb body from porous or highly porous material, the extent to which fluid can flow through the porous material is of interest to the extent that it is possible to achieve a radial flow through the particle trap through the use of completely porous channel walls.
The channel wall is considered to be the channel wall over the entire length of the flow channel or a part of the entire channel wall.
Through the use of the diverting or guiding structure, that is to say the internals, particles are deflected out of the fluid, at certain velocities, onto the porous wall, to which they adhere. In the particle trap, the particles are separated out on the basis of the “striker” and “catcher” principle. The diverting structure, as the “striker”, diverts the particles toward the “catcher” of the porous channel wall or interlayer. The diverting structures within a flow channel may be identical or different, and the structuring of the flow channels within a particle trap may also vary.
The cross section of the flow channel is dimensioned in such a way that even the smallest point in the channel allows particles of an average size to pass through. The cross section is influenced by the diverting or guiding structures and may be identical or different over the length of the flow channel.
In accordance with another feature of the invention, the region made from porous or highly porous material is formed by an interlayer which is disposed on the nonporous channel wall. This provides a greater freedom of choice in terms of the materials being used.
In accordance with a further feature of the invention, the internals include at least one projection, hump, protuberance or the like, which is disposed so as to project out of the channel wall opposite the region made from porous or highly porous material and, if appropriate, in an axially offset manner. In this way, the internals can be produced easily in terms of manufacturing technology and at optimum locations.
In accordance with an added feature of the invention, a plurality of projections, humps, protuberances or the like are disposed in succession, and all project equally far from the
Brück Rolf
Reizig Meike
Treiber Peter
EMITEC Gesellschaft fuer Emisssionstechnologies GmbH
Greenberg Laurence A.
Greene Jason M.
Locher Ralph E.
Smith Duane
LandOfFree
Particle trap and process for separating particles out of an... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Particle trap and process for separating particles out of an..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Particle trap and process for separating particles out of an... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3253732