Abrading – Machine – Sandblast
Reexamination Certificate
2000-09-08
2003-02-25
Hail, III, Joseph J. (Department: 3723)
Abrading
Machine
Sandblast
C451S075000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06524172
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates generally to particle feeders, and is particularly directed to a device which provides improved transport of particles into a particle blast gas flow for ultimate delivery as entrained particles to a workpiece or other target. The invention will be specifically disclosed in connection with a hopper and transport mechanism in a cryogenic particle blast system which provides improved flow of particles to the exit of the hopper and prevents or reduces the agglomeration of particles exiting the hopper into, for example, a transport rotor, for delivery to the transport gas of the particle blast system.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Particle blasting systems have been around for several decades. Typically, particles, also known as blast media, is fed into a transport gas flow and are transported as entrained particles to a blast nozzle, from which the particles exit, being directed toward a workpiece or other target. It is not unknown for the particles to clump or stick together, impeding the delivery of particles into the transport gas flow.
Such compaction and agglomeration of particles is particularly a problem when the blast media is cryogenic particles, such as in carbon dioxide blasting. Although still a relatively young industry, carbon dioxide blasting systems are well known in the industry, and along with various associated component parts, are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,744,181, 4,843,770, 4,947,592, 5,050,805, 5,018,667, 5,109,636, 5,188,151, 5,301,509, 5,571,335, 5,301,509, 5,473,903, 5,660,580 and 5,795,214, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Although the present invention will be described herein in connection with a particle feeder for use with carbon dioxide blasting, it will be understood that the present invention is not limited in use or application to carbon dioxide blasting. The teachings of the present invention may be used in application in which there can be compaction or agglomeration of any type of particle blast media.
Generally, the blast media particles, such as carbon dioxide particles, are transported from a hopper, which holds the supply of particles, into a transport gas. The particles may be introduced into the transport gas by venturi or other vacuum effect, or by a feeder. Various feeder designs exist, functioning to transport the particles from the hopper exit into the transport gas, such as by the radial transport feeder shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,947,592. Hoppers may receive particles from any source, such as a pelletizer that is part of the blast system, or a source separate from the blast system and loaded into the hopper.
Prior attempts in the art to promote the flow of particles, and in particular cryogenic particles, to and through the exit of a hopper or other storage/feeder structure include the use of vibrators or thumpers which act on the walls of the hopper and the use of vertically oriented rotating augers and stirrers in or adjacent the hopper exit to mechanically advance the particles. Typically hoppers have been fairly rigidly connected to the blast system frame, which is now recognized to be a significant impediment to transferring sufficient energy to the hopper walls to effect the flow of particles. In such designs, a significant portion of the energy transferred to the hopper was also transferred through the hopper to the blast system frame. The energy that went to the frame produced undesirable results, manifested as noise, vibration and movement of the entire system, fatigue and stress in the hopper and frame, as well as the consumption of extra energy.
The desired higher total energy was difficult to achieve with thumpers, in which reciprocating plungers/strikers repetitively strike the hopper, as the size of the movable mass was a limiting factor. Each impact of a large mass against a hopper could undesirably cause the entire system to jump. Thus, the required level of energy was achieved though high frequency/low mass vibrators. High frequency, however, tends to compact the particles, impeding the flow. Vertical hopper walls compounded the compaction problem present with high frequency energy, forcing hopper walls away from vertical walls to inclined walls. However, hoppers with inclined walls have less internal capacity than hoppers with vertical walls.
With cryogenic particles, even when they are moved toward the exit of the hopper, they may easily bridge the exit, or form agglomerated clumps too large to be ingested by the feeder mechanism, slowing or blocking particle flow.
Thus, there is a need in the art for particle blast system that has improved, reliable particle flow from the hopper to the hopper exit and on to the transport gas.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the teachings of the present invention, the hopper assembly is isolated from the rest of the particle blast system on a hopper slide assembly. Energy is imparted to the hopper by an impulse assembly, which preferably is mounted to the hopper for example on a side wall, such as a reciprocating mass to produce discrete, low frequency energy impulses. The closer to the hopper exit that the energy is imparted to the hopper, the more effective the energy is at promoting the flow of particles. The isolation of the hopper allows most of the energy produced by the impulse assembly to be transferred directly to the cryogenic particles in the hopper, allowing the hopper to have vertical walls, maximizing the capacity of the hopper over the sloped side prior art hoppers. By mounting the hopper on a sliding frame, the hopper can be slid out of alignment with the feeder mechanism, allowing the hopper to be cleared of clogs or emptied of unused/unwanted particles, and more easily serviced or completely removed.
Having utility independent of the isolated hopper, another aspect of the present invention includes an operator controllable reciprocable member which can be selectively extended into the particle flow from the hopper to the feeder, mechanically breaking up agglomerated particles.
REFERENCES:
patent: 2235324 (1941-03-01), Moreland
patent: 2246497 (1941-06-01), Beck
patent: 2254448 (1941-09-01), Pursel
patent: 2640629 (1953-06-01), Thomson et al.
patent: 3257040 (1966-06-01), Dumbaugh et al.
patent: 3407972 (1968-10-01), Cymbalisty
patent: 4031032 (1977-06-01), Jablecki
patent: 4067150 (1978-01-01), Merrigan
patent: 4094448 (1978-06-01), Häseler et al.
patent: 4707951 (1987-11-01), Gibot et al.
patent: 4744181 (1988-05-01), Moore et al.
patent: 4843770 (1989-07-01), Crane et al.
patent: 4947592 (1990-08-01), Lloyd et al.
patent: 5018667 (1991-05-01), Lloyd
patent: 5050805 (1991-09-01), Lloyd et al.
patent: 5109636 (1992-05-01), Lloyd et al.
patent: 5188151 (1993-02-01), Young et al.
patent: 5245798 (1993-09-01), Carpenter
patent: 5301509 (1994-04-01), Lloyd et al.
patent: 5405049 (1995-04-01), Ricciardi
patent: 5473903 (1995-12-01), Lloyd et al.
patent: 5571335 (1996-11-01), Lloyd
patent: 5618177 (1997-04-01), Abbott
patent: 5660580 (1997-08-01), Lehnig
patent: 5685435 (1997-11-01), Picioccio et al.
patent: 5716113 (1998-02-01), Plourde
patent: 5795214 (1998-08-01), Leon
patent: 6148636 (2000-11-01), Wade, Jr.
patent: 6188936 (2001-02-01), Maguire et al.
patent: 0786311 (1997-07-01), None
Dressman R. Kevin
Rivir Michael E.
Cold Jet, Inc.
Frost Brown Todd LLC
Hail III Joseph J.
Thomas David B.
LandOfFree
Particle blast apparatus does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Particle blast apparatus, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Particle blast apparatus will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3121335