Packet processing in a multiple processor system

Details Packet processing in a multiple processor system Packet processing in a multiple processor system

2006-01-25

2010-06-29

Cho, Hong (Department: 2467)

Multiplex communications

Pathfinding or routing

Switching a message which includes an address header

C370S401000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07746862

ABSTRACT:
Packet processing is provided in a multiple processor system including a first processor to processing a packet and to create a tag associated with the packet. The tag includes information about the processing of the packet. A second processor receives the packet subsequent to the first processor and processes the packet using the tag information.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5598410 (1997-01-01), Stone
patent: 5606668 (1997-02-01), Shwed
patent: 5835726 (1998-11-01), Shwed et al.
patent: 6006264 (1999-12-01), Colby et al.
patent: 6119236 (2000-09-01), Shipley
patent: 6253321 (2001-06-01), Nikander et al.
patent: 6275942 (2001-08-01), Bernhard et al.
patent: 6279113 (2001-08-01), Vaidya
patent: 6301668 (2001-10-01), Gleichauf et al.
patent: 6304975 (2001-10-01), Shipley
patent: 6311278 (2001-10-01), Raanan et al.
patent: 6321338 (2001-11-01), Porras et al.
patent: 6370603 (2002-04-01), Silverman et al.
patent: 6421730 (2002-07-01), Narad et al.
patent: 6449647 (2002-09-01), Colby et al.
patent: 6453345 (2002-09-01), Tracka et al.
patent: 6466985 (2002-10-01), Goyal et al.
patent: 6487666 (2002-11-01), Shanklin et al.
patent: 6499107 (2002-12-01), Gleichauf et al.
patent: 6600744 (2003-07-01), Carr et al.
patent: 6768738 (2004-07-01), Yazaki et al.
patent: 6781992 (2004-08-01), Rana et al.
patent: 6788648 (2004-09-01), Peterson
patent: 6851061 (2005-02-01), Holland et al.
patent: 6856991 (2005-02-01), Srivastava
patent: 7006443 (2006-02-01), Storr
patent: 7139679 (2006-11-01), McGrew
patent: 7376085 (2008-05-01), Yazaki et al.
patent: 2001/0028650 (2001-10-01), Yoshizawa et al.
patent: 2002/0032797 (2002-03-01), Xu
patent: 2002/0080789 (2002-06-01), Henderson et al.
patent: 2002/0124187 (2002-09-01), Lyle et al.
patent: 2002/0126621 (2002-09-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 2003/0105976 (2003-06-01), Copeland
patent: 2003/0145225 (2003-07-01), Bruton, III et al.
patent: 2003/0149888 (2003-08-01), Yadav
patent: 2003/0154399 (2003-08-01), Zuk et al.
patent: 2005/0141503 (2005-06-01), Welfeld
patent: 2005/0163132 (2005-07-01), Mieno et al.
patent: 2006/0005231 (2006-01-01), Zuk et al.
patent: 2000-312225 (2000-11-01), None
patent: 2003-78549 (2003-03-01), None
patent: WO 03/025766 (2003-03-01), None
International Search Report for corresponding PCT application, PCT/US2004/009607, dated Oct. 22, 2004, 3 pages.
Stonesoft, ‘StoneBeatSecurity Cluster White Paper,’ Aug. 2000, Finland, pp. 1-9.
Stonesoft, ‘Secure Highly Available Enterprise-A White Paper,’ Feb. 2001, Finland, pp. 1-10.
Stonesoft, ‘StoneGate White Paper,’ Mar. 2001, Finland, pp. 1-6.
Stonesoft Corp. ‘StoneGate,’ product webpage, www.stonesoft.com/document/363.html, Mar. 27, 2001 (print date), pp. 1-2.
Stonesoft Corp. ‘Next Level of Network Accessibility’ webpage, www.stonesoft.com/document/183.html, Mar. 27, 2001 (print date), p. 1.
Stonesoft Corp., ‘Platforms,’ webpage, www.stonesoft.com/document/186.html, Mar. 27, 2001 (print date), p. 1.
Nokia, ‘Technical White Paper: The IP Clustering Power of Nokia VPN-Keeping Customers Connected,’ Apr. 2001, pp. 1-13.
Nokia, ‘Nokia VPN Solutions—Nokia VPN CC2500 Gateway,’ 2001, product information, pp. 1-2.
Nokia, ‘Nokia VPN Solutions—Nokia VPN CC5200 Gateway,’ 2001, product information, pp. 1-2.
Nokia, ‘Nokia VPN Solutions—Nokia VPN CC5205 Gateway,’ 2001; product information, pp. 1-2.
Axelsson, S., “Intrusion Detection Systems: A Survey and Taxonomy,”Dept. of Computer Eng., Chalmers Univ. of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden, Mar. 14, 2000, pp. 1-27.
Avolio, F., “Firewalls and Virtual Private Networks,” CSI Firewall Archives, printed Nov. 13, 2001, URL: http://www.spirit.com/CSI/Papers/fw+vpns.html, pp. 1-7.
Bace, R., “An Introduction to Intrusion Detection & Assessment,” ICSA Intrusion Detection Systems Consortium White Paper, 1999, URL: http://www.icsalabs.com/html/communities/ids/whitepaper/Intrusion1.pdf, pp. 1-38.
Business Wire, Inc., “NetScreen and OneSecure Unite to Deliver Industry's First Total Managed Security Services Platform,” San Jose, CA, Feb. 20, 2001, pp. 1-2.
Business Wire, Inc., “OneSecure Launches the First Co-Managed Security Services Platform,” Denver, CO, Jan. 29, 2001, pp. 1-2.
Carr, Jim, “Intrusion Detection Systems: Back to Front?,”Network Magazine, Sep. 5, 2001, URL:http://www.networkmagazine.com/article/NMG20010823S0007/2, pp. 1-9.
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., Firewall-1® Technical Overview P/N 500326, www.checkpoint.com, Oct. 2000, pp. 1-29.
Cisco Systems, “Cisco IOS Firewall Intrusion Detection System,” Cisco IOS Release 12.0(5)T, 2001, pp. 1-40.
Cisco Systems, “Cisco IOS Firewall Authentication Proxy,” Cisco IOS Release 12.0(5)T, 2001, pp. 1-48.
Clark, D., “RFC815-IP Datagram Reassembly Algorithms,” Internet RFC/STD/FYI/BCP Archives, http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc815.html, Jul. 1982, pp. 1-8.
Copeland, Dr. John A., “Observing Network Traffic-Techniques to Sort Out the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly,” PowerPoint Slide Presentation presented to ISSA-Atlanta, Jun. 27, 2001, pp. 1-22.
Denning, Dorothy E., “An Intrusion-Detection Model,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. SE-13, No. 2, Feb. 1987, 17 pages.
Farrow, Rik, “An Analysis of Current Firewall Technologies,”CSI 1997 Firewalls Matrix, 1998, URL:http://www.spirit.com/CSI/Papers/farrowpa.htm, pp. 1-5.
Firewall Product Comparison Table: VelociRaptor, BorderWare Firewall Server and Firewall-1/VPN-1 Gateway, www.spirit.com, printed Nov. 13, 2001, pp. 1-7.
Firewall Product Comparison Table: PIX Firewall, CyberGuard Firewall for UnixWare & CyberGuard Firewall for Windows NT, www.spirit.com, printed Nov. 13, 2001, pp. 1-8.
Firewall Product Comparison Table: CyberGuard Premium Appliance Firewall, InstaGate EX & BizGuardian VPN Firewall, www.spirit.com, printed Nov. 13, 2001, pp. 1-8.
Firewall Product Comparison Table: Server Protector 100, GNAT Box Firewall Software & Lucent Managed Firewall, www.spirit.com, printed Nov. 13, 2001, pp. 1-6.
Firewall Product Comparison Table: Internet Security and Acceleration (ISA) Server 2000, NetBSD/i386 Firewall & Guardian Firewall, www.spirit.com, printed Nov. 13, 2001, pp. 1-7.
Firewall Product Comparison Table: NetScreen-10 and NetScreen-100, CyberwallPLUS & BorderManager, www.spirit.com, printed Nov. 13, 2001, pp. 1-7.
Firewall Product Comparison Table: Gauntlet Firewall, Barricade Classic/XL & Barricade S, www.spirit.com, printed Nov. 13, 2001, pp. 1-8.
Firewall Product Comparison Table: Sidewinder™ , SecurePipe Managed Firewall Service & SnapGear, www.spirit.com, printed Nov. 13, 2001, pp. 1-7.
Firewall Product Comparison Table: SonicWALL PRO, Sunscreen Secure Net & WinRoute Pro 4.1, www.spirit.com, printed Nov. 13, 2001, pp. 1-6.
Firewall Product Comparison Table: WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. LiveSecurity System 4.6, www.spirit.com, printed Nov. 13, 2001, pp. 1-4.
Graham, R., “FAQ: Network Intrusion Detection System,” www.robertgraham.com/pubs
etwork-intrusion-detection.html, Ver. 0.8.3, Mar. 21, 2000, pp. 1-43.
Habra, N. et al., “ASAX: Software Architecture and Rule-Based Language for Universal Audit Trail Analysis,” Proceedings of the ESORICS '92, European Symposium on Research in Computer Security, Nov. 23-25, 1992, Toulouse, Springer-Verlag, 16 pages.
ICSA Labs, Intrusion Detection System Buyer's Guide, ICSA White Paper, 1999, pp. 1-52.
Jackson, K. et al., “Intrusion Detection System (IDS) Product Survey,”Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, LA-UR-99-3883 Ver. 2.1, Jun. 25, 1999, pp. 1-103.
Jones, Kyle, “Introduction to Firewalls,”IT Audit.org Forum Network Management, vol. 2, May 1, 1999, URL:http://www.itaudit.org/forum
etworkmanagement/f209nm.htm, pp. 1-5.
Lancope, “The Security Benefits of a Flow-Based

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Packet processing in a multiple processor system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Packet processing in a multiple processor system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Packet processing in a multiple processor system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4177117