Packaging architecture for 32 processor server

Electricity: electrical systems and devices – Housing or mounting assemblies with diverse electrical... – For electronic systems and devices

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C361S727000, C361S788000, C174S15800R

Reexamination Certificate

active

06452789

ABSTRACT:

TECHNICAL FIELD
This application is related in general to multi-processor computer systems, and in specific to an arrangement for packaging architecture for multi-processor computer systems.
BACKGROUND
In prior art systems
100
, a midplane
101
is used as the backbone for component interconnect, as shown in
FIG. 1. A
plurality of processor boards
102
, memory boards
103
, and I/O boards
104
are coupled to the midplane
101
. Controller chips
105
handle transporting transactions between the different components. Controller chip
106
manages transactions between system
100
and another system.
This arrangement has several disadvantages. One is the long length the data must traverse in moving between the processor and memory, processor and processor, and between the processor and I/O. For example, for a memory transaction, data must flow from the processor board
102
to the midplane
101
, through a series of controller chips
105
, and then to the memory board
103
. Responses flow back through this path to the processor. The long paths slow the computer system, and are an inefficient use of resources.
The dispersed and shared nature of the various components,
102
,
103
,
104
, does not allow for hot swapping of components. Thus, if one component has malfunctioned, for example a processor board
102
, then the entire system must be shut down so that the faulty component can be repaired and/or replaced. Thus, the prior art systems could not meet high availability requirements due to lack of supporting hardware and firmware.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
These and other objects, features and technical advantages are achieved by a system and method which uses a backplane to interconnect a plurality of modular cell boards. The cell board is the building block of the computer system. Each board comprises a plurality of processors, a processor controller subsystem, and a memory subsystem. For example, each board could comprise 4 processors, 1 processor controller chip, and 32 memory DIMMs. The processor controller chip manages communications between components on the cell board. The cell board also comprises a power subsystem, which may be located on a cell board or an a separate board that is connected to the cell board. A mechanical subassembly provides support for the cell board, as well as ventilation passages for cooling.
The controller chips, namely the crossbar chips and the router chips, are connected to one side of the backplane, while the cell boards are connected to the other side. The crossbars chips manage cell board to cell board communications. The router chips manage communications between computer systems located in different cabinets, e.g. the router chips manage communications between backplanes. For example, each backplane could comprise connections for 8 cell boards, 4 crossbar chips, 2 router chips, and three backplane power boards. Note that the power boards enable N+1 power supplying, such that the system would require N power supplies (for example, 2), and the +1 is a redundant power supply that allows for hot swapping power supplies, e.g. in field servicing and replacement. The controller chips are located adjacent to the power boards, such that air cooling is used for the controller chips and the power boards.
The cell boards are arranged in back to back pairs, with the outer most cell boards having their components extend beyond the height of the backplane. This allows for an increase of spacing between the front to front interface of adjacent cell boards. Thus, the backplane board area can be less than the area required to cover the arrangement of cell boards. In other words the footprint of the cell board connectors is smaller than the footprint of the cell board components.
The arrangement of the memory on the cell board reduces the path length, as well as handling chips required, for processor to memory transactions. This results in an increase in system speed.
The interconnection of the components via the backplane uses less physical space, and a reduction in interconnection cables and repeater chips.
The modular arrangement of the components allows for hot swapping (on-line field repair/replacement) of cell boards, power board, and controller chips (on backplane).
The arrangement of components also allows for forced air cooling. The component that require cooling are arranged such that air may be forced in one direction through the cabinet, and thus cool all of the components. This is less hazardous and less expensive than liquid cooling or freon based cooling.
The inventive arrangement has a reliable, hot swappable power system that has optimized distribution paths.
The system uses standard PCB board sizes while allowing the connection of processors that are wider than the boards.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4107760 (1978-08-01), Zimmer
patent: 4674004 (1987-06-01), Smith et al.
patent: 5280591 (1994-01-01), Garcia et al.
patent: 5327435 (1994-07-01), Warchol
patent: 5535099 (1996-07-01), McCarthy et al.
patent: 5544008 (1996-08-01), Dimmick et al.
patent: 5634034 (1997-05-01), Foster
patent: 5684671 (1997-11-01), Hobbs et al.
patent: 5822551 (1998-10-01), Crane et al.
patent: 5822608 (1998-10-01), Dieffenderfer et al.
patent: D402965 (1998-12-01), Bender
patent: 5870572 (1999-02-01), Garcia
patent: 5940266 (1999-08-01), Hamilton et al.
patent: 5940288 (1999-08-01), Kociecki
patent: 5966301 (1999-10-01), Cook et al.
patent: 5991163 (1999-11-01), Marconi et al.
patent: 6085273 (2000-07-01), Ball et al.
patent: 6147863 (2000-11-01), Moore et al.
patent: 6154373 (2000-11-01), Durston et al.
patent: 6175490 (2001-01-01), Papa et al.
patent: 6252791 (2001-06-01), Wallace et al.
patent: 6298289 (2001-10-01), Lloyd et al.
patent: 0598574 (1994-05-01), None
patent: 2352064 (2001-01-01), None
patent: 2 354 883 (2001-04-01), None
patent: 409330151 (1997-12-01), None
IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Apr. 1994, issue No. 4A, vol. 37, pp. 35-36.*
“SGI Scalable Servers” Datasheet 1999.
“Sun Enterprise 10000 Server” Technical White Paper Sep. 1998.
www.sun.com/servers/highend/10000/spec.html.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Packaging architecture for 32 processor server does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Packaging architecture for 32 processor server, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Packaging architecture for 32 processor server will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2871756

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.