Chemical apparatus and process disinfecting – deodorizing – preser – Analyzer – structured indicator – or manipulative laboratory... – Means for analyzing liquid or solid sample
Reexamination Certificate
1998-01-21
2001-02-20
Snay, Jeffrey (Department: 1743)
Chemical apparatus and process disinfecting, deodorizing, preser
Analyzer, structured indicator, or manipulative laboratory...
Means for analyzing liquid or solid sample
C436S068000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06190612
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to polymeric sensing membranes, and more particularly to polymeric sensing membranes comprising luminescent dyes and polymeric matrices having predictable gas permeabilities, and methods of making these membranes.
The ability to monitor gas concentration is advantageous in a variety of situations. For example, reactions carried out on a large scale in the chemical industry, such as fermentation reactions, often require the measurement of certain reactant or product gases. In medical care, continuous monitoring of the respiratory gases is becoming a common procedure for the study of respiration, assisting in anesthesiology and the treatment and diagnosis of cardiopulmonary disorders. In particular, it is often desirable to be able to monitor the level of oxygen in blood using in vitro methods.
One approach to measuring oxygen levels in blood is to use an oxygen-sensitive luminescent membrane. Such membranes typically comprise a polymeric matrix material and luminescent dye molecules dispersed within the polymeric material. The luminescent molecules are capable of emitting fluorescence or phosphorescence from excited electronic states which can be collisionally quenched by molecular oxygen. This process is commonly known as Stern-Volmer quenching and is described by the relationship
F
0
/F=&tgr;
0
/&tgr;=1+&tgr;
0
·k
q
[0
2
] (1)
where F
0
and &tgr;
0
are the luminous intensity and the relaxation time for the luminescent dye in the absence of molecular oxygen, F and &tgr; are the luminous intensity and the relaxation time when the molecular oxygen concentration [O
2
] is greater than zero, and k
q
is the quenching constant for the luminescent dye molecule. This equation is often rewritten in the form
F
0
/F=&tgr;
0
/&tgr;=1
+k
SV
·&rgr;O
2
(2)
where k
SV
is the Stem-Volmer constant (in (mmHg)
−1
or torr
−1
) and &rgr;O
2
is the partial pressure of oxygen. For the application described here, partial pressures are given in units of mmHg where one mmHg is equivalent to one torr.
In use, oxygen-sensitive membranes are exposed to electromagnetic radiation capable of exciting the luminescent dye molecule from the ground electronic state to an excited electronic state. This usually involves the excited singlet state for fluorescent molecules or the longer lived triplet state for phosphorescent dye molecules. When the luminescent dye molecules undergo a transition from the excited electronic state back to the ground state, a photon is emitted at a characteristic wavelength. The amount of oxygen in blood can be determined by measuring a change in the luminescent state of dye molecules, since the decay rate from the excited state is altered by the presence or absence of oxygen gas.
Several different techniques exist which are designed to measure the emission properties of luminescent dye molecules dispersed within a matrix or polymeric materials. For example, one can adapt a relatively simple approach of measuring the fluorescence intensity elicited by a constant excitation source, e.g., as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,476,870. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,810,655 and 4,895,156 further disclose methods of measuring the time resolved emission of a luminescent dye molecule dispersed within a polymeric material. If a pulse of light, used to excite a dye molecule, is of a relatively short duration (t<<&tgr;), the decay of emission intensity from the initial value F
i
will be approximately described by
F
(
t
)=
F
i
·e
−t/
&tgr; (3)
Various sampling and regression schemes can be used to estimate a value for &tgr;.
As disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,127,405, 5,281,825, and WO Application No. 92/19957, measurement of the phase shift for luminescence emitted by a luminescent dye molecule may be accomplished using a modulated excitation source. The excitation signal can be modulated such that the source intensity varies sinusoidally
E
(
t
)
=
E
p
·
(
1
+
sin
ω
t
2
)
(
4
)
where E
p
is the peak excitation source intensity and &ohgr; is the angular frequency of the excitation signal. The luminescence emission signal F(t) from the dye will also vary sinusoidally at the same frequency as the excitation signal, except with a phase lag which is related to the relaxation time by
F
(
t
)
=
1
(
1
-
ωτ
2
)
1
/
2
·
F
p
·
(
1
+
sin
(
ω
t
-
φ
)
2
)
(
5
)
where F
p
is the luminescence intensity that would result from a constant excitation at intensity E
p
and &PHgr; is the phase lag. The relaxation time can be calculated from the observed phase lag using the equation
τ
=
1
ω
·
tan
φ
(
6
)
Also, as disclosed in, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,716,363 and WO application No. 90/07107, a constant phase method for extracting relaxation information from samples may be employed through the use of a variable frequency modulated source. This constant phase technique includes adjusting the frequency (f) of the modulated excitation source with a feedback loop so that a constant phase lag, preferably in the range of 45°, is maintained. A rearrangement of equation (6) and substitution of &ohgr;=2&pgr;f yields:
f
=tan &phgr;/(2&pgr;&tgr;) (7)
If &phgr; is held constant at 45°, then tan &phgr;=1, and by substituting &tgr; from equation (2), it can be shown that:
f
=(1
+k
SV
·&rgr;O
2
)/2&pgr;&tgr;
o
(8)
Thus, the operating frequency of the feedback loop is directly proportional to the partial pressure of oxygen; as such, the constant phase method provides several advantages over the time resolved and constant frequency methods. For example, the constant phase method significantly reduces the complexity of the calculations required to produce a reported result. In addition, maintaining a constant phase lag permits the phase detector to operate in the most sensitive part of the response curve and optimizes signal to noise ratios by maintaining a constant signal amplitude over a wide range of oxygen partial pressures.
The time resolved, phase shift or frequency modulation methods are all advantageous particularly for the measurement of samples such as blood or milk; the light scattering characteristic of these samples will not affect the apparent quenching constants for the luminescence. However, while these methods may eliminate the need for optically opaque cover membranes to reduce optical interference of simple fluorescence amplitude-based measurements (such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,919,891; 5,081,041, and 5,091,800), the instrumentation needed to perform such relaxation-based measurements is decidedly more complex.
Different luminescent dye/polymeric material combinations have been employed to make oxygen sensing membranes. For example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,003,707 and 4,476,870 disclose the use of near-UV absorbing dyes from the pyrene and pyrelene families, respectively. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,587,101; 4,752,115; 5,030,420, and 5,631,340 advocate the use of ruthenium complexes which undergo Stern-Volmer quenching by oxygen and have longer lived excited states, as outlined in
Anal. Chem.
63,337 (1991). Lanthanide complexes, which also have longer lifetimes, have also been used for oxygen sensing purposes, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,861,727. Other luminescent dye molecules, such as porphyrin derivatives, are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,043,286 and WO application No. 95/10522, as well as in
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
7, 199 (1991),
Anal. Chem.
67, 4112 (1995), and
J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans.
2, 103 (1995).
Polymeric matrix materials which have been used include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,587,101; 4,752,115 and 5,043,286, teaching that unplasticized polymers or untreated sol-gels (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,047,350) offer relatively poor performance when used in dye-based gas sensing membranes. At the same time, plasticized
Berger Joseph
Collins Thomas C.
Slovacek Rudolf E.
Bayer Corporation
Reed Dianne E.
Reed & Associates
Snay Jeffrey
Wu Louis L.
LandOfFree
Oxygen sensing membranes and methods of making same does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Oxygen sensing membranes and methods of making same, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Oxygen sensing membranes and methods of making same will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2583999