Oversampled differential clipper

Data processing: generic control systems or specific application – Specific application – apparatus or process – Digital audio data processing system

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C381S106000, C708S313000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06337999

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to the field of audio signal clipping.
2. Prior Art
Clipping of audio waveforms has proved to be a valuable part of analog audio processing systems designed to reduce the peak-to-average ratio of audio with minimal audible side effects. This technology dates back at least to the 1940s.
When one realizes such a processing system in a sample-data (digital) domain, a number of problems occur that are not present in an analog realization. First is the problem of aliasing. Clipping ordinarily introduces harmonics of the signal not present in the original. The frequency of these harmonics can be higher than the Nyquist frequency, so that they alias back into the baseband. Because the aliased harmonics are generally harmonically unrelated to the frequencies that generated them, such aliased harmonics can be very offensive to the ear.
A further problem occurs when clipping is used to control the peak modulation of an analog transmission channel. Because the digital part of the system is only aware of samples taken from the analog input at certain times, it is highly improbable that any one sample will occur at the peak value of the analog input to such a digital system. While the peak value can be reconstructed from the samples, it must be done by the familiar process of passing each sample through a lowpass filter and observing the output of the lowpass filter in continuous time. Thus, attempting digital-domain clipping by a simple operation that compares each sample to a threshold and replaces the sample value by the threshold when the sample value exceeds the threshold may not work correctly unless the operation is highly oversampled so that it approximates a continuous time system. In this case one can choose the oversampling ratio so that there is guaranteed to be a sample whose value is very close to the peak value of the source analog waveform prior to analog-to-digital (A/D) conversion. A further advantage of oversampling is that it increases the Nyquist frequency so that harmonics caused by the clipping process can be correctly represented and not subject to aliasing. Experiment had shown that 16× oversampling is necessary to reduce errors below 1%.
Oversampling is a very well understood process that is subject to errors. Given sufficient processing power these errors can be reduced to an arbitrarily small magnitude but cannot be entirely eliminated. There is a direct tradeoff between the number of machine cycles used and the quality of the upsampling and downsampling. This is because these processes require filters to remove images caused by the upsampling process, and the flatter the passbands and deeper the stopbands of these filters, the more expensive the filters become. Therefore, if the audio to be processed is subject to oversampling, this process will inevitably distort the frequency response and will also introduce images and aliasing.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A method and apparatus for digital clipping and other processing of a clipped signal is disclosed. A signal is upsampled and then clipped in a way to provide the “clippings.” The “clippings” are lowpass filtered and downsampled. The resultant signal is subtracted from the input signal. Optionally, the downsampled “clippings” can be additionally processed.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4020332 (1977-04-01), Crochiere et al.
patent: 4208548 (1980-06-01), Orban
patent: 4292042 (1981-09-01), Kimble
patent: 4412100 (1983-10-01), Orban
patent: 4472785 (1984-09-01), Kasuga
patent: 4640871 (1987-02-01), Hayashi et al.
patent: 4870682 (1989-09-01), Morrey et al.
patent: 4949177 (1990-08-01), Bannister et al.
patent: 5168526 (1992-12-01), Orban
patent: 5355328 (1994-10-01), Arbeiter et al.
patent: 5432716 (1995-07-01), Lebowsky et al.
patent: 5444788 (1995-08-01), Orban
patent: 5461340 (1995-10-01), Chahabadi et al.
patent: 5488374 (1996-01-01), Frankot et al.
patent: 5574791 (1996-11-01), Orban
patent: 5579404 (1996-11-01), Fielder et al.
patent: 5631969 (1997-05-01), Hanson
patent: 5734438 (1998-03-01), Into
patent: 5737432 (1998-04-01), Werrbach
patent: 5737434 (1998-04-01), Orban
patent: 5757931 (1998-05-01), Yamada et al.
patent: 5767900 (1998-06-01), Tanji et al.
patent: 5805715 (1998-09-01), Rhee
patent: 5815580 (1998-09-01), Craven et al.
patent: 5892694 (1999-04-01), Ott
patent: 5929795 (1999-07-01), Wang

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Oversampled differential clipper does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Oversampled differential clipper, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Oversampled differential clipper will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2872540

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.