Harvesters – Gang
Reexamination Certificate
2001-04-27
2002-12-03
Pezzuto, Robert E. (Department: 3671)
Harvesters
Gang
C056S010300, C056S011300, C192S01800B
Reexamination Certificate
active
06487835
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to mechanisms for protecting mechanical drive components from overloads, and more particularly relates to a shear device and brake coupled between components of an agricultural disc mower that protects the various components of the mower in the event a cutterhead strikes an object and creates an overload condition.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Typical disc cutterbars used in agriculture include an elongated housing containing a train of meshed idler and drive spur gears, or a main power shaft coupled by respective bevel gear sets, for delivering power to respective drive shafts for cutterheads spaced along the length of the cutterbar. The cutterheads each comprise a cutting disc including diametrically opposed cutting blades (though configurations with three or more blades are known) and having a hub coupled to an upper end of a drive shaft, the lower end of the drive shaft carrying a spur gear in the case where a train of meshed spur gears is used for delivering power, and carrying a bevel gear of a given one of the bevel gear sets in the case where a main power shaft is used. In either case, bearings are used to support the various shafts. The cutterheads are rotated at a relatively fast speed making the drive components, such as gears, bearings and shafts, vulnerable to damage in the event that the unit strikes a foreign object. For background information on the structure and operation of some typical disc cutterbars, reference is made to U.S. Pat. No. 4, 815,262, issued to E. E. Koch and F. F. Voler, the descriptive portions thereof being incorporated herein in full by reference.
In order to minimize the extent of such possible damage to the drive components, it is known to incorporate a shear device somewhere in the derive of each unit which will “fail” upon a predetermined overload being imposed on the device. As used herein with reference to shear devices, the terms “fail” or “failing” are intended to cover the actual function of such devices, i.e., shearing, fracturing, breaking and the like. Several different such shear devices and arrangements are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,999,981, 4,497,161 and 5,715,662.
The '981 patent shows a shear mechanism that comprises a shaft with a weakened portion created by a cut groove, or break zone 41 (seen, for example, in FIG. 3 thereof) in driven shaft 20. Upon overload, the shaft breaks at zone 41 that is located outside the support bearing such that there is a clean and complete break in the shaft. This structure is intended to eliminate the input of kinetic energy to,the cutterhead after failure of the shear mechanism, thereby eliminating damage to the drive system and gearing. While this structure may in fact eliminate the input of further kinetic energy, it does not stop rotation of the cutterhead or prevent the damage that continued rotation would generate.
A somewhat different shear mechanism is disclosed in FIGS. 2 and 3 of the '161 patent. Cutting disc 3 is connected by a series of shear bolts 26 to the vertical shaft 8. Upon impact of the cutterhead with an obstruction, the shear bolts fail, stopping the input of rotational force to the cutterhead. FIG. 4 shows a slightly different embodiment where a resilient cover plate 28 depresses balls 30 arranged in holes of the disc 3 and fitting into recesses 31 of the disc 27. An overload impact is intended to cause balls 30 to snap out of the recesses 31 so that the direct rotary joint between shaft 8 and cutting disc 3 is interrupted. It is stated that the connection can be re-established by continuing to rotate disc 3 with respect to the disc 27 so that the balls 30 again snap into the recesses 31. The embodiments set forth in this patent exhibit the same shortcomings as seen in the '981 patent, i.e., standard shear mechanisms do not stop rotation of the cutterhead, and thus do not prevent additional damage thereby encountered.
The shear mechanisms shown in the '662 patent each employ shearable splines. A first embodiment the shear device is in the form of either a collar or clamping member having internal splines received on a splined upper end of the drive shaft and having shearable cylindrical drive lugs engaged with complementary shaped openings provided in an upper surface of a disk hub. Referring more specifically to FIG. 2 thereof, the upper end of drive shaft 26 has a splined section 86. Shear collar 88 establishes a drive connection between shaft 26 and hub 80. The collar 88 includes internal splines 90 engaged with the splined section 86 of shaft 26 just above hub 80. Shearable cylindrical drive lugs 92 project downwardly from the bottom of collar 88 and are received in complementary holes 94 in hub 80. An overload situation causes the lugs 92 to shear and the continuing transfer of rotational power to cease. FIGS. 4 through 6 shows another embodiment where shaft 34 has a splined upper end section 110. Instead of a shear collar, a shear device in the form of a cap-like clamping member 114 is used for transferring torque from shaft 34 to hub 80. Clamping member 114 has an annular lower portion
116
provided with interior splines 118 engaged with the splined section 110 of shaft 34. A plurality of shearable lugs 120 extend downward from lower portion 116 and are received in complementary shaped cylindrical openings 94 in hub 80, whereby torque is transferred from shaft 34 to hub 80. Again, when an overload occurs, lugs 120 shear, and torque is no longer transmitted. The final embodiment shown in the '662 patent is shown in FIGS. 7 through 9. Instead of a disk hub 80, a disk hub 127 is used which has a central splined opening 128 disposed in spaced concentric relationship t the splined upper end section 110 of shaft 34. A ring-like shear insert 130 is received on the upper end of the drive shaft 34 and has inner splines 132 engaged with the splined upper end section of the shaft and has outer splines 134 engaged with the splined opening 128 of hub 126. Splines 132 are designed to shear upon overload.
Similar to the other prior art discussed above, the embodiments of the '662 patent do not stop the cutterhead from rotating, even after power is cut off by a shear device. The third embodiment shown in this patent exhibits an additional shortcoming in that upon failure of the shearable splines, the broken pieces tend to become temporarily “jammed” in among the other parts and components., resulting in even further, though short lived, torque to be transferred, and the resultant additional damage to the cutterheads.
Particularly in its preferred embodiment, the instant invention overcomes the drawbacks and shortcomings of the prior art. A two-piece hub design, with an epoxy shear surface therebetween will fail with substantially no residual transfer of torque. In fact, this shear mechanism results in no discernable. residue, and is easily repaired by merely adding new epoxy. Upon failure, the two-piece hub, one of which is driven directly by a drive shaft, separates and the non-driven portion engages a braking mechanism that stops rotation of the cutterhead, i.e., the non-driven portion of the hub.
While the concept of a shear mechanism other than shear pins, lugs or bolts is not new, the use of a frangible layer such as epoxy in the environment of a cutterbar is new and provides advantages in overcoming the problems and shortcomings of the prior art as discussed above. In order to limit the damage to a cutterbar in an overload situation, two characteristics are pursued—a quick, clean disengagement of the driven elements, and a rapid end of rotation of the cutterhead. The epoxy layer provides the first, and the novel brake the second. For non-traditional shear mechanisms, attention is directed to U.S. Pat. No. 2,056,785 (rubber), 3,064,454 (solder, glass, and other fracturable and fusible materials), and 3,521,464 (plastic).
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, one object of the present invention is to provide a brake, operating in conjunction with a shear mechanism, in a mechanical
Ekis Imants
Kraus Timothy J.
Mammen Nathan
Miller Larry W.
New Holland North America Inc.
Pezzuto Robert E.
Stader John William
LandOfFree
Overload protection for a disc cutterbar does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Overload protection for a disc cutterbar, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Overload protection for a disc cutterbar will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2932480