Data processing: generic control systems or specific application – Specific application – apparatus or process – Product assembly or manufacturing
Reexamination Certificate
2002-10-09
2004-10-05
Picard, Leo (Department: 2125)
Data processing: generic control systems or specific application
Specific application, apparatus or process
Product assembly or manufacturing
C700S124000, C356S400000, C356S401000, C716S030000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06801827
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a method for manufacturing a semiconductor device and more particularly, to a method and system for accurately detecting and correcting an overlay error in a light exposure step.
A semiconductor device manufactured by repeating for each layer a step of depositing a conductive or insulating film on a wafer and a lithography step of coating a resist as a photosensitive agent on the film, subjecting the resist to light exposure with a circuit pattern on a reticle disposed therebetween, developing it and etching the film with use of the remaining resist as a mask to thereby form the circuit pattern on the wafer. At this time, when the circuit pattern during the exposure is positionally shifted (has a registration error) to a pattern of an underlying layer, the circuit is disconnected or short-circuited, which results in that a resulting semiconductor device becomes faulty. To avoid this, prior to the exposure of the circuit pattern, the exposure apparatus optically detects alignment marks provided in an outer periphery of the circuit pattern as an underlying layer, measures the position of the underlying layer, and corrects the transfer position to thereby realize alignment between the underlying layer and exposure layer.
Further, after actual exposure and transfer (prior to etching), an overlay inspection equipment measures a relative registration error between the overlay mark of the underlying layer and the overlay mark of the exposure layer, and feeds the registration error back to the exposure apparatus as a correction. When the registration error exceeds its allowable value, the exposure apparatus, after stripping the resist, performs re-coating, light exposing and developing operations. Such work is called re-work. That is, the overlay inspection is carried out for the purpose of judging necessity or non-necessity of the feedback to the exposure apparatus and re-work.
It is assumed in the above alignment inspection that the registration error measured based on the overlay mark indicates the registration error of the circuit pattern. However, now that, as the circuit pattern is made finer, the shift allowable value is made smaller, it has been found that there sometimes occurs such a situation that the above fact cannot hold true. The registration error depends on the wave aberration of an exposure lens. This will be explained below by referring to FIG.
18
.
An exposure lens
30
, for example, has a coma aberration
300
as the wave aberration. This is asymmetrical aberration resulting, for example, from the eccentricity and tilt of an element lens and the surface accuracy error of the lens surface at the time of assembling the exposure lens
30
. The coma aberration
300
has a tilt large in the vicinity of the periphery of the exposure lens
30
. A light beam passing through the exposure lens
30
is bent by an amount proportional to the tilt of the coma aberration
300
. Meanwhile, the angle of the beam diffracted by a reticle varies with the spatial frequency of a transfer pattern. Accordingly when the spatial frequency of the transfer pattern varies, the position of the beam passing through the exposure lens
30
is changed, thus changing also the registration error.
FIGS. 18A and 18B
show diagrams when an exposure beam
2003
is directed into a rough pattern
210
and a fine pattern
220
respectively. Since a diffracted beam
2005
of the fine pattern
220
of
FIG. 18B
having a large diffraction angle passes through the exposure lens
30
closer to its periphery than that of the rough pattern
210
of
FIG. 18A
, a registration error &Dgr;x′ of
FIG. 18B
is larger than a registration error &Dgr;x of FIG.
18
A. This means that, since the spatial frequency varies with the circuit pattern and overlay mark, the registration error during transfer also varies, which leads to the fact that the aforementioned overlay inspection assumption is not satisfied.
With respect to light exposure, in addition to such usual illumination as shown in
FIG. 19A
, there may be employed annular illumination as described in a literature entitled “Optical Alliance”, January, 1998, page 4.
FIG. 19B
shows a case of annular illumination. In the annular illumination, an illumination light flux
2002
has an annular section and has an effect of enhancing the contrast of the transfer pattern. As shown in
FIG. 19B
, a registration error &Dgr;X′ of the transfer pattern of the light flux expanded outwards becomes larger than a registration error &Dgr;X of the usual illumination. This means that even illumination conditions also affects a difference in registration error between the circuit pattern and overlay mark.
In order to solve the above problem, there is disclosed a method for performing overlay inspection with use of an overlay mark as a pattern having a spatial frequency similar to a circuit pattern in JP-A-10-312958.
The above known art may have problems which follow. That is, to make to coincide with the spatial frequency of the circuit pattern, an overlay mark
214
includes such a pattern
215
of several lines as shown in FIG.
20
. However, since the pattern is fine and long, a part of the line pattern in the vicinity of an end of the overlay mark may fall or may tend to become easily asymmetrical under the influences of halation or wave aberration from an adjacent part
41
. A registration error with respect to the underlying layer is calculated by processing the waveform of an optical image
2140
of the entire line pattern. Thus, when one end of the line pattern becomes asymmetrical, an error &Dgr;ER may be generated in the measured registration error.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is therefore and object of the present invention to provide a semiconductor manufacturing method for correcting a difference in registration error between a circuit pattern and an overlay mark while eliminating the need for modifying the overlay mark to a fine line pattern. Novel features of the present invention will become clear from the description of the present specification and attached drawings.
Some aspects of inventions disclosed in the present application are as follows.
There is provided a method of manufacturing a semiconductor device, which includes the steps of measuring an actual registration error between a transfer image when a first overlay mark formed on a first reticle is actually formed as transferred on a substrate with use of a first aligner or exposure equipment and a transfer image when a second overlay mark formed on a second reticle is formed as transferred on the substrate, predicting an actual registration error between the transfer images of the circuit patterns from data of the measured registration error by use of a previously determined relationship between a registration error between a transfer image formed when a first circuit pattern formed on the first reticle is transferred to the substrate by use of the first exposure equipment and a registration error between a transfer image formed when a second circuit pattern formed on the second reticle is transferred to the substrate by use of the second aligner or exposure equipment and also with use of the registration error between the transfer images of the overlay marks, correcting the second exposure device on the basis of the predicted registration error information between the transfer images of the circuit patterns, and subjecting the second circuit pattern subjected by the first exposure equipment to light exposure by the corrected second exposure equipment to light exposure.
As a result, the system can accurately predict the registration error of the circuit pattern from the measured value of the registration error of the overlay mark, can set a suitable correction value for the exposure equipment, and can increase the yield of the semiconductor device.
Further, the circuit pattern is a circuit pattern having the severest tolerance of the overlay specifications. Since the system can set the correction value for the circuit pattern which h
Matsumoto Shunichi
Miwa Toshiharu
Yoshitake Yasuhiro
Kasenge Charles
Picard Leo
LandOfFree
Overlay inspection apparatus for semiconductor substrate and... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Overlay inspection apparatus for semiconductor substrate and..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Overlay inspection apparatus for semiconductor substrate and... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3269753