Boots – shoes – and leggings – Orthopedic boot or shoe with corrective element – With means to turn foot about its long axis
Reexamination Certificate
2002-06-07
2004-08-31
Stashick, Anthony D. (Department: 3728)
Boots, shoes, and leggings
Orthopedic boot or shoe with corrective element
With means to turn foot about its long axis
C036S173000, C036S178000, C036S092000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06782643
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
a. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to orthotic devices for use in shoes, and, more particularly, to an orthotic insert having a heel post with an angled lower surface of the lateral side for controlling angulation in a lateral direction at heel strike and a rigid plate member with a distal medial portion for controlling angulation in a medial direction as the foot progresses towards toe-off.
b. Related Art
Orthotic inserts have long been employed to treat conditions or otherwise enhance the functions of the human foot, whether for ordinary walking or for various forms of specialized activities, such as skiing, skating, running and so on.
A particular category of these devices employs a built-up structure in which there is a generally rigid, but still somewhat resilient flexible plate for supporting the plantar surface of the foot, and a thick, vertical post which is mounted to the heel end of the plate. Typically, the orthotic plate is constructed of a somewhat thin, generally rigid material, such as glass- or graphite-fiber/resin composite materials, polyurethane, molded plastics or the like. The post, in turn, is frequently formed of a generally hard but somewhat compressively yielding material, such as hard rubber, molded urethane, Neoprene or methyl methacrylate, which is capable of supporting the rear foot under the loads that are developed at heel strike.
Such devices are generally intended to both correctly position the foot at heel strike and control the motions of the foot as it progresses through the stance phase of the gait cycle from heel strike towards toe-off. The insert also provides or madates a range of motion in the joints of the foot. For example, a normal foot should roll (frontal plane motion) about 4°-6° when walking. To control the motion of the foot, the plate member flexes resiliently to a controlled degree, and frequently there is also a need to impart a degree of rocking or eversion/inversion motion at the heel post as well, depending on the needs of the individual foot and the intended use. For example, it is often desirable to position the foot so as to increase inversion at heel contact, so as to increase the total amount of pronation and therefore the total amount of motion which is available for the balance of the gait cycle.
In order to provide the desired degree of inversion at heel strike, common practice in the prior art has been to form the heel post with a flat bottom that extends parallel to the transverse plane of the foot and insole. Material is then ground or otherwise removed from the bottom of the heel post on the lateral side. For example,
FIG. 3
shows an exemplary prior art orthotic device
10
having a rigid plate
12
and raised heel post
14
. A portion of the flat bottom surface
16
has been ground off to form an angled secondary surface
18
on the lateral side of the post. This provides the post with a “bi-planar” bottom which is intended to pivot the post through a controlled angle &thgr;
0
, from a first position in which the mean bottom surface
16
rests flat on the transverse plane
20
, to a second position in which the upwardly-angled lateral surface
18
rests on the insole. The rocking motion of the heel post is imparted to the plate member
10
which is mounted to the top of the post, the plate member being the component which actually bears against and engages the plantar surface of the person's foot. Thus, the post inverts the rearfoot at heel strike, when the weight is borne mostly on the lateral side of the heel, as indicated at
22
in FIG.
2
. Then, as indicated by dotted line
24
, the weight shifts forwardly and medially as the foot progresses through the gait cycle. As the weight shifts onto the medial side of the foot, as indicated at
26
in
FIG. 2
, the post is intended to pivot medially and return the device to the initial orientation shown in FIG.
3
.
For several reasons, the operation of prior art devices of this type has frequently been unsatisfactory. For example, as can be seen in
FIG. 4
, the insole
30
and heel counter
32
of a conventional shoe are usually convexly curved in order to accommodate the heel. As a result, the edges of the bi-planar post tend to dig into and “hang up” on the sides of the heel counter/insole, especially along the medial and lateral edges
34
,
36
. This impairs the ability of the post to produce the desired rocking motion, to the point that deep wear areas often develop where the edges of the post press into and rub against the material of the heel counter.
As can be seen in
FIG. 4
, the flat bottom
16
and the tendency of the edges to hang up on the sides of the counter/insole also tend to prevent the post from fitting all the way down into the shoe, so that a significant gap
38
is left between the insole and the bottom of the device. This causes the heel of the orthotic to sit excessively high in the heel of the shoe and creates user discomfort. Moreover, the unpredictable engagement between the post and counter/insole often causes the post to become tilted one way or another and out of proper alignment with respect to the transverse plane, so that even if the device is able to rock back and forth in the shoe it is unable to develop the desired angulation and range of motion.
Practitioners have resorted to various expediencies in an effort to address these problems. For example, it is common to attempt to “custom fit” the device to the interior of the shoe by grinding away additional material along the perimeter of the post and/or gradually increasing the angle of the lateral plane until the desired degree of motion is achieved. However, this requires considerable tedious work, and unless great care is exercised too much material may be removed so that the device must be discarded. In other instances, practitioners have resorted to filling in the heel area of the insole in order to provide a raised, flat surface for the medial plane of the post, referred to as a “heel raise” but this is again an expensive and time-consuming process, and also modifies the shoe so that in some instances it can no longer be used without the orthotic insert.
Still further, even in installations where the device ends up functioning as intended, the results have often been less than ideal from a biomechanical standpoint. For example, employing the flat medial surface of the post to control the range of motion creates an abrupt stop to the rocking motion as the weight of the foot shifts to the medial side. This is quite noticeable and somewhat uncomfortable to the wearer, and also counteracts the normal shock-absorbing function of the foot as it pronates. In some instances designers have attempted to compensate for this problem by using a softer, more flexible material for the orthotic plate, however, the reduction in rigidity tends to compromise the structural integrity of the plate and its ability to properly support and control the motions of the foot. Moreover, the abrupt stop tends to cause the material of the plate to flex excessively in the area just forward of the distal medial edge of the post (see area
40
in FIG.
1
); over time, the flexing causes the plate to develop cracks in this area, which is a principle cause of failure of orthotic inserts of this type.
Accordingly, there exists a need for an orthotic insert having a heel post, in which the heel post fits into the curved insole and heel counter of the shoe without impairing the desired pivoting motion of the insert. Furthermore, there exists a need for such an orthotic insert in which the bottom of the post fits down into the shoe without hanging up on the sides of the heel counter/insole, so that the insert does not sit excessively high within the shoe. Still further, there exists a need for such an orthotic insert which does not create an abrupt stop to the pivoting motion in the medial direction, as the weight of the foot is transferred to medial side of the insert, so as to provide enhanced shock-absorption characteristics and reduce struc
Hathaway Todd N.
Stashick Anthony D.
LandOfFree
Orthotic insert having heel post with contoured lower surface does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Orthotic insert having heel post with contoured lower surface, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Orthotic insert having heel post with contoured lower surface will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3295540