Image analysis – Pattern recognition – Template matching
Reexamination Certificate
1998-03-02
2001-08-07
Couso, Jose L. (Department: 2721)
Image analysis
Pattern recognition
Template matching
Reexamination Certificate
active
06272248
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an original-discrimination system and image forming apparatus, image processing apparatus and duplicator comprising the original-discrimination system. The original-discrimination system is described. There may be an act, for example, in which a special document, such as paper money, securities and so on is duplicated using duplicating means such as a digital duplicator. Thus, the special document may be forged on recording paper containing the duplicated corresponding image. As a method for preventing such an act, it may be devised that an original-discrimination system is previously incorporated in the duplicator. This original-discrimination system has a function of determining whether or not an image is of a special document such as a predetermined paper money, the image being used as a duplication original in the duplicating means. This duplicating means may comprise an arrangement in which duplication by the duplicating means is disabled if the original-discrimination system determines that the duplication original is the predetermined special document. By comprising such an arrangement, it becomes possible to prevent the above-mentioned forgery act.
2. Background of Related Art
As is well known, recently, image processing technology and image forming technology have been improved. As a result, it is possible for a special document such as a sheet of paper money to be duplicated using a color duplication device, for example. In this case, by this duplication, the corresponding image is produced on a recording paper. The obtained copy, that is, the recording paper on which the relevant image is produced and the relevant special document, such as a paper money, having been used as the duplication original in the relevant duplication, may closely approximate the original. In the extreme case, it may be difficult to distinguish between the copy and the special document.
In order to cope with such a situation as mentioned above, the above-mentioned original-discrimination system has been developed. One example of a method used in this original-discrimination system is disclosed in Japanese Laid-Open Application No.2-83571, Image Recording Device. In this method, a so-called Pattern Matching Method is used. This Pattern Matching Method is a general one as such a discrimination function. In the device in the above disclosure the input image signal is compared with previously registered pattern data. The input image signal comprises a signal corresponding to a duplication original and the registered pattern data is data corresponding to a special document such as a bill of paper currency, for example. As is well known, special documents such as a paper money are only printed by a designated organ and printing thereof by an unauthorized person, prohibited. As a result of the above mentioned comparison, a case where the input image signal is identical to the registered pattern data may be detected. It is then possible to prevent duplication of the duplication original corresponding to the input image signal, in this case, using the determination result.
Further, Japanese Laid-Open Patent Application No.60-229572 discloses Image Processing Apparatus using, as the criterion, image data itself of a determination-object paper-money acting a reference.
In an original-discrimination system such as above, there are the following problems: As is well known, images used in a special document such as paper money, for example, are extremely intricate. Further, to realize the image of the paper money, that is, to print the bill of paper money, various colors and intricate patterns are used. Accordingly, the amount of the above-mentioned pattern data, corresponding to the paper money in which the intricate and various colors and patterns are used, is very large. In order to store the thus large amount of data, a memory having a very large capacity is required accordingly. The thus very large capacity memory is required for the original-discrimination system. The original-descrimination system is extremely expensive. In addition, the comparison operation for determination, using the large amount of pattern data, is accordingly complex. The complex operation requires a correspondingly complex construction accordingly. Such a complex construction adds to the expense of the original-discrimination system. Furthermore, the original-discrimination operation using the complex construction takes a very long time to perform.
Also, since the manner in which an original acting as the determination object is placed on a platen glass of an apparatus such as a duplicator is chosen by a user, the manner may be predicted to be any manners. The placement manner relates to a placement position and placement angle (the original may be placed obliquely). This impossibility of placement manner prediction may also cause the construction of the relevant apparatus to be complex.
In an apparatus having such a complex construction, as described above, a considerable working time may be required for the relevant processing accordingly. As a result, real-time processing may not be possible. Real-time processing comprises a processing in which various processing required for the relevant duplication work may be smoothly performed without any delay in a case where an original is duplicated in a duplicator, for example. In these series of processing, data to be processed is processed soon after it is input without having to wait. Disablement of such a real-time processing may degrade the efficiency of the relevant apparatus.
Further, in an apparatus having such a complex construction, it may be difficult to immediately cope with the following cases, for example: A case where e new version of paper money is issued by the Bank of Japan; and a case where it is required to immediately deal with currencies and/or paper money of various foreign countries.
Another example of such an apparatus used for preventing a special document such as a paper money from being forged is disclosed in Japanese Laid-Open Patent Application No.2-210591. An image processing apparatus disclosed therein detects the placement condition of an original placed on a platen glass of the apparatus. The apparatus, using the detected placement condition, extracts only partial original-image data corresponding to a predetermined region of the original. Then, the apparatus compares this partial original-image data with reference image information previously registered in the apparatus. Then, the apparatus, as a result of the comparison, determines to what degree the partial original-image data and the reference image information approximate one another. Then, from the result of the determination, the apparatus detects whether or not the original placed on the platen glass comprises the relevant special document.
Further, this image processing apparatus detects four corners (that is, four vertexes of a rectangle, hereinafter) of the original placed on the platen glass. By the detection the apparatus detects the position at which the original is placed and the rotation angle at which the original is placed, as mentioned above. It is possible, for example, with the apparatus using a method such as mentioned above, to place a plurality of paper money bills of a same denomination on the platen glass such that there is no space between the paper money bills; and the bills are arranged in both vertical and horizontal directions. In this case, the apparatus detects the four corners of the contiguous entirety. Such four-corner detection may not enable detection of the four corners of each bill from among the placed plurality of bills. As a result, the position of each bill cannot be detected. As a result, this apparatus cannot detect that the bills comprise paper money.
Further, in such a conventional original-discrimination system, in a case where a paper money sheet is duplicated for example, if something such as an unexpected meaningless scribble mark exists on the paper money bill
Aida Midori
Fukuda Haruhiko
Hashiguchi Tadato
Hikita Toshiya
Ishigaki Kouji
Couso Jose L.
Oblon & Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt P.C.
Ricoh & Company, Ltd.
LandOfFree
Original-discrimination system for discriminating special... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Original-discrimination system for discriminating special..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Original-discrimination system for discriminating special... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2517791