Optimizing to-be-printed objects during print job processing

Facsimile and static presentation processing – Static presentation processing – Attribute control

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C382S100000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07859716

ABSTRACT:
Methods for processing print jobs in rendering devices include representing multiple to-be-printed objects with fewer such objects before processing of the objects occurs. In this manner, processing and memory requirements are optimized. Examples include utilizing a single raster operation function of one object for an entirety of objects; using fewer raster operation functions than originally required for the entirety of objects; creating a no processing (NOP) situation; and effectively creating a mask. Other aspects include modifying raster operation functions of one or more objects to have fewer variables than originally specified by the print job. Printers having stored or accessible computer executable instructions for performing the steps are also disclosed as are host devices that may direct or control the printer to perform the same.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5379129 (1995-01-01), Othmer
patent: 5542052 (1996-07-01), Deutsch
patent: 5608848 (1997-03-01), Walker
patent: 5638498 (1997-06-01), Tyler et al.
patent: 5638499 (1997-06-01), O'Connor
patent: 5659407 (1997-08-01), Andresen
patent: 5734802 (1998-03-01), Maltz
patent: 5805174 (1998-09-01), Ramchandran
patent: 5841898 (1998-11-01), Liguori
patent: 5926185 (1999-07-01), Vyncke
patent: 5946451 (1999-08-01), Soker
patent: 5966462 (1999-10-01), Linder
patent: 5978553 (1999-11-01), Ikeda
patent: 5987230 (1999-11-01), Shimizu
patent: 6020897 (2000-02-01), Carlsen
patent: 6049339 (2000-04-01), Schiller
patent: 6052202 (2000-04-01), Shimizu
patent: 6257693 (2001-07-01), Miller et al.
patent: 6289364 (2001-09-01), Borg
patent: 6323958 (2001-11-01), Shimizu
patent: 6330072 (2001-12-01), Barada
patent: 6396959 (2002-05-01), Hamburg
patent: 6466210 (2002-10-01), Carlsen
patent: 6466229 (2002-10-01), Nagao
patent: 6490055 (2002-12-01), Shimizu
patent: 6522427 (2003-02-01), Bhattacharjya
patent: 6532081 (2003-03-01), Cecchi
patent: 6535293 (2003-03-01), Mitsuhashi
patent: 6546132 (2003-04-01), Bhattacharjya
patent: 6616359 (2003-09-01), Nakagiri et al.
patent: 6665094 (2003-12-01), Lapstun
patent: 6741368 (2004-05-01), Hoel
patent: 6970958 (2005-11-01), Tohki
patent: 7532355 (2009-05-01), Gauthier et al.
patent: 2001/0050781 (2001-12-01), Kujirai
patent: 2002/0003633 (2002-01-01), Matsumoto et al.
patent: 2002/0131065 (2002-09-01), Sweetland
patent: 2003/0147098 (2003-08-01), Gnutzmann
patent: 2003/0184804 (2003-10-01), Mastie et al.
patent: 2003/0189716 (2003-10-01), Tsuji et al.
patent: 2004/0008381 (2004-01-01), Jacob et al.
patent: 2004/0027616 (2004-02-01), Lapstun et al.
patent: 2004/0032617 (2004-02-01), Lapstun et al.
patent: 2004/0036919 (2004-02-01), Lpastun et al.
patent: 2004/0036920 (2004-02-01), Lapstun et al.
patent: 2004/0036921 (2004-02-01), Lapstun et al.
patent: 2004/0042045 (2004-03-01), Lapstun et al.
patent: 2004/0042046 (2004-03-01), Lapstun et al.
patent: 2004/0051903 (2004-03-01), Lapstun et al.
patent: 2004/0051904 (2004-03-01), Lapstun et al.
patent: 2004/0075849 (2004-04-01), Jacobsen et al.
patent: 2004/0085559 (2004-05-01), Danilo
patent: 2004/0095613 (2004-05-01), Kuwahara
patent: 2004/0100658 (2004-05-01), Kanda et al.
patent: 2004/0105106 (2004-06-01), Miller et al.
patent: 2004/0109182 (2004-06-01), Nagarajan et al.
patent: 2004/0114184 (2004-06-01), Sugiyama
patent: 2005/0213114 (2005-09-01), Clark et al.
patent: 2005/0213117 (2005-09-01), Clark et al.
patent: 2005/0213119 (2005-09-01), Clark et al.
patent: 2005/0213130 (2005-09-01), Bender et al.
patent: 2005/0213142 (2005-09-01), Clark et al.
patent: 2005/0213143 (2005-09-01), Cook et al.
patent: 2008/0024810 (2008-01-01), Clark et al.
patent: 2008/0137119 (2008-06-01), Clark et al.
patent: 2009/0097067 (2009-04-01), Cook et al.
patent: 2009/0109459 (2009-04-01), Bender et al.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/033,944, dated Apr. 2, 2010.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/983,390, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, dated Mar. 4, 2009.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/810,140, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, dated Mar. 21, 2008.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/983,952, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, dated Feb. 5, 2009.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/810,004, U.S. Patent and Tradmark Office, dated Dec. 8, 2009.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/810,143, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, dated Nov. 30, 2009.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Optimizing to-be-printed objects during print job processing does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Optimizing to-be-printed objects during print job processing, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Optimizing to-be-printed objects during print job processing will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4181720

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.